Texas Education Agency will take control of Houston ISD | The Texas Tribune

This blog originally appeared at THE TEXAS TRIBUNE.

The announcement comes almost four years after the agency first moved to take over the district.

Millard House II, superintendent of the Houston Independent School District, delivers the HISD State of the Schools Address in Houston on March 3, 2023. The Texas Education Agency will replace House and the district’s school board as part of a state takeover. Credit: Joseph Bui for The Texas Tribune.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


After a prolonged legal battle and weeks of speculation, the Texas Education Agency on Wednesday confirmed it’s removing Houston Independent School District’s democratically elected school board and superintendent, effectively putting the state in charge of its largest school district.

Houston ISD, with 276 schools and an enrollment of nearly 200,000 students, will now be the largest district the agency has taken over since 2000, when it first intervened in a struggling school district.

Superintendent Millard House II and the current school board will finish out the school year, but the TEA will replace them after June 1 with “a board of managers.”

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The TEA commissioner decides how long the board is in place. Usually, this sort of takeover has lasted two to six years.

The agency will host community meetings in the coming weeks to explain how the takeover will take place.

The move is in response to years of poor academic outcomes at a single campus in the district, Phillis Wheatley High School, and allegations of misconduct from school board members. TEA Commissioner Mike Morath said state law requires his agency to either close that campus or appoint a new board to oversee the district.

Texas passed a law in 2015 mandating a state takeover if a school district or one of its campuses receives failing grades from the TEA for five consecutive years. Phillis Wheatley reached that threshold in 2019.

Catch up on education news with our weekly newsletter

Education Weekly Roundup newsletter

Catch up on education news with our weekly newsletter

Browse all newsletters at texastribune.org/newsletters.

Morath and the agency moved to force out the district’s school board that same year. The district pushed back and sued, but the Texas Supreme Court ruled in January that the agency could move forward with its plan to take over the district.

“Even with a delay of three full years caused by legal proceedings, systemic problems in Houston ISD continue to impact students most in need of our collective support,” Morath wrote in a letter to district leaders Wednesday.

Read more: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/03/15/texas-education-houston-isd-takeover/

Texas Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion law over medical exceptions | AP News

This blog originally appeared at AP NEWS.

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The Texas Supreme Court on Friday rejected a closely watched challenge to the state’s restrictive abortion ban, ruling against a group of women who had serious pregnancy complications and became the first in the U.S. to testify in court about being denied abortions since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

In a unanimous ruling, the all-Republican court upheld the Texas law that opponents say is too vague when it comes to when medically necessary exceptions are allowed. The same issue was at the center of a separate lawsuit brought last year by Kate Cox, a mother of two from Dallas, who sought court permission to obtain an abortion after her fetus developed a fatal condition during a pregnancy that resulted in multiple trips to an emergency room.

Abortion rights activists have struggled to stem the tide of restrictions that have taken effect in most Republican-led states since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe vs Wade, which for nearly 50 years had affirmed the constitutional right to an abortion.

The court said the law’s exceptions, as written, are broad enough and that doctors would be misinterpreting the law if they declined to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is in danger.

RELATED COVERAGE

This photo provided by KWTV shows a hail stone, Sunday, June 2, 2024, near Vigo Park, Texas. The National Weather Service in Lubbock, Texas, said they believe the stone, which measured more than 7 inches long, is a new state record. (Val Castor/KWTV via AP)

A hail stone the size of a pineapple was found in Texas. It likely sets a state record

Cecelia Ammon fills out her ballot on primary election day at the Central Mercado in Southeast Albuquerque, N.M., on Tuesday, June 4, 2024. (Chancey Bush/The Albuquerque Journal via AP)

New Mexico voters oust incumbents from Legislature with positive implications for paid family leave

FILE - Daniel Perry enters the courtroom at the Blackwell-Thurman Criminal Justice Center, May 10, 2023, in Austin, Texas. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles on Thursday, May 16, 2024, recommended a full pardon for Perry, a former U.S. Army sergeant convicted of murder for fatally shooting an armed demonstrator in 2020 during nationwide protests against police violence and racial injustice. (Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP, Pool, File)

Prosecutor asks Texas court to reverse governor’s pardon of man who fatally shot demonstrator

“Texas law permits a life-saving abortion,” the court wrote in the order signed by Justice Jane Bland.

The decision appeared to close, at least for now, another pathway for opponents who have sought to force the state to provide more clarity about when exceptions are allowed. Last year, plaintiffs in the lawsuit gave emotional accounts in an Austin courtroom over how they carried babies they knew would not survive and continued pregnancies that put their health in worsening danger.

“Now we know the courthouse doors are closed to them,” said Molly Duane, a staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represented the Texas women. “It seems Texans have nowhere to go but the voting booth, in terms of what comes next.”

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/texas-abortion-ban-lawsuit-supreme-court-ruling-53b871dcd40b2660604980e5daa19512

Kansas Constitution does not include a right to vote, state Supreme Court majority says | AP News

This blog originally appeared at AP NEWS.

The Kansas Supreme Court delivered a mixed ruling on Friday regarding multiple challenges to a 2021 election law. The court sided with state officials on one provision, revived challenges to others, and suggested that at least one challenge could be resolved before this year’s general election.

However, the most contentious part of the ruling was the majority opinion on the ballot signature verification measure, which stated that the Kansas Constitution’s Bill of Rights does not guarantee the right to vote. This opinion sparked strong dissent from three of the court’s seven justices.

The ballot signature verification measure mandates that election officials compare the signatures on advance mail ballots with those in voter registration records. While the state Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit challenging this measure, the majority rejected arguments from voting rights groups that it violates state constitutional voting rights.

In fact, Justice Caleb Stegall, writing for the majority, said that the dissenting justices wrongly accused the majority of ignoring past precedent, holding that the court has not identified a “fundamental right to vote” within the state constitution.

RELATED COVERAGE

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach participates in a ceremony honoring fallen law enforcement officers at the Statehouse, May 3, 2024, in Topeka, Kan. Kobach's office is accusing two Florida residents of forging signatures on petitions to allow the No Labels part to put its candidates on the ballot, and the two also are accused of doing the same in Florida during an effort to get an abortion rights measure on the ballot there. (AP Photo/John Hanna)

Florida and Kansas are accusing 2 people of forging signatures for petition drives

FILE - A general overall interior view of GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium during the first half of an NFL football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Detroit Lions, Sept. 7, 2023 in Kansas City, Mo. Top Kansas legislators have intensified efforts to woo the Super Bowl champion Chiefs by offering to let the professional football franchise shape a plan for using state bonds to finance a new stadium in Kansas. (AP Photo/Reed Hoffmann, File)

Kansas leaders and new group ramp up efforts to lure the Kansas City Chiefs from Missouri

FILE - Douglas County, Kan., Clerk Jamie Shew discusses the operations of voting drop boxes while giving a tour of his office's warehouse in Lawrence, Kan., March 21, 2022. In the wake of a Kansas Supreme Court ruling that finds voting is not a fundamental right under the state's Bill of Rights, Shew says constant changes in election law are confusing not only to election officials, but to voters. (AP Photo/John Hanna, File)

The Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that voting is not a fundamental right. What’s next for voters?

“It simply is not there,” Stegall wrote.

Justice Eric Rosen, one of the three who dissented, shot back: “It staggers my imagination to conclude Kansas citizens have no fundamental right to vote under their state constitution.”

“I cannot and will not condone this betrayal of our constitutional duty to safeguard the foundational rights of Kansans,” Rosen added.

Conversely, the high court unanimously sided with the challengers of a different provision that makes it a crime for someone to give the appearance of being an election official. Voting rights groups, including Kansas League of Women Voters and the nonprofit Loud Light, argued the measure suppresses free speech and their ability to register voters as some might wrongly assume volunteers are election workers, putting them at risk of criminal prosecution.

Read More: https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-kansas-supreme-court-0a0b5eea5c57cf54a9597d8a6f8a300e

Bar Runs ‘Heterosexual Awesomeness Month’ Promo | DallasExpress

This blog originally appeared at DALLAS EXPRESS.

Local Bar Introduces Special Promotion in Celebration of ‘Heterosexual Awesomeness Month’

The Old State Saloon, nestled in Eagle, Idaho, has ignited a buzz by proclaiming June as “Heterosexual Awesomeness Month.” The establishment took to social media to announce its plans, promising special offers including discounts, complimentary brews, and even hosting a “straight male clothing” competition.

“Join us throughout the month to honor heterosexuals, whose existence is fundamental to us all!” proclaimed the bar in a Facebook post. “Every Monday, dubbed Hetero Male Monday, any heterosexual gentleman dressed in attire befitting his heterosexuality will be treated to a complimentary draft beer. Wednesdays are reserved for Heterosexual Couples Day, with all couples enjoying a 15% discount on their tab.”

Further, Thursdays were designated for all-day happy hour pricing exclusively for heterosexual women.

However, the event triggered a wave of criticism online, with many expressing disapproval of the bar’s stance. Among the dissenting voices was an op-ed published by the Idaho Statesman, condemning the event as a veiled promotion of intolerance.

Responding defiantly, the Old State Saloon stood firm in its position. “1) We cherish our LGBTQ+ patrons! 2) We stand resolute and will not yield to those responding with hostility. 3) ALL are welcome to commemorate heterosexuality with us in June!” declared the establishment.

Despite the backlash, the bar refused to retract its declaration, citing its right to celebrate heterosexuality. The controversy coincided with Pride Month, established in 1970 to celebrate and honor the LGBTQ+ community.

While criticism abounded, there was also notable support for the promotion. The original post garnered over 2,500 comments, with subsequent discussions generating up to 1,000 additional comments.

“Since announcing Hetero Awesomeness Month, we’ve faced significant backlash: theft, vendors refusing service, wedding catering cancellations, and even baseless accusations against the owner,” lamented the bar. “Yet, amidst the chaos, we’ve also received overwhelming support from individuals who appreciate our celebration of ‘Heterosexual Awesomeness Month’ as an expression of freedom and personal values.”

Florida cities fly Pride flags after the GOP’s failed attempt to ban them | LGBTQNation

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ NATION.

“I hope it stands as a beacon for the rest of the state and the entire country.”

After Florida Republicans tried unsuccessfully to pass a law banning government buildings from flying Pride flags earlier this year, several cities around the state hoisted the rainbow stripes over the weekend to mark the start of Pride Month.

Late last year, state Rep. David Borrero (R) introduced legislation aimed at banning flags “that represent a political viewpoint, including, but not limited to, a politically partisan, racial, sexual orientation and gender, or political ideology viewpoint.” House Bill 901 would have prohibited such flags from being displayed not only at schools but also above government buildings and universities.

But the bill died during the most recent legislative session, leaving local governments free to fly Pride flags this month.

On Friday, the city of St. Petersburg got an early start to Pride Month by raising the Progress Pride flag at City Hall. U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL), state Reps. Lindsay Cross (D) and Michele Rayner (D), Mayor Ken Welch (D), and the St. Petersburg City Council attended the flag-raising ceremony.

“Together, by raising the Pride flag at City Hall, our city boldly and unapologetically acts on its commitment to inclusivity, the celebration of diversity, and the simple but profound idea that people should have the freedom to love who they love,” Cross said. “This is in stark contrast to attempts at the state level to stifle our celebrations and to dim the light of beautiful members of our community.”

Cross noted the proposed flag ban and her vote against it. “Gratefully, due to the loud and proud voices that opposed the bill, it did not pass,” she said. “So, this year, as we stand under this Pride flag, we celebrate this small but important victory. Because we should not live in fear of repercussions from safe self-expression.”

“This marks the beginning of a celebration for equal rights for all across St. Petersburg, and I hope it stands as a beacon for the rest of the state and the entire country,” Castor told the crowd.

On Saturday morning, nearly 100 people gathered to see the Progress Pride flag hoisted above the Gulfport Public Library in the city of Gulfport, Pinellas County. The ceremony was attended by Vice Mayor and City Council member Ian O’Hara, members of the city council, Pinellas County Commissioner Charlie Justice, Pinellas County School Board member Caprice Edmond, Gecko Queen Robert Daunch, and candidates for Florida’s 13th Congressional District Whitney Fox and John Liccione.

The same day, the City of Miami raised the Progress Pride flag over its City Hall. “It’s important to understand that it’s a celebration because of how far the LGBTQ community has come,” Commissioner Damian Pardo said in a video posted to the City of Miami’s official X account. “It’s incredibly important to thank the city of Miami for creating a safe space for us in the LGBTQ community.”

The flag-raisings continued on Monday in Tampa and Orlando.

“During Pride Month and year-round, Orlando will continue to show that inclusion, kindness, and compassion are more powerful than divisiveness, hatred, and fear,” Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer wrote in an X post, along with a photo of the intersex-inclusive Progress Pride flag flying over City Hall. “As Mayor, I am proud that our city is a place that values, supports, and welcomes LGBTQ+ residents and visitors.”

“The colors of love and progress are flying high in Orlando as we raise the Progress Pride Flag at Orlando City Hall in celebration of our LGBTQ+ community and their ongoing fight for equality,” read a post on the city’s official X account.

In Tampa on Monday morning, Mayor Jane Castor (D) gave a brief history of the original rainbow Pride flag’s origins before raising the rainbow-striped flag above the city’s Old City Hall.

“It really is a wonderful definition and proclamation of our community and the pride that we have,” Castor said of the flag. Members of Tampa’s LGBTQ+ community “are our police officers, our firefighters, our paramedics, the individuals that protect our country down at MacDill Air Force Base, they are our teachers, our nurses. They are our neighbors, our friends, and our family. It is our community, and we’re very, very proud of that.”

Castor also called on those gathered to “continue to stay focused on ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity and respect” in the face of the recent rise in anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric in Florida and across the nation.

On Tuesday morning, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava (D), County Commissioner Eileen Higgins, and other local leaders will raise the Pride flag about the city’s Stephen P. Clark Government Center. According to a press release, this will mark the fourth consecutive year that the Miami-Dade County government has raised the Pride flag “to reaffirm our commitment to making Miami-Dade an inclusive, welcoming County that celebrates our rich diversity.”

A GOP “library porn” law mandates that a small rural library serve adults only. | LGBTQNation

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ NATION.

The library lacks the space to abide with the legislation and is concerned about lawsuits.

While most people have happy memories of browsing the shelves, going to story hours, or participating in programming at their neighborhood libraries, Donnelly, Idaho, is making the shift to become an adults-only library.

H.B. is the cause of the alteration. 710, often known as the “library porn bill,” states that anyone may use the library if a child is exposed to mature or inappropriate content, provided that the content is kept out of the children’s reach and placed in a designated “adults-only” area.

H.B. “Obscene content” will be “Judged by the average person, applying contemporary community standards,” according to 710.

It appears that the measure also targets LGBT individuals. Many of the books that bill proponents identify as instances of unsuitable material have LGBTQ+ themes or are utilized for sex education, according to Boise State Public Radio.

The law’s supporters dismissed the concerns raised by its opponents, who said that it may be burdensome for smaller libraries. The bill was enacted last month. However, Donnelly Library claims that the space is simply too small for a “adult only” area that is sufficiently isolated from the children’s area.

“Donnelly Library has just 1024 square feet. feet. Because of our size, we are unable to keep our “grown up” literature out of children’s reach. Donnelly Library announced on Facebook that, as of July 1st, “we will be transitioning our Library to be an adult only library as per the legislation.”

The collection of the library is accessible to children enrolled in the paid program whose parents have signed a release. If not, children aren’t even allowed to use the restroom at the library.

“This is a hard change that was not at all what we had anticipated. We want to follow local, state, and federal laws, but due to our size, we also have to safeguard our employees, our library, and public funds,” they added in their letter.

Sherry Scheline of the Donnelly Library stated that they took the call out of concern for a lawsuit that would force the library to close to the public. “We can’t take those chances because we don’t have an attorney on retainer,” the woman stated. We must let someone other than a tiny, rural library to fight it out.

Governor Brad Little (R) vetoed a bill that was similar in 2023. According to him, Idaho libraries and their patrons will “have unintended consequences” as a result of the regulation.

Little stated, “We have many wonderful childhood memories of exploring our local library and losing ourselves in the sea of books and knowledge.”

Gov. Little reportedly stated that he signed the law since the current version reduced the required penalties, according to Boise State Public Radio.

Additionally, Donnelly Library said on Facebook that they will keep up their kid-focused programming, which includes summer learning and after-school activities. “The kids in these specific programs will have the option to sign a programming waiver, which will give the librarians the freedom to choose books carefully for their programs. As usual, the Donnelly Public Library plans its lessons with specific learning objectives in mind and keeps a close eye on what the kids are reading and learning.

In order to refurbish and enlarge the building and establish enough space between the adult and children’s sections to comply with the H.B., Donnelly Library requested donations. 710.

According to the Donnelly Library, they “will continue to serve our community to the best of our ability” for the time being.

Entering the state capital, demonstrators ask that the governor shield transgender children. | LGBTQNation

Four anti-trans bills are the target of the protests, which call for the governor to veto them.

Chris Sununu's headshot

Protests over measures that target transgender people erupted in front of the New Hampshire State House on Wednesday.

With posters like “Let Trans Kids Live” and “#letkidsplay,” the activists formed a line outside the building in an attempt to persuade Governor Chris Sununu (R) to veto four measures that pose a threat to transgender adolescents.

Grace Murray, Political Director of the New Hampshire Youth Movement, stated, “Back in 2018, Gov. Sununu chose to do the right thing and protect trans people in NH from discrimination.” She was alluding to the year that Sununu signed HB 1319, an anti-discrimination bill, into law. “It’s time for him to do the right thing again and veto these bills now that several horrifying, discriminatory pieces of legislation have reached his desk,” Murray continued.

Murrau went on, “NH is the ‘live free or die’ state, and those values should apply to everyone.” “Transgender individuals ought to be free to live in this state without having their rights violated on a regular basis. Gov. Sununu must veto these legislation in order to protect the liberties that we value highly in New Hampshire.

Alissandra Murray, a Democratic state lawmaker, told NBC 5 that “we need him to know that he needs to stand up like he did in 2018.” He asserted that acting in that manner was morally correct both then and now.

The governor allegedly received a petition from the protestors, but he declined to meet with them. The demonstrators were forced to go inside the building in response to his denial in order to keep calling for him to veto the laws.

Speaking to NBC 5, Sununu stated, “I think the voices around fairness and safety are being heard not just here in New Hampshire, but all across the country.” And this is something we’re going to treat with extreme seriousness.

A measure called HB 1205 would prohibit trans girls from participating in girls’ sports from the fifth to the twelfth grades. The law would demand birth certificates as verification of the biological sex of student-athletes. Additionally, kids and families who think a transgender athlete plays for a girls’ team would be able to sue the state and school under the proposed law.

The mild “Don’t Say Gay” bill, HB 1312, requires teachers to provide parents with a two-week notice to opt out of any curriculum that includes references to “sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression.” The measure designates this content as “objectionable.”

Gender affirming surgery is prohibited for minors under HB 619. Notably, gender-affirming procedures are nearly never performed on minors, unless, following years of medical treatment, both parents and doctors determine that the procedure is medically essential.

In a single day, these three bills were passed.

The most recent bill to reach the governor’s desk is HB 396, which would practically forbid transgender persons from using public restrooms and threatens to revoke the legal status of transgender people. Many are worried that this measure undoes some of the non-discrimination provisions of HB 1319, a bill from 2018.

Regarding LGBTQ+ rights, Sununu has a conflicted past. She has blocked anti-trans measures in the past and opposed a plan that would have made legal transitioning easier.

“I fundamentally don’t believe that biological boys should be competing in girls’ sports,” he stated in March. I believe it to be risky.

His vote on these proposals is still up in the air.

According to Ezra Brown, Community Press Liaison for the New Hampshire Youth Movement, “the people want Sununu to keep his word.” “He made it very clear in 2018: It is morally right to defend the rights and safety of trans people.”

“We implore him to veto these harmful bills as written. We will never forget what he does for us right now, nor what he did for us in the past. The populace remembers things well.

In California, conservatives attempted to compel all schools to expel transgender students. They simply weren’t successful. | LGBTQNation

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ NATION.

LGBTQ+ activists are having a party.

Conservative activists in California are frustrated that their bill, which would have mandated that schools accept transgender students, did not receive enough signatures to be included on the ballot in November.

“We would have easily qualified for the ballot if we had a little more time and a little more money,” the initiative’s leader, Roseville school board member Jonathan Zachreson, told the LA Times.

If the bill had been approved, schools would have been obligated to notify parents if a student adopted a new pronoun or nickname while attending class, or if they requested to use facilities unrelated to their official sex. The bill also forbade the state from providing kids with care that is gender affirming.

Although some states have already implemented similar policies, California has traditionally supported young people who identify as transgender. Governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed legislation in 2022 designating the state as a safe haven for transgender minors and their families.

According to Zachreson, the measure’s campaign gathered $200,000 to assist in obtaining the 546,651 signatures required for it to be placed on the ballot. However, the campaign had only collected 400,000 signatures before yesterday’s deadline.

The activists wanted the ballot measure to be named the “Protect Kids of California Act of 2024,” despite the fact that their initiative would have jeopardized the safety of trans children with unsupportive parents who might abuse or kick them out of the house if they discover they have not been adhering to their assigned sex while attending school. Earlier this year, the activists sued California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) for naming their ballot measure the “Restricts Rights of Transgender Youth Initiative.”

The judge dismissed the case after originally siding with Bonta, stating that the measure’s name, “Restrict Rights of Transgender Youth Initiative,” accurately describes it.

LGBTQ+ activists, meanwhile, applauded the measure’s defeat.

Equality California Executive Director Tony Hoang released a statement saying, “We are relieved that anti-LGBTQ+ extremists have failed to reach the required signature threshold to qualify their anti-transgender ballot initiatives to the November 2024 ballot.” “Equality California will not stop fighting for the rights of LGBTQ+ youth around the globe and opposing any and all attempts by radical organizations to discriminate against them.”

A right-wing influencer was compelled to pay a Black drag queen $1.1 million after lying about | LGBTQNation

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ NATION.

Once the death threats began, the drag queen felt she had “no choice” but to file a lawsuit.

The right was protesting drag shows across the nation during Pride Month in 2022, calling the queens “groomers” and worse. To “prove” that drag queens shouldn’t be permitted to perform in public, conservative influencer Summer Bushnell shared a doctored video of a drag queen purportedly exposing herself to children.

She is now required to pay $1.1 million in damages for slandering drag performer Mona Liza Million, who, when not in drag, goes by Eric Posey.

In 2022, Bushnell wrote on Facebook, “Why did no one arrest the man in a dress who flashed his genitalia to minors and people in the crowd?” in reference to Posey’s Pride performance in Idaho. “There is video and no one commented on it. I’ll provide a hazy video to demonstrate it.

It turns out that the reason “no one said anything about it” is that it never did. Posey was completely clothed in the “blurred video” she shared, but it was obscured enough for the thousands of viewers to miss that fact.

After reading Bushnell’s post, people began reporting Posey to the Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, police. None of the allegations, according to the police, came from anybody who were present while Posey performed.

The City of Coeur d’Alene Prosecuting Attorney’s Office issued a statement following their assessment of the original, unblurred footage, stating that the evidence did not support the charges of indecent exposure or other crimes. As a result, prosecution is dismissed.

However, that did not quiet the internet backlash. Posey said at trial that he got death threats and that images from Bushnell’s doctored video of him became a symbol utilized by the right in their quest to get drag shows outlawed.

Conservative influencers such as Chaya Raichik, the creator of Libs of TikTok, have dedicated their careers to accusing LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly drag artists, of “grooming” youngsters. However, Bushnell’s attempt to make the same accusation was met with opposition. Posey made the decision to sue her for slander.

In September 2022, he stated in a press statement, “It is now my turn to speak after three months of silence.” “Provocateurs have persisted in circulating the manipulated video of my performance even after I was found not guilty, spreading hate speech against the LGBTQIA+ community throughout the state and damaging my reputation.”

“I am forced to pursue legal action in order to punish the people who spread the lies accountable for their deeds. I’m hoping that this civil lawsuit will end the divisive misinformation efforts being carried out in Idaho.

This summer, Coeur d’Alene’s Pride in the Park garnered national notice when police detained 31 members of the Patriot Front, a group that supports white supremacists, as they attempted to disrupt the celebration. Bushnell, according to Posey, tried to take advantage of that attention.

Bushnell’s attorney attempted to claim that although his client’s acts were “almost” defamatory, they didn’t quite fit the criteria.

Bushnell’s admission that she never saw Posey expose himself was even worse for the defense. In other words, she knew she was lying and wasn’t in error.

After the decision on Friday, Posey declared, “The judicial system did what needed to be done.” Imagine yourself alone and in a dark hole, feeling as though everyone is ignoring you. However, you found yourself surrounded by warriors—true Idahoans, not transplants—who were native to this land. I am lucky to be surrounded by those who have encouraged and uplifted me.

The jury debated for three and a half hours this past Friday during the five-day trial, according to The Guardian. The judge informed the jury that they were unable to compel Bushnell to remove the Facebook post and issue a public apology. The video is still accessible on the social media network.


GOP attorney general targets therapists working with trans adolescents for investigation | LGBTQNation

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ NATION.

He’s seeking to acquire more access to children’ medical records.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is continuing his battle against gender-affirming care for trans adolescents, now targeting social workers and therapists who work with LGBTQ+ youth for inquiry.

According to Missouri Independent, Bailey has acquired unredacted and loosely redacted medical records of trans children through the state inquiry into the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital.

He’s also attempting to acquire access from the university’s digital medical records system. Bailey previously imposed harsh limitations on gender-affirming care via an emergency ruling that was overturned last May and investigated Planned Parenthood to get access to medical data of children who got gender-affirming care from the organization.

Katy Erker-Lynch is the executive director of PROMO, an LGBTQ+ advocacy group in Missouri. She claimed that “the attorney general has created a hostile environment for medical providers where they are afraid to stay and practice medicine.”

Bailey has allegedly talked to 57 healthcare professionals as a part of the probe. One of those people is licensed clinical social worker Kelly Storck, who spoke with senior investigator Nick McBroom. McBroom brought with him a file of letters Storck had written to Washington University Transgender Care, supporting patients who desired to get gender-affirming care at the hospital.

McBroom asked Storck to describe in detail her methodology for prescribing gender-affirming, but she declined to. The case was subsequently concluded but left Storck with residual skepticism.

“I still have a lot of distrust about who initiated it and who was in my documents,” she stated.

Levi is a 17-year-old trans teenager who received care at the clinic. His mother, Becky Hormuth, claimed the probe was invasive and disturbing to the family’s lives.

“The state has already basically disrupted our lives,” Hormuth said. “They’ve disrupted our families, our children’s lives with the legislation that has passed. Then for him to continue going on is even more invasive and damaging.”

According to Hormuth, “the state has already essentially disrupted our lives.” “The legislation that has been passed has caused disruptions in our families and our children’s lives.” Therefore, it is even more intrusive and harmful for him to carry on.

Bailey enacted an emergency order extending Missouri’s restriction on gender-affirming care for minors to transgender adults after the state approved a law prohibiting it for minors. He argued in the policy document that gender-affirming care for transgender individuals can “pose very serious side effects” and “lack solid evidentiary support.” After state politicians intervened, he revoked the rule.

In June 2023, Missouri Governor Mike Parson (R) enacted the prohibition. Despite a swift legal appeal, the judge upheld the ban’s implementation.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑