The legislation revises the state code to incorporate “educational neglect,” encompassing the failure to instruct children on restroom usage

Truthout serves as an invaluable asset for activists, movement leaders, and workers globally. Your swift donation can help sustain this vital work.

A proposed amendment to the existing Kentucky legislation aims to hold parents accountable for neglect if their transgender children do not adhere to the restroom usage specified by their birth certificates, potentially leading to the removal of children from their homes.

Though the bill itself does not explicitly mention transgender children, it pertains to existing state code concerning restroom and locker room usage in schools. Without prior knowledge of Senate Bill 150, passed into law in March of the previous year, these alterations might go unnoticed.

Allison Chapman, a legislative tracker and transgender activist, appears to be the first to highlight these proposed changes to state law, sharing the information on social media on Tuesday night.

Kentucky is considering a bill that could result in the REMOVAL OF TRANS YOUTH from their homes if they fail to comply with the state’s school restroom regulations, while also charging their parents with NEGLECT,” Chapman exclaimed, alongside screenshots of the draft legislation.

Proposed by Republican state Representative Jason Petrie, the bill aims to broaden Kentucky’s definition of child neglect to encompass “educational neglect,” incorporating a parent’s failure to ensure their child adheres to the current anti-trans restroom legislation. If a child consistently disregards the exclusionary restroom regulations, the state reserves the authority to remove them from their home. Experts have highlighted the severe harm these restrictions pose to transgender children.

Chapman further explained that the subtlety of the bill made it easy to overlook, requiring familiarity with SB150, which was enacted the previous year.

Even without the proposed amendments enabling child removal, the current law is highly restrictive. It not only regulates restroom and locker room use but also prohibits physicians from providing gender-affirming care treatments to transgender youth. These treatments, hailed as lifesaving by medical experts and recipients, are essential for their well-being.

The ACLU has labeled the law as one of the most severe targeting transgender individuals nationwide. While a federal judge initially halted its enforcement last year, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals intervened, allowing the law to be enforced until the lawsuit’s resolution. In November, the ACLU petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn this decision.

This blog originally appeared at BBC.

Share Message – Jesse Baird: Policeman charged with murder of missing Sydney couple

A 28-year-old police officer has been charged with murdering missing Australian TV personality Jesse Baird and his boyfriend Luke Davies.

Investigators initiated a frantic search on Wednesday following the discovery of bloodied belongings belonging to the couple in a bin near Sydney. Beaumont Lamarre-Condon, the former boyfriend of Baird, was pursued by law enforcement and surrendered himself on Friday. Despite ongoing efforts, detectives have yet to locate the bodies of the men or determine the cause of their demise.

Authorities allege that the couple met their demise on Monday within Jesse Baird’s residence in Paddington, an inner suburb of Sydney, before their remains were transported in a white van. Witnesses reported hearing “shouting” and a “verbal argument” on the morning of the incident, with CCTV footage capturing the rented van’s presence at the scene later that evening. The van was discovered in Sydney’s southern region on Friday morning.

New South Wales Police reported the discovery of a bullet resembling one from Beaumont Lamarre-Condon’s service-issued firearm at the crime scene in Paddington, alongside a “significant” volume of blood and overturned furniture. Although Lamarre-Condon failed to report to work on Tuesday, his service pistol was subsequently located in a secure facility at a police station, as confirmed by Detective Superintendent Daniel Doherty during a press briefing.

Additionally, authorities have seized blood-stained garments, a mobile phone, and credit cards from an industrial bin in Cronulla, situated 28 kilometers (17 miles) from the scene of the crime, as well as various items from a residence in Balmain. Detective Superintendent Doherty noted that Lamarre-Condon was believed to have traveled to Newcastle – approximately 170 kilometers north of the crime scene – following the alleged homicides.

Detective Superintendent Doherty remarked that while information provided by Beaumont Lamarre-Condon thus far had not significantly aided the investigation, tips from the public had proven invaluable. He reiterated the plea for individuals with relevant information to come forward and cooperate with law enforcement.

Highlighting the significance of locating the victims’ bodies, Detective Superintendent Doherty emphasized the importance of providing closure for the families and uncovering the circumstances surrounding their demise, acknowledging their profound grief.

Jesse Baird had previously served as a presenter and red carpet reporter on Network 10’s morning program Studio 10 until its cancellation in December, while Mr. Davies worked as a flight attendant for Qantas. Their social media accounts, adorned with joyful photographs, have been inundated with expressions of sympathy following their disappearance.

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon, who joined the police force in 2019, had previously garnered attention as a celebrity blogger, boasting encounters with stars such as Taylor Swift, Harry Styles, and Miley Cyrus. His interactions with celebrities were extensively covered by Australian media, with some publications even questioning whether he was “Australia’s biggest fan.”

Detective Superintendent Doherty refrained from speculating on the motive behind the alleged crimes. However, he noted that Beaumont Lamarre-Condon’s relationship with Jesse Baird had ended “a couple of months ago,” suggesting it as a plausible avenue of investigation.

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon was denied bail and appeared in court on Friday afternoon to face charges.

This blog originally appeared at BUSSINESS INSIDER.

From Red to Blue: A Journey of Political Realization and Healthcare Struggles in Texas, Leading to a Return to Oregon

Jules Rogers relocated to Houston for employment but departed due to disagreements with the local political landscape, particularly concerning relaxed gun regulations and restrictive laws governing women’s healthcare decisions. Additionally, factors such as transportation expenses, adverse weather conditions, and complexities in the voting process further influenced her decision to leave.

Although I was born in Houston, I spent my formative years in Portland, Oregon. In 2018, I returned to Texas as an adult to take a job at a local newspaper. While Houston offered a lower cost of living and proximity to family, the reality didn’t quite match the nostalgic memories of visiting Grandma for Christmas. After encountering several eye-opening experiences that clashed with my envisioned quality of life, I made the decision to leave approximately two years later.

I became aware of an issue with a local school district that I couldn’t believe

A concerned parent contacted my newsroom to report that her child’s school district was segregating students learning English as a second language, placing them in a building across a major highway from the school.

Initially skeptical, I reached out to the school district for clarification and was dismayed to discover that the reports were indeed accurate. I found the situation deeply unjust. Although my paper published the story I wrote, it received limited readership.

This incident was just one of many experiences I encountered as a journalist in a predominantly conservative city. These stories, unlike my previous work in Oregon, challenged me to maintain objectivity and separate my personal convictions from my professional duties.

Gun laws were loosened

In September 2019, the state’s gun laws underwent revisions by the local legislature, which were perceived as regressive. HB 1143 granted licensed gun holders the authority to store firearms, handguns, and ammunition in locked cars within school-campus parking lots. Additionally, the legislation removed the prohibition of guns from large religious gathering areas such as churches and synagogues.

I hold the belief that increasing the presence of firearms does not contribute to safer environments in the face of shootings. Many other countries implement policies aimed at tightening gun regulations, suggesting opportunities for improvement in our approach to gun control.

The voting process was outdated

For the first time since I began casting my ballots by mail in Oregon, I voted in person. In Texas, voting by mail is restricted to those over 65, individuals who are ill or disabled, incarcerated, or meeting specific criteria.

Although my white-collar company provided a day off for voting, which was considered a perk, I realized that many shift workers likely did not enjoy this privilege. Standing in a physical line for hours, I was surprised to find that “materials,” including my newspaper with annotated campaign officials and bill details, were prohibited upon reaching the front of the room.

Contrasting my voting experience in Portland, where I have ample time to research each item before marking my ballot and receive text notifications at each processing step, the voting machines I encountered in Houston felt outdated, and I received no form of receipt.

I didn’t feel in control of my own body

During my time living in Texas, the state’s abortion restrictions were intensifying, culminating in the overturning of Roe v. Wade. This mirrored Texas’ stringent approach to cannabis, in stark contrast to Oregon’s decriminalization policies, with many individuals fervently supporting abortion bans.

One Saturday evening in Texas, I attended a Right to Life dinner at the invitation of a City Council member, unaware of the atmosphere I would encounter. A talented teenage student delivered a meticulously rehearsed speech, painting a picture of aborted embryos or fetuses potentially becoming astronauts, presidents, or cancer-curing doctors. Despite her youth, I couldn’t help but wish for her to aspire to those achievements herself.

Every individual should have the autonomy to safeguard their body, boundaries, and home. Yet, in Texas, I felt vulnerable amidst the politicization surrounding my reproductive rights. The prospect of a pregnant woman in Texas being denied care for conditions as severe as sepsis unless her life is directly threatened, subjected to the judgment of a board, was daunting. These were odds I couldn’t reconcile with, even as someone not desiring children, ultimately contributing to my decision to leave Texas prior to the abortion ban implementation.

I knew when it was time for me to go

In addition to the political-environment mismatch, other reasons contributed to my move.

I lived in a suburb of Houston and traveled on highways daily. I didn’t like the high transportation costs, including toll roads and all the gas needed to make my commute.

The extreme weather, which included hurricanes, major lightning storms, hail, and smoggy air, was also not aligned with the quality of life I desired.

I loved the radio stations, the Tex-Mex, and the barbecue — and I was earning more money — but I knew when it was time to go. It’s more expensive, but I’m happier in Portland.

It comes as little surprise, particularly when considering the demographic often referred to as the ‘school shooting generation,’ a group of young individuals deeply affected by the prevalence of such tragedies.

A considerable number of Americans tend to remain within the borders of the United States, their travels often limited to iconic destinations like Niagara Falls or indulgent trips to savor pasta in Italy for a brief vacation. Moreover, many opt to stay rooted in their hometowns, as evidenced by a striking 72% of individuals over 25 years old still residing in or near their birthplace, as per a 2019 survey.

However, there appears to be a shifting trend, particularly among Generation Z, indicating a willingness to venture beyond American shores. A recent survey conducted by Preply, a platform facilitating language learning through tutor connections, sought the opinions of 3,000 Gen Z Americans regarding their inclination towards expatriation. When asked to rate their likelihood of residing outside the U.S. on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very strongly), the average response was 3.1, signaling a leaning towards international relocation.

Among the primary motivations cited by respondents for considering a move abroad, the appeal of better social programs such as universal healthcare stood out significantly, with 25.6% highlighting this aspect. This sentiment is understandable, given the weight of medical debt burdening many Americans. Additionally, the allure of new cultural experiences (18.9%), the cost of living (18%), and dissatisfaction with American political dynamics (17.7%) contributed to the attractiveness of foreign locales. Notably, one issue deeply intertwined with American politics—gun violence—did not escape the attention of Gen Z. A majority of respondents, accounting for 59%, identified it as a “major” factor influencing their desire to seek residence outside the U.S.

It’s a pragmatic perspective that underscores the significant impact of gun violence on Gen Z, who have been raised amidst school shooting drills and a constant awareness of the looming threat of violence—be it in classrooms, movie theaters, or concert venues. This reality has earned them the moniker of the “school shooting generation.” Unlike any previous generation, they have borne the brunt of numerous tragic mass shootings, whether as direct witnesses or through the pervasive influence of these events on their lives. Unfortunately, the problem persists unabated. In 2023 alone, there were more mass shootings than days, as reported by the Gun Violence Archive. Notably, much of the activism surrounding this issue emanates from Gen Z, exemplified by movements like March for Our Lives, which was initiated by survivors of school shootings.

While the United States grapples with several pressing and disquieting challenges, particularly of a financial nature, for Gen Z, the survey indicates that gun violence emerges as the most urgent concern. It’s a matter of life and death, underscored by stark statistics revealing that gun violence has become the leading cause of death for young Americans, surpassing even cancer, car accidents, homicide, and suicide.

Given this sobering reality, the notion of seeking refuge elsewhere might not be as extreme as it initially appears. For Gen Z, the desire for a life free from the omnipresent threat of gun violence could very well be the driving force behind such considerations.