Florida’s surgeon general defies scientific consensus amid measles outbreak | The Washington Post

This blog originally appeared at THE WASHINGTON POST.

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo in 2021.

As a Florida elementary school grapples with a growing measles outbreak, the state’s top health official is providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus, potentially putting unvaccinated children at risk of contracting one of the most contagious pathogens on Earth, according to clinicians and public health experts.

In a letter to parents at a Fort Lauderdale-area school following six confirmed measles cases, Florida Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo failed to urge parents to vaccinate their children or to keep unvaccinated students home as a precaution.

Instead of following the “normal” recommendation that parents keep unvaccinated children home for up to 21 days — the incubation period for measles — Ladapo stated that the state health department “is deferring to parents or guardians to make decisions about school attendance.”

Ladapo’s controversial decision continues a pattern of defying public health norms, especially regarding vaccines. Last month, he called for halting the use of mRNA coronavirus vaccines, a move widely condemned by the public health community.

Ben Hoffman, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, criticized Florida’s guidance, stating that it contradicts longstanding and widely accepted public health recommendations for measles, a disease that can lead to severe complications, including death.

“It contradicts everything I’ve ever heard and read,” Hoffman stated. “It goes against our policy and what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would recommend.”

In 2024, measles outbreaks have surged, with the CDC recording at least 26 cases across 12 states, doubling the count from the previous year. Apart from the six cases identified in the Florida school, instances have been documented in Arizona, California, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York City, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

The surge in measles outbreaks is attributed to the increasing number of parents seeking exemptions from childhood vaccinations. This trend has emerged in the wake of political opposition to COVID-19 mandates and widespread dissemination of misinformation regarding vaccine safety.

In January, the CDC issued a caution to healthcare providers to remain vigilant for additional measles cases. Contagion can occur from four days before the onset of a rash until four days after.

Because measles virus particles can persist in the air and on surfaces for up to two hours after an infected individual departs, up to 90 percent of non-immune individuals may contract measles if exposed. Those who have been infected or have received both doses of the MMR vaccine are 98 percent protected and highly unlikely to contract the disease. This is why public health officials usually recommend vaccination during outbreaks.

“The measles outbreak in Florida schools is a result of too many parents failing to ensure their children are protected by the safe and effective measles vaccine,” explained John P. Moore, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medical College. “And why is that? It’s because anti-vaccine sentiment in Florida is propagated from the top of the public health hierarchy: Joseph Ladapo.”

When requested for comment, the Florida health department provided a link to Ladapo’s letter.

Ladapo’s reluctance to utilize public health measures mirrors the efforts of conservative and libertarian factions to weaken public health’s capacity to control diseases such as the highly contagious measles. In an outbreak in Ohio that commenced in late 2022, most of the 85 afflicted children were eligible for vaccination, but their parents opted against it, according to officials. In 2021, the state legislature curtailed health officials’ authority to mandate quarantine for individuals suspected of having an infectious disease.

Ladapo’s communication with parents arrives amidst increased concern regarding the public health impacts of anti-vaccine sentiment, an ongoing issue that has resulted in declines in childhood immunization rates in various areas across the United States. Federal data released last year revealed that the percentage of kindergartners exempted from at least one state-required childhood vaccination reached its highest level yet during the 2022-2023 school year, standing at 3 percent.

According to Paul Offit, a pediatric infectious diseases expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Ladapo’s neglect to promote vaccination puts children at risk.

“In light of the data showing measles as the most contagious vaccine-preventable disease, surpassing even influenza or COVID, is Ladapo attempting to suggest otherwise?” Offit questioned in an email.

Measles is highly contagious, spreading swiftly, particularly affecting young children who receive their first dose of the vaccine between 12 to 15 months of age. The CDC advises two doses of the MMR vaccine, with the second typically administered between 4 to 6 years old.

When measles vaccination coverage falls below 95 percent, it undermines herd immunity, facilitating the virus’s rapid spread. While Florida’s overall vaccination coverage stands at 90.6 percent, it doesn’t pinpoint areas with potentially lower coverage rates.

If unvaccinated individuals fail to adhere to public health guidelines and stay home from school during the contagious period, the outbreak could escalate dramatically, posing a significant community risk. Patsy Stinchfield, President of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases and a nurse practitioner in Minneapolis, has firsthand experience managing measles outbreaks, including the 2017 outbreak in Minnesota, which impacted 75 individuals, predominantly unvaccinated children.

Approximately 1 in 5 unvaccinated individuals in the United States who contract measles require hospitalization, as reported by the CDC. Among children, up to 1 out of 20 develop pneumonia, which is the leading cause of death from measles in this age group. Additionally, around 1 child out of every 1,000 with measles experiences brain swelling, which can result in seizures and long-term consequences such as deafness or intellectual disability. Unvaccinated infants who contract measles face an even graver risk, with 1 in 600 developing a fatal neurological complication that may remain latent for years.

This week, officials at Manatee Bay Elementary School, located approximately 20 miles west of Fort Lauderdale, confirmed six cases of measles. According to Broward County Schools Superintendent Peter B. Licata, out of the school’s 1,067 students, 33 have not been vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. During a school board meeting on Wednesday, Licata provided this information. Additionally, a district official mentioned that the district has organized “four vaccination opportunities,” comprising two sessions held at the school and two at other venues within the community.

Florida health officials reported the first case on Friday, involving a third-grade child with no travel history abroad.

School officials redirected inquiries to the Broward County school district, which stated it is adhering to guidance from the state health department.

This municipality recently designated itself as a sanctuary for LGBTQ+ individuals.

The regulation safeguards rights to gender-affirming care and asserts that LGBTQ+ identity is not a disorder or illness.


In a 6-1 vote this past Monday, the Columbia, Missouri City Council officially designated the city as a sanctuary for LGBTQ+ individuals. The council meeting was well-attended, with numerous supporters backing the initiative.

Councilmember Roy Lovelady remarked, “We received input from every district in Columbia.”

The ordinance asserts Columbia as a supportive environment for individuals advocating for LGBTQ+ rights. It deems the enforcement of a 2023 state law prohibiting gender-affirming care as the least prioritized for law enforcement within the city. Furthermore, it outlines protocols for collaborating with other jurisdictions attempting to prosecute individuals seeking or facilitating gender-affirming care.

“The City Council asserts that LGBTQ identity is not a disorder, ailment, sickness, deficiency, or inadequacy, and pledges to seek methods to enhance societal outcomes for LGBTQ residents of Columbia,” states the ordinance.

City councilmember Nick Knoth expressed, “It’s regrettable that we must even contemplate this.”

“The LGBTQ+ community is already a minority group in the United States, so having our voices acknowledged, that sense of recognition and safety, is profoundly significant,” emphasized NClusion+ co-founder Anthony Plogger. “It’s absolutely essential.”

According to ABC 17, numerous transgender students from the University of Missouri shared accounts of being bullied and expressed that the ordinance would provide them with a greater sense of security.

“At a meeting, a transgender man recounted the incident of Noah Ruiz, a young transgender man from Camden, Ohio, who was assaulted by three cisgender men in July 2022 after using a women’s restroom,” the transgender individual stated. “Despite explaining to them that he was instructed by the facility owner to use the women’s restroom due to his assigned female gender at birth, his attackers did not relent. Instead, they hurled homophobic slurs at him while assaulting him.”

Councilmember Don Waterman cast the sole dissenting vote against the ordinance. While he expressed agreement with its objectives, he voiced skepticism regarding its effectiveness in mitigating bullying or hate crimes within the city.

“I don’t perceive a necessity for this ordinance,” he stated.

Opponents of the ordinance argued that it would infringe upon their freedom to express their religious beliefs.

Reversal of Roe v. Wade Prompts Exodus from Conservative States

This blog originally appeared at NBC News.

Economic Ramifications of Roe v. Wade on Various Sectors


The author argues that the challenges faced by universities and companies are wrongly attributed to a lack of available talent due to Roe v. Wade. In my view, this perspective is flawed. The declining birth rate is more likely a consequence of inadequate support for parents from both our society and the government.


Childcare and healthcare expenses are exorbitant, placing the majority of the burden on women. Young couples and women are apprehensive about residing in locations where complications during pregnancy could lead to severe health consequences. Personally, I’m aware of several individuals of childbearing age who are relocating from Missouri for work or education due to these concerns.

Physicians are departing from conservative states due to concerns about potential lawsuits. Military families are reluctant to be stationed in states governed by Republicans. I’m aware of a business owner losing a prospective employee precisely for this reason.


The assertion in the letter that Catholic Church institutions are not experiencing a decline in membership due to the Church’s stance on abortion is absurd. Many students at Catholic universities are not Catholic, and churches along with their affiliated grade schools are shuttering throughout the region.


One of the numerous reasons the Church struggles to retain or draw in members is its outdated perspective. If individuals disagree with abortion, they can choose not to undergo one. For men who hold a different view, the solution is to avoid impregnating a woman. However, imposing restrictive laws to control women’s reproductive choices should cease.

A Missouri school board, which had previously revoked an anti-racism resolution, has now eliminated Black history classes.

This blog originally appeared at AP News.


A Missouri school board, led by conservatives, has decided to eliminate elective courses on Black history and literature, following the rescinding of an anti-discrimination policy adopted five months earlier in the wake of George Floyd’s killing.


In a 5-2 vote on Thursday night, the Francis Howell School Board decided to discontinue offering Black History and Black Literature courses, which had been part of the curriculum at the district’s three high schools since 2021. Over 100 students enrolled in these courses this semester in the predominantly white suburban area of St. Louis.

In July, the board rescinded an anti-racism resolution and directed the removal of copies from school buildings. This resolution had been implemented in August 2020 during the nationwide unrest following the killing of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis.


The resolution committed the Francis Howell community to “strongly oppose any racism, discrimination, and unjust violence against individuals, irrespective of their race, ethnicity, nationality, immigration status, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or ability.”


The resolution and the available courses became a focus for five recently elected board members, who gained control since last year’s election and in April, supported by the conservative political action committee Francis Howell Families. All seven members of the board are of Caucasian descent.


The PAC’s website vehemently opposes the courses, claiming they incorporate principles of critical race theory. However, numerous experts assert that the scholarly theory, which focuses on the idea that racism is systemic in the nation’s institutions, is not taught in K-12 schools.


The resolution and course offerings faced opposition from the five new board members who assumed control since their election last year, backed by the conservative political action committee Francis Howell Families. All seven board members are white. The PAC’s website strongly opposes the courses, claiming they involve principles of critical race theory, though many experts assert that the scholarly theory, centered on the idea that racism is systemic in the nation’s institutions, is not taught in K-12 schools.


“You’ve certainly taught me not to underestimate how low you will go to show your disdain toward the Black and brown communities’ experiences and existence,” remarked Harry Harris, a Black father, addressing the board.

Another speaker, Tom Ferri, urged the board to prioritize more significant issues, such as addressing the high turnover among teachers.

“Tapping into a diverse talent pipeline would be an excellent strategy to mitigate attrition, but who from a diverse background would want to work in a district embroiled in culture wars?”


Board Vice President Randy Cook Jr., elected in 2022, stated that the Francis Howell courses, which he and others opposed, employed “Social Justice Standards” developed by the Southern Poverty Law Center with an inclination toward activism.

“I don’t oppose teaching Black history and Black literature, but I do object to teaching it through a social justice framework,” Cook expressed in an email on Friday. “I don’t believe it’s the public school’s responsibility to teach social justice and activism.”


In an email, district spokesperson Jennifer Jolls mentioned that new courses on Black history and literature “could be redeveloped and brought to the Board for approval in the future.”


During this semester, a total of 60 students across the three schools enrolled in the Black History course, while 42 students took Black Literature, as reported by the district.


Francis Howell is one of the largest school districts in Missouri, serving 16,647 students, with 7.7% of the student population identified as Black. The district is located on the far western edge of the St. Louis area, in St. Charles County.


The county’s substantial growth has aligned with the significant population decrease in St. Louis city. In 1960, St. Louis boasted 750,000 residents, while St. Charles County had 53,000. Presently, St. Louis is home to 293,000 residents, with a nearly equal distribution between Black and white residents. St. Charles County has experienced growth, reaching around 415,000 residents, with approximately 6% identifying as Black.


Racial tensions persist in the St. Louis area, heightened more than nine years ago when an 18-year-old named Michael Brown was fatally shot by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. The officer, Darren Wilson, faced no charges, triggering months of sometimes violent protests and serving as a catalyst for the nationwide Black Lives Matter movement.

In July, Cook defended the decision to revoke the anti-racism resolution, stating that the board “doesn’t need to be in the business of dividing the community.”


“We need to focus on educating students and steer clear of national politics,” he remarked.


The Black Literature course centers on contemporary and multi-genre literary works by Black authors, celebrating the dignity and identity of Black voices, as described by the district.

The Black History course delves into the roots of today’s world, providing a comprehensive understanding of the present through the history of Blacks. It spans from the ancient civilizations of Africa to the contemporary accomplishments and achievements of Black individuals today, according to the course description.


Since 2020, school board elections in the U.S. have evolved into highly charged political arenas, particularly in response to policies addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.


Political Action Committees (PACs) in numerous local districts have effectively supported candidates who pledged to combat teachings related to race and sexuality, eliminate books considered offensive, and oppose transgender-inclusive sports teams.

Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors is in effect

This blog originally appeared at Pink News.

A ban on gender-affirming care for minors has officially come into effect in the state of Missouri.

The recently enacted legislation, referred to as the Missouri Save Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act, places restrictions on healthcare providers regarding the provision of gender-affirming care to minors for gender transition purposes. This law, effective immediately, prohibits healthcare providers from administering evidence-based treatments such as puberty blockers or hormones to minors unless they had already started such treatment prior to August 28, 2023. Furthermore, the legislation also forbids minors from undergoing gender-affirming surgeries, although it’s important to note that such procedures are typically not offered to children by healthcare providers.

Under this law, which is set to expire in August 2027, healthcare providers found in violation will face the revocation of their professional licenses. It’s worth noting that gender-affirming healthcare encompasses age-appropriate treatments aimed at alleviating the symptoms of gender dysphoria or distress in transgender and non-binary individuals. This type of care is endorsed by all major medical associations in the United States.

There exists a wealth of compelling evidence affirming the medical safety of this care, as well as its positive impact on the mental well-being of eligible individuals who undergo it.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a civil rights organization, had initiated a legal challenge aimed at overturning the new healthcare ban in an effort to halt its implementation. However, their hopes were dashed last week when a judge ruled against them, permitting the law to take effect as originally planned.

The judge’s decision was based on the belief that there wasn’t sufficient evidence to warrant a preliminary injunction, which the ACLU had requested. The medical and scientific evidence presented in court was deemed “conflicting and unclear.”

It’s important to note that while individuals aged 18 and older can still access gender-affirming care in Missouri, this care is not covered by Medicaid. Additionally, those in correctional facilities face significant restrictions in receiving such treatment.

Tom Bastian, representing the ACLU, commented on the judge’s ruling, stating, “Although we are disappointed with the court’s decision, we remain committed to defending the rights of transgender individuals in Missouri and will continue our efforts to do so.”

In the midst of these developments, Yamelsie Rodriguez, the CEO of Planned Parenthood in Southwest Missouri, expressed her concerns, stating, “Transgender and gender-expansive youth in Missouri are facing the distressing prospect of having their rights stripped away, unless a higher court steps in to intervene. They are grappling with fear and anger over Missouri politicians employing ideology and unsubstantiated science to deny them essential healthcare and to invalidate their very existence. We stand in solidarity with them.”

Rodriguez firmly asserted that politicians should not be delving into or dictating the scope of care provided within medical examination rooms.

Additionally, another law has been enacted in Missouri this week, significantly restricting transgender student-athletes by mandating their participation on sports teams that align with the sex assigned to them at birth.

Missouri now joins the ranks of over 20 states that have implemented policies prohibiting gender-affirming care for minors. According to the Human Rights Campaign, at least seven more states are contemplating the introduction of similar laws or policies.

Pediatricians’ group reaffirms support for gender-affirming care amid growing state restrictions

This blog originally appeared at NBC News.

At least 21 states have enacted laws restricting or banning transition-related care for transgender minors, and most of those states face lawsuits.

A counter-protester wears a transgender flag as other rally in favor of a ban on gender-affirming health care on March 20 at the Missouri Statehouse in Jefferson City.

The American Academy of Pediatrics reaffirmed its support for gender-affirming medical care for transgender children on Thursday, even as the treatments face a growing push for bans and restrictions from Republican lawmakers across the U.S.

The board of directors for the group, which represents 67,000 pediatricians, unanimously voted to reaffirm its 2018 position on the treatments. The board also voted to provide additional documents to support pediatricians, including clinical and technical reports, and to conduct an external review of research regarding the care.

“The additional recommendations also reflect the fact that the board is concerned about restrictions to accessing evidence-based health care for young people who need it,” Mark Del Monte, the academy’s CEO, said in a statement released by the group, calling the restrictions enacted by states “unprecedented government intrusion.”

“We therefore need to provide the best and most transparent process possible,” he said.

At least 21 states have now enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, and most of those states face lawsuits. A federal judge struck down Arkansas’ ban as unconstitutional, and federal judges have temporarily blocked bans in Alabama and Indiana.

The judge who struck down Arkansas’ ban cited the position of the groups in his ruling against the ban. Arkansas has appealed the judge’s decision.

People opposed to such treatments for children argue they are too young to make such decisions about their futures.

Every major medical group, including the academy and the American Medical Association, has opposed the bans and has said the treatments are safe if administered properly.

The academy and the AMA support allowing children to seek the medical care, but they don’t offer age-specific guidance.

Why some people are choosing to move to states that protect gender-affirming health care

This blog originally appeared at CNN Health.

(KFF Health News)- Hal Dempsey wanted to “escape Missouri.” Arlo Dennis is “fleeing Florida.” The Tillison family “can’t stay in Texas.”

They are part of a new migration of Americans who are uprooting their lives in response to a raft of legislation across the country restricting health care for transgender people.

Missouri, Florida, and Texas are among at least 20 states that have limited components of gender-affirming health care for trans youth. Those three states are also among the states that prevent Medicaid — the public health insurance for people with low incomes — from paying for key aspects of such care for patients of all ages.

trans hormone replacement therapy STOCK RESTRICTED

Immediate access to gender-affirming hormone therapy eases distress, depression, suicidal thoughts for transgender adults, research finds

More than a quarter of trans adults surveyed by KFF and The Washington Post late last year said they had moved to a different neighborhood, city, or state to find more acceptance. Now, new restrictions on health care and the possibility of more in the future provide additional motivation.

Many are heading to places that are passing laws to support care for trans people, making those states appealing sanctuaries. California, for example, passed a law last fall to protect those receiving or providing gender-affirming care from prosecution. And now, California providers are getting more calls from people seeking to relocate there to prevent disruptions to their care, said Scott Nass, a family physician and expert on transgender care based in the state.

But the influx of patients presents a challenge, Nass said, “because the system that exists, it can’t handle all the refugees that potentially are out there.”

In Florida, the legislative targeting of trans people and their health care has persuaded Arlo Dennis, 35, that it is time to uproot their family of five from the Orlando area, where they’ve lived for more than a decade. They plan to move to Maryland.

Dennis, who uses they/them pronouns, no longer has access to hormone replacement therapy after Florida’s Medicaid program stopped covering transition-related care in late August under the claim that the treatments are experimental and lack evidence of being effective. Dennis said they ran out of their medication in January.

“It’s definitely led to my mental health having struggles and my physical health having struggles,” Dennis said.

click here to see full blog: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/23/health/families-moving-for-transgender-health-care/index.html

Not just Florida. More than a dozen states propose so-called ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bills – NPR

This blog originally appeared at NPR News.

Florida first. Alabama follows. Legislators in Louisiana and Ohio are currently debating legislation that is similar to the Florida statute. A similar bill will be his top priority during the following session, according to Texas Governor Greg Abbott.

At least a dozen states across the country are proposing new legislation that, in some ways, will resemble Florida’s recent contentious bill, which some opponents have dubbed “Don’t Say Gay.”

Read Full Article – https://www.npr.org/2022/04/10/1091543359/15-states-dont-say-gay-anti-transgender-bills


If you’re ready to look for a better state or county for you and your family (or family of choice), reach out to us at www.FleeRedStates.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑