New Jersey’s governor has recently signed a law prohibiting book bans to ensure that children can “read freely.”

This blog is originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

The Freedom to Read Act safeguards both books and the librarians who curate them.

On Monday, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy (D) signed the Freedom to Read Act into law, making it illegal for libraries and public schools to ban books.

“Across the nation, we have seen attempts to suppress and censor the stories and experiences of others,” Murphy said in a statement. “I’m proud to amplify the voices of our past and present, as there is no better way for our children to prepare for the future than to read freely.”

On social media, Murphy also emphasized that “reading freely is key to helping our children become lifelong learners.”

“Part of our responsibility as educators and education policymakers is to empower students by providing access to diverse ideas, knowledge, and perspectives,” said New Jersey Acting Education Commissioner Kevin Dehmer. “The Freedom to Read Act demonstrates our commitment to the educational excellence that defines our state. Through this legislation, we are protecting the integrity of our libraries, curated by dedicated professionals, and ensuring these resources are available to help every student grow as a critical thinker.”

Though the law will not take effect for a year, both the New Jersey state librarian and state education commissioner can begin implementing it as necessary. The law stipulates that libraries cannot ban books based on the origin, background, or views presented in the text or by its authors. Librarians are also prohibited from removing books they personally disagree with.

Additionally, school boards and library governing bodies are required to establish policies for curating and removing materials, as well as implementing systems for addressing book challenges.

The legislation also shields public library staff from criminal and civil liability for actions taken in good faith under the law, such as stocking “diverse and inclusive material” and providing residents access to all library materials.

New Jersey joins other states like Illinois, California, and Maryland, which have enacted similar measures in response to the rising trend of book banning. Last year, Illinois became the first state to pass such a bill, addressing the growing national concern over restricted access to books.

A recent report from the free-speech nonprofit PEN America revealed a significant surge in book bans during the 2023-2024 school year, with more than 10,000 books banned across the U.S. This is a sharp increase from the 3,362 books banned the previous year.

PEN America highlighted that banned books often include titles featuring romance, sexual experiences, rape or sexual abuse, as well as works with LGBTQ+ themes or those addressing race, racism, and characters of color.

Florida and Iowa have led the nation in book bans, recording over 8,000 instances between the two states. These bans are largely driven by stricter laws aimed at limiting access to certain books.

The organization also noted that these figures likely undercount the total number of book bans, as many go unreported. Schools have also implemented “soft” book bans, including policies that discourage students from checking out certain books, restricting who can access specific materials, canceling book fairs, and removing classroom collections.

Alabama House Advances Bill Potentially Allowing Prosecution of Librarians

This blog originally appeared at THE HILL.

Alabama Lawmakers Pass Bill Allowing Potential Prosecution of Librarians for Providing “Harmful” Materials to Minors

The Alabama House of Representatives approved the bill with a 72-28 vote, sending it to the state Senate for consideration. The legislation removes current exemptions for public libraries under the state’s obscenity law and is part of a broader national movement aimed at banning certain books.

The bill also broadens the definition of prohibited sexual conduct in public K-12 schools and libraries to include any “sexual or gender-oriented conduct” that could expose minors to individuals dressed in “sexually revealing, exaggerated, or provocative clothing or costumes,” or involved in stripping, lewd dancing, or similar activities.

If enacted, librarians who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.

Anyone who believes that public schools or libraries are violating the law can submit a written notice of the violation to the organization’s leaders and the local district attorney.

Critics argue that the bill enables individuals who disagree with a librarian’s content choices to threaten criminal prosecution arbitrarily, according to The Associated Press.

During the debate, State Rep. Chris England, a Democrat from Tuscaloosa, warned that the process could be manipulated to arrest librarians without legitimate cause, merely because of personal disagreements. State Rep. Neil Rafferty, a Democrat from Birmingham, expressed concerns that the bill would be easily abused and violate the First Amendment. Meanwhile, Republican state Rep. David Faulkner downplayed the severity, stating that “it’s only a misdemeanor” and that librarians would only face consequences if they failed to address the content after being made aware of it.

If the state Senate passes the bill and Gov. Kay Ivey (R) signs it, the law would take effect on October 1.

This legislation is part of a broader nationwide push to restrict access to books and materials depicting LGBTQ+ communities. The bill’s sponsor, Republican state Rep. Arnold Mooney, emphasized during the debate that the primary goal is to protect children.

“This is not about party lines; it’s about protecting children,” Mooney stated, according to the Associated Press.

Read more.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑