Unfilled prescriptions, missed checkups, and loneliness: States’ anti-LGBTQ+ policies impact health | ADVOCATE

This blog originally appeared at ADVOCATE.

Most of the extreme bills have failed to pass, but trans adults are closely monitoring statehouses with heightened anxiety.

This year, states have attempted to restrict transgender people from using public bathrooms and updating identity documents like driver’s licenses. Legislators in multiple states are working to redefine sex based on reproductive capacity and to exclude gender identity from discrimination protections.

So far, these bills aiming to weaken civil rights protections for trans people and bar them from public facilities haven’t made significant progress. According to the ACLU, only five anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been enacted into law this year. Additionally, several states notorious for advancing such legislation, like Florida, Utah, and West Virginia, have concluded their legislative sessions for the year.

Nonetheless, these efforts could have disastrous impacts on the lives of trans adults. Medical health professionals are concerned about the long-term physical and mental health effects of ongoing political attempts to restrict LGBTQ+ rights. Additionally, many of the active bills could create gaps in medical care for trans people during this period of heightened anxiety.

Currently, Ashton Colby is experiencing a state of chronic stress. As a 31-year-old white transgender man living near Columbus, Ohio, he has felt intense whiplash due to the unexpected changes in state policies on gender-affirming care over the past few months.

“With my fundamental, basic humanity being publicly debated and scrutinized, I feel gutted, dehumanized, and completely misunderstood for all that I am,” he said.

Colby has been stressed for years about anti-trans policies, but he never imagined that trans adults might be forced to go without medical care. In Ohio, that nearly happened. Republican Governor Mike DeWine proposed restricting gender-affirming care for adults instead of supporting a statewide ban on minors’ care. However, after public outcry, the state’s health agency announced it would not implement those restrictions for adults.

Colby initially feared he would lose his medical provider of eight years and considered moving to Denver. He also worries that if Republicans win the White House and Congress this year, his ability to access necessary documentation and his rights as a trans person will be at risk.

Dr. Carl Streed, president of the U.S. Professional Association for Transgender Health (USPATH), constantly contemplates the negative health outcomes for trans people who do not feel safe in society. He believes anti-trans policies will exacerbate isolation during what the surgeon general has called an epidemic of isolation and loneliness in the United States.

“These policies that restrict people’s public life are effectively directly harming them, both in terms of immediate issues around mental health, connection to community, accessing care in urgent situations, but long-term, we’re going to see worse health outcomes in probably the next five, ten years, if not sooner,” he said.

What do those worse health outcomes look like? Increased isolation and inability to participate in public life and engage in-person with the community lead to poorer cardiovascular fitness and a higher likelihood of high cholesterol and hypertension. This, in turn, increases the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Isolation is also associated with worse cognitive function and decreased memory, according to Streed.

“They’re definitely creating a complex patchwork of restricted public spaces,” remarked Streed, a primary care physician at the Boston Medical Center. “But the concern is that these are national discussions. What unfolds in Florida becomes a topic I discuss with my patients in the examination room.”

Transgender individuals in states without healthcare or public space restrictions may still feel anxious about such policies in other states, he noted. These restrictions can impact them even when visiting friends and family.

As of this year, the ACLU is monitoring around 200 active anti-LGBTQ+ bills in various state legislatures. While some bills have been defeated, the transgender community, along with much of the broader LGBTQ+ community, continues to experience heightened fear and anxiety.

Simone Chriss, an attorney with the Southern Legal Counsel in Florida and director of the organization’s transgender rights initiative, highlighted during a press call in February that Florida has implemented a series of often perplexing anti-LGBTQ+ policies designed to instill fear.

“The intention is to instill fear and confusion, making us uncertain about our rights, leading us to err on the side of caution. The vagueness and ambiguity are deliberate,” she asserted. Chriss addressed a gathering of advocates, locals, and members of the press at an emergency “town hall” aimed at clarifying the legal implications and debunking myths surrounding Florida’s new driver’s license policy.

Angelique Godwin, an Afro-Latina transgender woman and advocate with Equality Florida, shared with The 19th how transgender individuals in Florida have been rallying around each other amid increasing limitations on their everyday lives. Last spring, Godwin faced a setback in her healthcare access when Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law barring patients from receiving gender-affirming care from nurse practitioners. Subsequently, she encountered difficulty refilling her prescription for estradiol valerate, an essential component of her gender-affirming care. This confusion stemmed from pharmacies refusing service to patients in the aftermath of the law’s enactment, a challenge also faced by other transgender individuals in Florida.

“Fortunately, I had a stash, my own little reserve of medications. But for people close to me who were affected, they had no access,” she explained. “It came out of nowhere for them.”

Later, Godwin discovered a facility in Tampa with a doctor who operated on a sliding-scale payment system, enabling her to continue her care. She also obtained coverage through the federal government’s health insurance marketplace, which provided further assistance. Additionally, she managed to maintain appointments with her regular doctor for mental health visits despite the new law.

Additional gaps in care have been filled by mutual aid grants and organizations like Folx Health, an LGBTQ+ telehealth provider. Folx mandates an in-person doctor’s visit, during which patients review and sign a consent form to ensure care aligns with state regulations.

“During those initial three months from June to August, many people faced challenges. However, since then, most of the individuals I’m acquainted with who are in Florida have remained.”

About 30 bills aiming to limit transgender individuals’ access to healthcare are currently progressing through state legislatures, according to the ACLU. These bills seek to prohibit gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, for transgender youth. Additionally, they aim to block insurance or Medicaid coverage for such care and impose restrictions on access to these services for incarcerated transgender individuals.

Accessing gender-affirming care is already challenging for transgender individuals in many parts of the country, even without additional state-level restrictions. For numerous trans individuals, obtaining essential healthcare necessitates traveling across state borders.

Dr. Angela Rodriguez, a plastic surgeon specializing in transgender care in San Francisco, frequently treats patients who journey to California. This isn’t solely due to a lack of trans-affirming care elsewhere; she’s had transgender individuals travel from places like Alabama, where finding quality dental or primary care is challenging.

Over the past few years, she has heard a recurring concern from patients from out of state: Who will provide ongoing care for them in the future?

“I have patients who choose to return, flying all the way from the East Coast, because they don’t feel comfortable discussing their needs with a local physician,” she noted. She collaborates with patients traveling from other states to ensure they have a support network in California to assist them post-surgery, whether it’s a loved one or a friend.

Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, the president-elect of USPATH and a practitioner at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, highlighted the deteriorating mental health of her adolescent and young adult trans patients due to the recent bans on gender-affirming care for minors in certain states. Additionally, her patients express concerns about their safety and ability to exist publicly, especially regarding the use of public restrooms. With extreme bathroom bans in states like Florida and Utah, coupled with eight other states prohibiting trans individuals from using restrooms aligning with their gender identity in school settings, the fears among trans youth are compounded.

“I don’t think people fully grasp the mental health toll of the pandemic, let alone the added weight of these laws,” she remarked. Olson-Kennedy emphasized that many of her patients, who are mostly preparing for college or graduate school, are opting to avoid states implementing anti-trans legislation when considering their educational pursuits.

Olson-Kennedy herself finds social media to be an unsafe space. As a provider of gender-affirming care, she faces hostility and politicization from Republican lawmakers, lobbyists, and far-right media figures.

“You should be shot when you leave your clinic because you can only handle so much hearing.” That’s not something that medical school curriculums teach. Pediatricians and children’s hospitals have never dealt with anything like this before.

Olson-Kennedy stated that more individuals should be aware of what gender-affirming care entails. She explained that the care is given over an extended period of time, with parents and guardians participating for kids, and it addresses the extreme hopelessness that many trans persons experience as a result of gender dysphoria.

“I wish people could see above their personal discomfort and ignorance and truly acknowledge the medical necessity of this therapy. It saves and transforms people’s lives, and it’s incredibly significant,” she remarked.

Florida colleges are closing LGBTQ+ centers due to DeSantis’ “Anti-Woke” campaign.

This blog originally appeared at THEM.

Governor Ron DeSantis signed a law last year prohibiting Florida College System schools from sustaining DEI programs such as LGBTQ+ centers.


This week, the University of North Florida (UNF) closed three offices focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in compliance with a law enacted last year that bars state funding for such initiatives.

As reported by WTLV, the Intercultural Center, Interfaith Center, LGBTQ Center, Women’s Center, and Office of Diversity and Inclusion at UNF have been closed this week. Additionally, the Victim Advocacy Program, responsible for addressing sexual misconduct on campus, has been transferred to the office of the Dean of Students, according to UNF Media Relations Manager Amanda Ennis.

Since last year, the University of North Florida (UNF) has been gradually closing all five offices, including the LGBTQ+ center, following the enactment of Senate Bill 266 by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. This bill prohibits Florida College System schools from maintaining Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs like LGBTQ+ centers. Additionally, state-funded schools are barred from engaging in political or social activism and offering courses based on theories of systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege. The legislation, authored by state Sen. Erin Grall, who previously served in the state House of Representatives, has been part of a series of DeSantis-approved bills, including various abortion restrictions and the anti-trans “Safety in Private Spaces Act.”

In January, the Florida Board of Governors, responsible for overseeing the state university system, announced plans to gradually eliminate these programs, prompting protests on campuses. Carlos Guillermo Smith, a policy director at Equality Florida, a LGBTQ+ advocacy group, condemned the Board for complying with Governor DeSantis’ directives. Smith expressed disappointment, stating, “The Board of Governors had the opportunity to hit the brakes, but instead, shamefully followed their censorship agenda off a cliff in service to DeSantis’s failed political ambitions,” in an interview with NBC.

According to Ennis’s statement to WTLV, employees who previously worked at the now-closed offices “have transitioned to other available positions within the university.” Prior to the closure of the programs, several staff members chose to depart from the university. Some of them joined OneJax Inc., an interfaith diversity nonprofit that separated from its affiliation with UNF in July last year.

“I realized I needed to find another avenue for this important work, or it would simply cease to exist,” explained Matt Hartley, who previously served as the director of UNF’s Interfaith Center and now holds the position of director of interfaith programs at OneJax. This statement was made in an interview with the Florida Times-Union back in November.

With a history of opposing LGBTQ+ rights, DeSantis has directed his political agenda towards DEI programs as a central component of his ongoing “anti-woke” campaign in Florida. In early 2023, he effectively gained control of the board of New College, a progressive liberal arts institution, and in August of the same year, he eliminated the university’s gender studies program through a motion proposed by board member Christopher Rufo, known for his involvement in the anti-LGBTQ+ “groomer” panic. DeSantis’ actions have sparked frequent protests from students, some of whom have alleged experiencing police brutality during demonstrations.

Over the past few years, anti-DEI policies have become increasingly common, particularly in conservative strongholds. In March, Alabama enacted a law prohibiting DEI programs and courses, labeling them as “divisive concepts.” Additionally, the law mandated strict segregation of multi-stall restrooms based on sex assigned at birth. In another instance, Republicans in March attempted to defund DEI programs through multiple amendments to the omnibus spending package. However, these efforts were thwarted, and the final budget did not include such provisions.


Bomb Threat Interrupts Drag Story Hour Event at Arlington Gay Bar

This blog originally appeared at BLADE.

The event at Freddie’s Beach Bar resumed following a thorough search by police and a bomb-sniffing dog. After ensuring the safety of the premises, the event continued without further interruption.

During a Drag Story Hour event at Freddie’s Beach Bar, a popular gay bar and restaurant in Arlington, Virginia, attendees were unexpectedly evacuated due to a bomb threat received via email on April 6. Parents and children participating in the event were ushered into the rear outdoor seating area and parking lot while law enforcement, including a bomb-sniffing dog, conducted a thorough search of the premises. Fortunately, no explosives were found.

Freddie Lutz, the owner of Freddie’s Beach Bar situated in Crystal City, South Arlington, disclosed that the threatening email arrived during the inaugural Drag Story Hour event. This event, where drag performers read children’s stories to accompanied families, had drawn a sizable crowd of neighborhood residents, including kids, babies, and even a grandmother. Despite the disruption, attendees patiently waited until authorities gave the all-clear signal before returning inside.

During the Drag Story Hour event at Freddie’s Beach Bar, two protesters made their presence known outside the venue. Freddie Lutz revealed that prior to the event, drag performer Tara Hoot had warned him about potential disruptions, as some of her previous Drag Story Hour events had faced bomb threats and protests.

“We were somewhat prepared, mentally at least,” Lutz commented. “As anticipated, we received an unsettling email threatening both the bar and me personally at my residence, although thankfully nothing was found there,” he added, referring to his nearby South Arlington home.

Arlington police responded to the bomb threat report, conducting a thorough search of the premises and finding no evidence of criminal activity. The investigation remains ongoing.

Tara Hoot, who has been organizing Drag Story Hour events in the D.C. area for over a year, revealed that several of her past events have encountered hostile protests or bomb threats, with no actual explosives ever discovered. At the Freddie’s event, two protesters, a man and a woman, invoked religious reasons for opposing the Drag Story Hour, spreading messages of intolerance and attempting to shame parents for attending with their children.

Despite such opposition, Hoot’s performances cater to children’s interests with songs, readings from books like “The Very Hungry Caterpillar,” which promotes positive themes like bravery, and engaging activities like blowing bubbles and using rainbow ribbons. She describes the atmosphere as one of fun, love, and joy.

Originating in San Francisco in 2015 under the auspices of an organization named Drag Story Hour, these events have spread nationwide, occurring in various settings including libraries, bookstores, restaurants, and bars. The organization aims to create spaces where children can witness individuals defying conventional gender norms, fostering a vision of a world where everyone can express their true selves freely.

Transgender Candidate Seeks to Replace the Cosponsor of a Stringent Anti-Drag Bill

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

“If you choose to target our communities, be prepared to face competition from within our community.”


A transgender woman is seeking to replace an Ohio legislator who endorsed the state’s anti-drag bill. If successful, she would also become the first openly transgender individual to hold a position in the state’s House of Representatives.

Arienne Childrey is presently the sole candidate in the unopposed March 19 Democratic primary election for the representation of Ohio’s District 84. The 40-year-old shared with the local Cincinnati outlet CityBeat that her decision to run was driven by the intention to challenge state Rep. Angela King (R).


During the previous summer, King and her fellow Republican state Rep. Josh Williams presented House Bill 245. This bill aimed to alter the legal definition of “adult cabaret performances” in the state, encompassing “performers or entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performer’s or entertainer’s gender assigned at birth using clothing, makeup, prosthetic or imitation genitals or breasts, or other physical markers.”


The introduced legislation is among numerous bills in state legislatures nationwide that seek to prohibit drag performances in the presence of children. During testimony last month, King referenced a video of a drag performance that occurred in her community.


While King asserted that under HB 245, transgender individuals would still have the freedom to “express their gender as they go to a grocery store, the post office, and live their daily lives,” critics argue that the bill would disproportionately impact the transgender community. In a statement during the summer, Densil Porteus, the executive director of Stonewall Columbus, mentioned that the proposed law “aims to give power to others as to when they believe gender impersonation/drag is being performed.”


As highlighted by writer Joy Ellison in an August editorial for Matter, the current version of the bill explicitly states that transgender entertainers would face a prohibition on performing in locations other than adult venues in Ohio.


Childrey, a resident of Ohio since 2014 and the founder of Northwest Ohio Trans Advocacy, expressed to CityBeat that she couldn’t passively observe King running unopposed in the imminent November election.

“If you’re going to target our communities, then you’ll need to contend with someone from within our community,” she asserted.

“It’s long overdue for us to have someone at the Statehouse genuinely dedicated to addressing those issues—matters that truly affect people and can enhance our lives—rather than someone more focused on causing harm rather than providing assistance,” she added.

Childrey stands against Ohio’s recently enacted prohibition on gender-affirming care. Additionally, her campaign emphasizes education-related matters such as boosting teacher salaries, expanding broadband access in rural areas, and fortifying unions throughout the state.


“Arienne’s dedication to public service and her ability to persevere in the face of challenges set a compelling example for everyone,” stated the transgender advocacy organization TransOhio. “As she confronts the hurdles that come with this groundbreaking journey, we also want to recognize the importance of her candidacy and the influence it will have in paving the way for future generations of trans leaders.”


“The only thing that could bring me more joy than being the first trans woman elected in the state of Ohio,” Childrey expressed, “is to not be the only trans person elected in the state of Ohio.”

About 300 individuals participated in a “guerrilla drag show” as a form of protest against an anti-transgender event.

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

“I dislike the necessity of being present to demonstrate our existence…yet, I also appreciate witnessing so many individuals standing up for this community,” expressed one of the performers.


Approximately 300 individuals attended a “guerrilla drag show” held this week outside an event featuring anti-transgender speakers. The anti-trans event, organized by the conservative student group Turning Point USA, occurred on Cal Poly’s campus in San Luis Obispo, California. It included speeches by de-transition advocate Chloe Cole and Canadian anti-LGBTQ+ activist Chris Elston.

Cole and Elston are currently part of a speaking tour titled “A Dad & A Detransitioner’s Take on the Transgender Movement.” Promoted by Turning Point on Instagram, the event claimed that the speakers would “explain what the transgender movement really is, the truth about it, and the myths that surround it!”

Chloe Cole, a detransitioner with right-wing views, has emerged as a strong advocate for anti-trans laws and policies. Chris Elston, known for wearing sandwich-board signs with anti-trans slogans, gained attention in 2020 and 2021 by displaying a billboard and wearing a sign that declared “I (heart) J.K. Rowling.” He also engaged in confrontations with women whom he perceived as overly supportive of trans rights.

To counter the anti-trans event hosted by Turning Point USA, the Cal Poly Drag Club organized a drag show outside the venue.

“The Drag Club stands as a beacon for the queer community and our allies. We’re appalled by Turning Point USA’s anti-trans agenda on our campus. In protest, we’re hosting a guerrilla drag show to embrace the love and queer joy present here…”

“Unlike the 300 attendees at the drag show, only 100 were present inside to hear the anti-trans speakers, as reported by San Luis Obispo’s The Tribune.”

“Video footage of the drag show captures hundreds of students cheering and dancing joyfully as they witness the performances.”


“I dislike having to be present to affirm our existence and demonstrate our pride, success, and resilience as trans individuals. However, I appreciate the overwhelming support shown by so many people for our community,” expressed Vinny Torres, drag club vice president and performer known as Skinny Mocha. “It’s a mix of emotions, but the solidarity is heartening.”


A university spokesperson responded to upset students who accused the school of insufficient action against Turning Point’s event, asserting the institution’s position.

“We acknowledge the concerns about specific guest speakers at Cal Poly,” stated spokesperson Matt Lazier. “However, it is not the university’s responsibility to determine who can or cannot share their perspectives on campus.”

Texas law that restricted drag shows declared unconstitutional – ABC News

This blog originally appeared at ABC News.

It is the second law of its kind to be declared unconstitutional.

A federal judge has issued a permanent injunction against a Texas bill that restricted “sexually oriented performances” and has been criticized for limiting public drag performances in the state.

U.S. District Judge David Hittner said the law is an “unconstitutional restriction on speech” and “violates the First Amendment as incorporated to Texas by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

A similar law in Tennessee, the first state to restrict drag performances in public, was also blocked and ruled unconstitutional.

The law was set to go into effect on Friday, Sept. 1, but a preliminary injunction halted its enforcement.

“LGBTQIA+ Texans, venue owners, performers, and our allies all came together to uphold free expression in our state — and we won,” the ACLU of Texas said in a social media post. “This work isn’t done but for now we celebrate. Long live Texas drag!”

A Drag Queen performs during a show at the Swan Dive nightclub on March 20, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

The Texas law doesn’t specifically mention drag shows, but Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said the bill would prohibit “sexualized performances and drag shows in the presence of a minor.”

The ACLU of Texas represented local LGBTQ groups, businesses and a performer in a lawsuit against state officials.

The “exhibition or representation, actual or simulated, of male or female genitals in a lewd state” as well as “the exhibition of sexual gesticulations using accessories or prosthetics that exaggerate male or female sexual characteristics” would have been restricted under the law.

Members of the Drag Show community listen in during a meeting at the Texas State Capitol on March 23, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

Performances would be restricted from public properties or in the presence of someone under the age of 18.

Under the law, businesses would have faced a $10,000 fine for hosting such a performance. Performers could be charged with a Class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of $4,000.

Critics of the bill said traveling Broadway plays, theater performances, professional cheerleading routines and drag shows would have been impacted.

Trump-appointed judge won’t force Texas university to allow drag show

This blog originally appeared at Reuters.

Sept 22 (Reuters) – A LGBTQ student group did not have an inherent constitutional right to hold a charity drag show on West Texas A&M University’s campus over the objections of the school’s president, who deemed such performances “misogynistic” and mocking of womanhood, a federal judge ruled.

Sept 22 (Reuters) – A LGBTQ student group did not have an inherent constitutional right to hold a charity drag show on West Texas A&M University’s campus over the objections of the school’s president, who deemed such performances “misogynistic” and mocking of womanhood, a federal judge ruled.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, who before becoming a judge in Amarillo, Texas, was a Christian legal activist opposed to LGBTQ rights causes, on Thursday ruled that it was far from clear that drag shows were covered by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment’s protections for free expression.

The LGBTQ student group, Spectrum WT, sued in March after the school’s president, Walter Wendler, barred a charity drag show set for that month from going forward even though, he said, “the law of the land appears to require it.”

The group later moved that event off campus, but it continued to seek an injunction barring him from banning future events including a planned drag show in March 2024.

But Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former Republican President Donald Trump, said Wendler was wrong that the law required him to allow drag shows, which can involve “sexualized conduct” that can be regulated to protect any children in an audience from “lewdness.”

The LGBTQ student group, Spectrum WT, sued in March after the school’s president, Walter Wendler, barred a charity drag show set for that month from going forward even though, he said, “the law of the land appears to require it.”

The group later moved that event off campus, but it continued to seek an injunction barring him from banning future events including a planned drag show in March 2024.

But Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former Republican President Donald Trump, said Wendler was wrong that the law required him to allow drag shows, which can involve “sexualized conduct” that can be regulated to protect any children in an audience from “lewdness.”

Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office, which defended the university, did not respond to a request for comment.

Kacsmaryk gained national attention in April when he suspended approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. An appellate court overturned parts of that ruling, and the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed the pill to remain on the market while appeals proceed.

His ruling on Thursday conflicted with recent decisions by judges in Utah, Tennessee, Montana and Texas blocking state and municipal laws banning drag shows.

Kacsmaryk in reaching his conclusion cited “older rules” of First Amendment case law that recognized an “outer limit” for expressive conduct.

He said those remain valid even under modern free speech jurisprudence, which “only intermittently” examines what is protected historically, in contrast to how the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is interpreted.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court last year ruled that gun laws must be “consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation” to pass muster under the Second Amendment.

The case is Spectrum WT v. Wendler, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, No. 2:23-cv-00048.

For Spectrum WT: J.T. Morris of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression

For the West Texas A&M University defendants: Charles Eldred of the Office of the Texas Attorney General

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑