Two of Wisconsin’s largest pediatric hospitals have stopped providing gender-affirming care for transgender youth, Wisconsin Public Radio reports.
Children’s Wisconsin and University of Wisconsin (UW) Health have ended the treatment for minors, after pressure from the Trump administration. Advocates say the end of gender-affirming medical care will lead to negative mental health effects for trans youth.
In a statement, Children’s Wisconsin cited “escalating legal and federal regulatory risk” facing providers across the nation as the reason it is “currently unable to provide gender-affirming pharmacologic care.” The hospital added that LGBTQ+ children should be treated with “support, respect, dignity, and compassion.”
The hospital will continue to offer mental health services for patients and families.
In December, the Department of Health and Human Services, under the direction of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced plans to end all Medicaid and Medicare funding for hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to minors.
“Under my leadership, and answering President Trump’s call to action, the federal government will do everything in its power to stop unsafe, irreversible practices that put our children at risk,” Kennedy said, announcing the funding threat. “This administration will protect America’s most vulnerable. Our children deserve better — and we are delivering on that promise.”
In reality, gender-affirming medications for young people are considered by every major American medical association to be safe, reversible, and essential to the well-being of trans youth.
UW Health said its hospital system will pause prescribing puberty blockers and hormone therapy for patients under 18 years old “due to recent federal actions.” The hospital remains committed to providing “high-quality, compassionate” care to LGBTQ+ patients, officials said in a statement.
“We recognize the uncertainty faced by our impacted patients and families seeking this gender-affirming care and will continue to support their health and well-being,” they said.
Steve Starkey, executive director for OutReach LGBTQ+ Community Center in Madison, said the consequences of ending the care will be grave.
“It will definitely have a negative impact on the rates of suicide, and the mental health of the trans community” in general, he said. “It affects trans adults as well, because it’s like an attack on all trans people.”
Starkey pointed to rates of suicide and suicidal ideation, which are already high for the trans community.
A 2023 study by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law found that more than 80% of trans adults had suicidal thoughts, while more than 40% had attempted suicide.
“For trans people of all ages, being able to express themselves in the gender that they feel that they are is important for their mental and physical health,” Starkey said. “By not allowing trans people to do that, to have the support, it just means that they are not able to be wholly who they are.”
In the last week alone, hospitals and clinics in Orange County, Riverside, and San Diego, California — and in Tacoma, Washington too — announced plans to shutter gender-affirming care programs for trans youth.
A year ago this week, Trump issued an executive order vowing to end what he called the “chemical and surgical mutilation” of children with gender-affirming care. Republicans have used these terms to outrage people and vilify medical providers of the care, but puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapies don’t “mutilate” kids, and gender-affirming surgeries are rarely (if ever) conducted on minors.
A protester at Children’s Hospital of Orange County this week described the same care as life-saving.
“I’m a transgender woman, and I’m here to tell you that denying people this gender-affirming care doesn’t make gender dysphoria go away,” Stephanie Wade, chair of Lavender Democrats of Orange County, told LAist. “All it does is make it metastasize into suicidal depression. And I’ve been there. I dealt with this as a child. We can’t take this away from kids.”
If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call or text 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org. The Trans Lifeline (1-877-565-8860) is staffed by trans people and will not contact law enforcement. The Trevor Project provides a safe, judgement-free place to talk for youth via chat, text (678-678), or phone (1-866-488-7386). Help is available at all three resources in English and Spanish.
Hola, future LGBTQ+ immigrant! When I first considered moving to Mexico, I was excited but also nervous about the unknowns. Having made the leap, I’ve discovered a country full of beauty, surprises, and opportunities for personal growth. Whether you’re seeking adventure, a lower cost of living, or a fresh start, Mexico has something for everyone. However, a smooth transition requires careful planning.
In this guide, I’ll share the lessons I’ve learned—from finding a home to navigating daily life—so you can start your journey with confidence.
VISA PROCESS – HOW TO LEGALLY LIVE IN MEXICO
To live in Mexico long-term, expats typically need a residency visa. There are many people who travel back and forth from the USA and leverage the “180 days” when entering Mexico. The downside to this approach is that it is up to the officer stamping passports at the airport and you can easily get less than 180 days.
Temporary Resident Visa
Ideal for those looking to stay in Mexico for up to four years, this visa requires proof of financial solvency.
Permanent Resident Visa
This visa is for individuals who plan to stay in Mexico indefinitely and provides nearly the same rights as Mexican citizens, except for voting.
Work Visa
If you plan to work for a Mexican employer, you’ll need a work visa, which typically requires a job offer from a Mexican company. Many LGBTQ+ expats work remotely for employers abroad, which can be done under temporary or permanent residency.
Financial Requirements (estimates for 2026)
Residency visas require proof of income and/or savings. Requirements vary and can change due to exchange rates, so it’s best to check with the Mexican consulate you will apply. Below are the estimates for 2026. These vary by consulate and currency fluctuations impact them. So take these as directional.
Temporary Residency: Approximately $74,500 – $87,599 USD/$98,000 – $112,500 CDN in Savings (monthly ending balance for the last 12 months) or $4,500-$5,250 USD/$5,800-$6,750 CDN a month in retirement or income
Permanent Residency: Approximately $280,000- $350,000 USD/$350,000-$450,000 CDN in Savings (monthly ending balance for the last 12 month) or $7,200-$8,750 USD/$9,800 – $11,250 CDN a month in retirement income (there may be some consulates that consider regular income instead of retirement)
Application Process
Residency applications usually start at a Mexican consulate in the USA (or Canada). Prepare documents like financial statements, identification, and passport. The requirements vary by consulate as well as ease of setting up appointments for the process. I utilized the Orlando consulate (while I was still living in San Francisco), the process was very smooth and easy.
Enter Mexico and Complete the Process
With your visa in hand, it’s time to head to Mexico. But don’t get too comfortable yet—you’ll need to complete a few more steps to secure your residency card.
Enter Mexico Within 180 Days: Once your visa is issued, you have 180 days to enter Mexico. After arrival, you’ll have 30 days to start the residency card application process.
Visit the INM Office (Instituto Nacional de Migración): Head to the local immigration office (INM) in the city you plan to live. Here, you’ll submit additional documents, including your visa, passport, and application form.
Complete Biometrics and Finalize Application: At the INM office, they’ll take your fingerprints and photograph again. Once everything’s approved, they’ll issue your residency card, which you’ll need to pick up in person.
Renewal or Transition to Permanent Residency (for Temporary Residents)
If you start with a temporary residency, remember that it needs annual renewals. After your first year of temporary residency, you can renew for 1 year or up to 3 years. After four years of temporary residency, you can transition to permanent residency if you wish. The transition process is generally straightforward, requiring less documentation than your initial application.
COST OF LIVING
When I arrived in Mexico, I was amazed at how far my money stretched. Life here can be incredibly affordable, but it all depends on your lifestyle and location. Whether you’re looking for luxury or a budget-friendly existence, there’s a place for you. My overall living expenses in Mexico are roughly 55% less than in the U.S.
Typical Expenses
Moving Belongings: Moving personal items to Mexico can be costly, ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 USD. I opted to downsize significantly and made multiple trips by car, which saved me money and simplified the process. Downsizing also felt freeing—less clutter, more peace of mind! Plus all the things you need for a home is available in Mexico.
Housing: My one-bedroom apartment in Guadalajara costs $1,200 USD/month, which is nearer the top end of prices but I was looking in a specific neighborhood with the desired amenities. By contrast, luxury rentals in popular beach towns like Puerto Vallarta can range from $1,500 to $2,500 USD/month. Renting in less touristy areas, such as Querétaro or Mérida, can save you even more.
Utilities: Most of the year, my power bills rarely exceed $40 USD/month. A couple of months a year it warms up in Guadalajara and I run the a/c quite often which will double the power bill. In warmer regions, air conditioning can significantly increase costs. Paying bills at OXXO or other convenience stores is the norm here.
Internet and Phone: I use TotalPlay for fast and reliable internet at $35 USD/month, ideal for remote work. For phone service, AT&T’s unlimited plan ($85 USD monthly) covers the U.S., Latin America, and Canada, while I prepaid for a year of AT&T Mexico service for seamless local communication ($120 USD annually).
Groceries: Shopping at local mercados has been a game-changer. Fresh produce is affordable and flavorful, and I’ve discovered fruits like mamey and guanabana that I’d never tried before. Local restaurants offer some of the best, most authentic food at great prices.
Pro Tip: Dining at small, locally-owned restaurants not only saves money but also supports the community and gives you a taste of authentic Mexican cuisine. I love my local Mercados, so many food vendors where you can get three tacos and a drink for less than $10USD.
Water: In most areas of Mexico, it is advised to not drink the water. There are many water companies that will deliver garrafones (20 liters or approximately 5 gallons). I use 4 garrafones a month which runs $250pesos or $15 USD.
CHOOSING THE RIGHT LOCATION
Finding the perfect place to live in Mexico was one of the most exciting parts of my journey. Each city has its own personality, so take your time exploring.
Popular Cities and Regions
Mexico City: This bustling metropolis offers world-class museums, vibrant nightlife, and incredible food. Perfect for those who love big-city energy, though traffic and the fast pace can feel overwhelming. The main gayborhoods in the city are Zona Rosa, Condesa and Roma but close by neighborhoods are super gay-friendly such as Navarte & Napoles.
Guadalajara: My chosen home. It’s a perfect mix of modern amenities, historic charm, moderate weather and a thriving gay scene. Affordable and vibrant, it’s an excellent base for expats. The main gayborhoods are Colonia Americana and Centro Historico.
Puerto Vallarta: Known for its stunning beaches and welcoming gay community, this coastal town feels like a constant vacation. However, it’s more touristy and pricier than inland cities. Gay life centers around Zona Romantica but the city is super gay-friendly where ever you go. Check out the up & coming neighborhood or Versalles.
Tulum/Playa del Carmen: Ideal for eco-conscious and wellness-focused expats, with a laid-back vibe and breathtaking turquoise waters.
Other Options: Consider Mérida for its colonial charm and safety, Oaxaca for its cultural richness, or Querétaro for its modern amenities and family-friendly atmosphere.
My Tip: Rent before you buy! I spent my first few months exploring neighborhoods and getting a feel for different cities before settling down.
HEALTHCARE
Healthcare was a major concern for me before moving, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the quality and affordability here.
Key Points
Private Healthcare: A consultation at a private clinic cost me just $40 USD. The facilities were modern, clean, and the staff were friendly and bilingual.
Public Healthcare (IMSS): I am currently in the process of applying for IMSS and will provide an update on the steps and outcome.
Insurance: Combining private health insurance with IMSS provides excellent coverage for emergencies and routine care. Note that insurers in Mexico can deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.
For Prep & testing for Sexual Transmitted Infections: Most major cities have organizations that do testing & offer Prep for a very low price ($20 USD). The costs for non residents are more expensive but affordable. I utilize Checcos in Guadalajara which provides a fantastic service for the community.
Pro Tip: Major cities like Guadalajara and Mexico City have top-tier hospitals equipped with cutting-edge technology.
TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS
Getting around in Mexico is a diverse experience, offering everything from efficient public transportation to affordable ride-hailing services. Whether you’re commuting within a city, traveling between regions, or exploring off-the-beaten-path destinations, understanding your transportation options can make your transition smoother.
Public Transportation
Bike Share: My go-to transportation choice in Guadalajara is the MiBiCi bike share program. My annual membership is around $22. There are no additional charges if you keep each trip less than 30 minutes. Most major cities in Mexico have bike share programs, one of the biggest in Latin America is Ecobici in Mexico City.
Pro Tip: Auto drivers have the right of way in Mexico, so be cautious when biking.
City Buses: City buses are a popular and inexpensive way to get around urban areas. In cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey, buses are frequent, but routes can be tricky for newcomers to navigate. Fares range from $0.30 to $0.60 USD per ride.
Pro Tip: Ask locals or consult Google Maps to understand routes. Always carry small change for bus fares.
Metro Systems: Mexico City has a world-class metro system with extensive coverage and fares as low as $0.25 USD per ride. Other cities, like Monterrey and Guadalajara, also have metro or light rail systems that are affordable and reliable.
Collectivos (Shared Vans): Shared vans, known as collectivos, are a popular option in smaller cities and rural areas. They run fixed routes and are cheaper than taxis. Look for signs on the windshield indicating their destination.
Ride-Hailing Apps:
Ride-hailing apps like Uber and Didi are widely available in major cities and tourist areas, offering affordable, safe, and convenient rides. Prices are generally lower than traditional taxis, and the apps allow you to track your ride and driver.
Pro Tip: Use Uber or Didi for late-night travel or when navigating unfamiliar areas.
Taxis:
Street Taxis: While taxis are plentiful, they often lack meters, so fares should be negotiated upfront. They are more common in smaller towns but are gradually being replaced by ride-hailing apps in cities.
Authorized Taxis at Airports: At airports, only authorized taxis are allowed to pick up passengers. These are generally safe but more expensive than ride-hailing apps. Look for the official taxi stands inside the airport terminal.
Rental Cars:
All the major US rental car brands have a presence in Mexico. If I am heading out of town to a nearby location, I do often opt for a rental car. Mexican law requires a valid drivers license from the US or Canada. When renting a car, you are also required to get the liability insurance for potential accidents.
LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION
Learning Spanish in Mexico
Learning Spanish transforms your experience in Mexico, enhancing daily life, cultural immersion, and personal connections. While many Mexicans in tourist areas speak some English, knowing Spanish allows for smoother navigation of tasks like grocery shopping or asking for directions. It also shows respect and effort, fostering deeper relationships with locals and helping you feel more integrated in your new environment. I started with an online tutor, took a couple of classes locally in Guadalajara and now using a in-person tutor.
Steps to Learn Spanish Effectively
1. Start with Basic Resources: Apps like Duolingo, Babbel, and Anki flashcards are ideal for building foundational vocabulary. Transition to local Spanish classes, such as those offered by IMAC in Guadalajara or Instituto de Español de Puerto Vallarta, for structured learning and networking with other expats.
2. Practice Daily with Locals: Use simple phrases in everyday interactions, such as greeting neighbors or ordering at a market. Focus on practical vocabulary like “¿Cuánto cuesta?” (How much does it cost?) and immerse yourself in Spanish media—watch Mexican TV, listen to podcasts, and read local headlines to improve your listening and reading skills.
Overcoming Common Challenges
Fear of mistakes is natural, but Mexicans are patient and supportive of your efforts. Laughing at errors can even serve as an icebreaker. Regional slang (e.g., chido for “cool” or ¿Qué onda? for “What’s up?”) and the fast pace of conversation may feel daunting. Politely ask locals to slow down or explain unfamiliar phrases. Active listening and consistent practice will build confidence over time.
Pro Tips for Success
Set realistic goals, such as learning 5–10 new words daily, and celebrate small wins like completing your first full conversation. Join conversation groups or language exchanges to practice regularly and avoid over-relying on English. Immersion and consistency are key—challenge yourself to use Spanish as much as possible, and remember that every effort contributes to your progress.
CULTURAL ADAPTION: EMBRACING LIFE IN MEXICO
Adapting to Mexican culture has been one of the most rewarding aspects of my move. The slower pace of life, deep-rooted traditions, and strong sense of community have taught me invaluable lessons about connection, patience, and perspective. Understanding and respecting cultural norms is essential to integrating into society and enjoying the richness of Mexican life.
Key Cultural Norms to Note
Family-Oriented Society: Family is at the Heart of Everything. In Mexico, family ties are deeply valued and often take precedence over work or social commitments. Large family gatherings are common, often featuring laughter, music, and incredible homemade food.
Being Invited to Family Events: If you’re invited to a family gathering, accept the invitation! It’s a sign of trust and inclusion. These events may range from birthday parties to casual Sunday meals, often with a festive atmosphere.
Role of Extended Family: It’s not uncommon for multiple generations to live under one roof or within close proximity. When you meet a Mexican man, it is highly likely they live at home with their family. Elders are highly respected and often play an integral role in decision-making.
Pro Tip: When attending a family gathering, it’s customary to greet everyone individually with a handshake, hug, or kiss on the cheek, depending on the level of familiarity.
“Mexican Time”
Flexibility Over Punctuality: The concept of “Mexican time” reflects a more relaxed approach to punctuality. Plans often start later than scheduled, whether it’s a social event or a casual meeting.
Adapting to the Pace: This cultural trait taught me to be more flexible and patient. It’s not about disrespect but rather about prioritizing relationships and enjoying the moment. This can be frustrating at times but I have learned that it is easier to adapt than try to get people to be punctual.
How to Approach It:
For social events, expect a buffer of 30 minutes to an hour. Arriving too early might even catch your host unprepared!
For professional settings, punctuality is more expected, but slight delays are still common.
Pro Tip: If timing is critical, clarify expectations by saying something like “¿Es a las 7 en punto?” (Is it at 7 sharp?).
Social Customs and Politeness
Everyday Politeness: Simple courtesies like saying “gracias” (thank you), “por favor” (please), and “buenos días” (good morning) are highly valued. These small gestures create a positive impression and help build connections.
Greetings: A handshake is common for first meetings, while a kiss on the cheek is customary for closer friends or family. Men may pat each other on the back as part of a handshake. When entering a room, it’s polite to greet everyone individually rather than just offering a general hello.
Goodbyes: Similar to greetings, farewells are often done individually. A quick wave is considered impersonal.
Pro Tip: Avoid skipping greetings and goodbyes—it’s seen as rude or dismissive.
The Importance of Hospitality
Generosity as a Norm: Mexicans are famously hospitable. If you visit someone’s home, you’ll often be offered food, drinks, or even gifts. Declining can sometimes be perceived as impolite, so it’s better to accept with gratitude, even if it’s something small.
Hosting Etiquette: When hosting, it’s important to go the extra mile to ensure guests feel welcomed. Food and drinks should be plentiful, and attention to detail is appreciated.
Pro Tip: If invited to someone’s home, bring a small gift like flowers, wine, or dessert. It’s a thoughtful gesture that shows appreciation.
SAFETY & SECURITY IN MEXICO
Safety was a significant concern before I moved, especially as a member of the gay community. However, I’ve found that with proper precautions and awareness, Mexico can be a welcoming and safe place for expats, including gay individuals. Here’s an expanded guide to staying safe in Mexico, with specific tips for gay expats.
Understanding Safety in Mexico: Facts and Statistics
Crime Trends:
Crime rates in Mexico vary widely by region. Some states face challenges related to organized crime, while others—like Yucatán—rank among the safest areas in Latin America. For example, Mérida, the capital of Yucatán, has a homicide rate comparable to that of European countries like Switzerland.
Tourist destinations such as Puerto Vallarta, Mexico City, and Tulum are relatively safe and take measures to protect visitors due to their economic importance.
One recent statistic (from World Population Review) ranking countries based on safety, Mexico ranks five places farther down the list than the United States.
LGBTQ+ Rights and Safety:
Mexico is increasingly gay-friendly, with same-sex marriage legal in all 32 states as of 2022. Many major cities, such as Mexico City and Guadalajara, have vibrant gay communities and pride events.
Despite progress, acceptance varies by region. Urban areas and tourist hubs tend to be more open-minded, while smaller towns or rural regions may hold more conservative attitudes.
Tips for Staying Safe in Mexico
While safety concerns exist, taking precautions can help you feel confident and secure. Below are general safety tips along with advice tailored for gay individuals.
General Safety Tips
Choose Neighborhoods Wisely:
Neighborhood safety varies widely. For example, I live in Colonia Americana in Guadalajara, a trendy and gay-friendly area known for its vibrant atmosphere and relative safety.
Research neighborhoods using online forums, expat groups, and local recommendations before committing to housing.
Stay Aware of Your Surroundings:
Avoid displaying valuables like expensive jewelry or electronics, especially in crowded areas.
Use ride-hailing apps like Uber or Didi for transportation, particularly at night.
Be Cautious in Public Spaces: Avoid walking alone in unfamiliar areas, especially after dark. Stick to well-lit, busy streets and use reliable transportation when needed.
Blend In Where Possible: Dress modestly and avoid drawing unnecessary attention to yourself, especially in conservative areas. This advice applies to anyone, regardless of sexual orientation.
Gay Safety Tips
Stick to Gay-Friendly Areas:
Cities like Puerto Vallarta, Mexico City, and Guadalajara are known for their thriving gay scenes and are generally safe for gay individuals. In these cities, you’ll find gay-friendly bars, clubs, and community spaces.
Be Mindful of Displays of Affection: Public displays of affection (PDAs) can be more accepted in urban areas, but in conservative regions, they might draw unwanted attention. Gauge the environment and act accordingly.
Research Venues in Advance: Before visiting bars, clubs, or other social venues, check reviews and recommendations to ensure they are gay-friendly. Apps like Grindr or Google Maps often have user reviews that highlight safe and welcoming establishments.
Travel with Trusted Friends: If you’re new to a city or attending an event, go with someone you trust. Being part of a group can increase safety in unfamiliar areas.
Know Your Rights: Mexico’s legal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals include anti-discrimination laws. However, enforcement can vary. If you encounter discrimination, remain calm and seek help from local authorities or LGBTQ+ organizations.
Resources for LGBTQ+ Expats: Look for LGBTQ+ support groups or advocacy organizations in your area. For example, Colectivo Vallarta and Diversidad Jalisco support LGBTQ+ rights in Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara, respectively.
KEY THINGS TO DO WHEN YOU ARRIVE
Finish up your residency process at the Insituto National de Migracion (INM) where you will receive your residency card. You will need to make an appointment in advance. They will need proof of address (usually a utility bill will suffice).
Request an RFC (Mexican tax identification number) at your local SAT office. You will need an RFC to open a bank account, buy a car and apply for IMSS. You will need an appointment in advance.
Open a Mexican Bank account. You will need your CURP, RFC, Mexican Telephone number and address.
Rent an apartment: check Facebook marketplace or Inmuebles24.com for listings in your location. Also walk around your desired neighborhood to see if there are any for rent signs.
FAQS
What visa do I need to live in Mexico long-term?
To live in Mexico long-term, you’ll need a Temporary Resident Visa (good for up to 4 years) or a Permanent Resident Visa. The right one for you depends on factors like income, length of stay, and personal circumstances. Begin the process at a Mexican consulate in your home country.
How much money do I need to move to Mexico?
The cost varies based on your lifestyle and location. Budget at least $5,000–$10,000 USD for moving expenses, such as visa fees, housing deposits, and transportation. Monthly living expenses can range from $2,500 to $5,000 USD, depending on your lifestyle and city.
Is it safe to live in Mexico?
Yes, many areas in Mexico are safe. Research neighborhoods carefully, avoid risky areas, and use common sense (e.g., avoid walking alone at night and don’t flash valuables). Cities like Guadalajara, Mérida, and parts of Mexico City are popular with expats for their safety and amenities.
Can I work remotely for a U.S. company while living in Mexico?
Yes, many expats work remotely for U.S. companies while living in Mexico. Check the tax implications for both the U.S. and Mexico. Consulting a tax professional is highly recommended.
How can I open a bank account in Mexico?
To open a bank account in Mexico, you’ll need a Temporary or Permanent Resident Visa, proof of residency, an RFC (tax ID), and a Mexican phone number. Popular banks for expats include Santander, BBVA, and Banorte.
Do I need to speak Spanish to live in Mexico?
While it’s possible to get by in tourist areas with limited Spanish, learning the language greatly enhances your experience. Start with basic phrases and build your skills through apps, classes, and daily practice.
What is healthcare like in Mexico?
Mexico offers high-quality and affordable healthcare. Private clinics and hospitals are modern and accessible, while the public IMSS system provides basic care for residents. Many expats combine private health insurance with IMSS for comprehensive coverage.
How do I find housing in Mexico?
Start with short-term rentals through Airbnb or similar platforms while exploring neighborhoods. Long-term rentals can be found on Facebook groups, local real estate websites, or by walking around and noting rental signs. Negotiating rent is common and can often lower costs.
Can I bring my pet to Mexico?
Yes, you can bring your pet to Mexico, but you’ll need to comply with Mexican import regulations. The rules have changed recently, what you will need to bring your pet to Mexico:
Minimum age: The dog must be at least six months old.
Microchip: An ISO-compatible microchip.
CDC Form: Complete it two to ten days before the trip.
Rabies vaccination.
Health certificate including Screw worm examination.
What’s the best way to meet people and build a community?
Join expat Facebook groups, attend local events like farmers’ markets and art fairs, or volunteer with charities to meet like-minded people. Taking language classes is also a great way to connect with locals and other expats.
How to a get a Mexican Drivers License
To obtain a driver’s license in Mexico as a resident, you’ll need to visit your local Secretaría de Movilidad y Transporte (SEMOVI) or equivalent office with required documents, including your Temporary or Permanent Resident Visa, CURP, proof of address, and valid ID. Some states may also require your RFC or foreign driver’s license. You’ll typically need to pass a vision test, a written exam on traffic laws, and a practical driving test unless your foreign license can be exchanged. Costs range from $20–$50 USD depending on the state and license validity (1–5 years). The process is usually completed in one day, and having a Mexican license ensures compliance with local laws as a resident.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Moving to Mexico has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life. While challenges like navigating bureaucracy or adapting to cultural differences exist, they’re far outweighed by the warmth of the people, rich culture, and incredible quality of life.
Whether you’re sipping coffee in a sunlit plaza, exploring vibrant mercados, or hiking through lush jungles, Mexico offers endless opportunities for adventure and personal growth. With preparation and an open mind, you’ll soon see why so many expats call this beautiful country home.
What excites you most about moving to Mexico? Let me know in the comments, or reach out with your questions—I’m here to help!
About the Author
Tim is a seasoned travel writer and the creator of Out in Mexico, a dedicated resource for gay travelers exploring Mexico’s vibrant destinations. After relocating to Guadalajara, he has spent years immersing himself in Mexico’s gay culture, from the iconic beaches of Puerto Vallarta to the nightlife of Mexico City.
With firsthand experience in Mexico’s gay scene, Tim has personally visited the bars, hotels, and events featured in this guide. His insights have helped gay travelers plan unforgettable trips while ensuring they feel safe, welcomed, and informed.
When he’s not writing, you’ll find him sipping a mezcal cocktail at a bar in Guadalajara or travel to a new exciting destination in Mexico.
According to a press release dated Jan. 30 and time-stamped 7:38 p.m., the city of Dallas has officially caved to the rainbow-hating homophobes in Texas government, and Oak Lawn’s privately-funded rainbow crosswalks — and any other nonstandard crosswalk designs in the city — will be removed within the next 90 days.
The press release says: “The City of Dallas has notified the Texas Department of Transportation that it will comply with TxDOT’s directive requiring removal or correction of non-compliant pavement markings.”
The TxDOT “request” (aka Greg Abbott’s homophobic demand in order to kowtow to Trump, just like he did with the mid-decade congressional redistricting and by turning over Texas voter rolls to the feds) covers 30 decorative crosswalks citywide, the press release said.
“In a letter signed by Dallas City Manager Kimberly Bizor Tolbert, the city notified the director of the TxDOT Traffic Safety Division that it will comply with the order within 90 days,” the press release continues, quoting Tolbert as saying that “The city appreciates TxDOT’s partnership in sustaining safe multimodal transportation in Dallas. The city will work with affected communities on ways to recognize their neighborhoods.”
The press release concludes: “TxDOT rejected the city’s appeal of the directive to remove pavement markings stating the intersections identified did not meet current Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices requirements. TxDOT emphasized that all treatments must comply with the TMUTCD, the Secretary of Transportation’s Safe Road Initiative, and the governor’s directive issued Oct. 8, 2025, which prioritize uniformity and predictability in traffic control devices statewide.”
Considering that numerous studies and incidental data have proven that creative crosswalk designs actually enhance safety, the obvious truth is that Abbott and his minions don’t actually give a fat rat’s ass about safety; they just want to try and suppress the LGBTQ+ community and, at the same time, lick Trump’s boots.
Knowing our LGBTQ+/Oak Lawn community, however, we feel sure that while the homophobes may be winning this battle in the Rainbow War, the fight continues. We expect to see even more rainbows waving proudly across Oak Lawn soon.
Missouri’s Supreme Court upheld the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors this week, along with a prohibition on Medicaid coverage of gender-affirming care for anyone in the state.
As the Missouri Independent reports, the court’s unanimous decision upholds a 2024 circuit court ruling in a case challenging Senate Bill 49. The law, signed by Gov. Mike Parson (R) in 2023, bans minors from accessing any form of gender-affirming care, including puberty blockers, hormone replacement therapy, and surgeries. It also bans the state’s Medicaid program from covering gender-affirming care for people of all ages.
The challenge against the law was brought by Lambda Legal and the ACLU of Missouri on behalf of three families of transgender young people, medical providers, and LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations, who argued that the law should be subject to heightened scrutiny, a more rigorous legal standard applied to cases involving the classification of individuals by specific characteristics like gender.
According to the Missouri Independent, the state Supreme Court rejected that argument, as had the lower court. While plaintiffs had argued that the law discriminates on the basis of sex and transgender status, Judge Kelly Broniec wrote in the court’s decision that S.B. 49 “classifies only based on medical use and age.”
The court’s reasoning echoes that in the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last year in United States v. Skrmetti, which held that Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth does not discriminate on the basis of sex or transgender status.
As the Missouri Independent notes, Supreme Court precedent allows lawmakers broad discretion when it comes to issues “fraught with medical and scientific uncertainty.”
While for decades there has been broad scientific consensus — including among all major American medical associations — that gender-affirming care is safe, evidence-based, and often lifesaving for minors experiencing gender dysphoria, conservative organizations and some American media outlets have made massive strides in recent years in sowing doubt about that consensus.
In September, Lambda Legal attorney Nora Huppert argued that the lower court’s decision upholding S.B. 49 included “legal and factual errors.” But writing for the Missouri Supreme Court this week, Broniec nonetheless said that the state had “demonstrated the ongoing debate among medical and ethical experts regarding the risks and benefits associated with the treatments at issue.”
The court also rejected arguments that the Medicaid ban violates Missouri’s constitution, with Broniec noting that adults in the state can still pay out-of-pocket to receive gender-affirming care.
Gillian Wilcox, director of litigation at the ACLU of Missouri, responded to the decision saying that it “not only allows the state to target transgender Missourians access to health care but also leaves everyone’s health care options at the whims of politicians, should certain care ever fall into the political arena.”
Under a new bill introduced Wednesday, the Idaho Legislature would ban local policies in more than a dozen cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
The bill, written by the Idaho Family Policy Center, a conservative Christian group, and sponsored by Nampa Republican state Rep. Bruce Skaug, would block local governments in Idaho from having more strict antidiscrimination policies than established in state law.
Skaug argued that the varying local rules hinder economic growth.
“In addition to threatening our religious freedoms, all of these conflicting local antidiscrimination ordinances create a tangled web of red tape that varies from city to city, county to county,” Skaug told lawmakers. “In the business sector, it burdens the entrepreneurs and the employers.”
Since 2011, 13 Idaho cities and towns have passed nondiscrimination ordinances including Sandpoint, Boise, Idaho Falls, Moscow, Lewiston, Meridian, Ketchum, Hailey, Bellevue, Driggs, Victor, Pocatello and Coeur d’Alene. In 2020, Ada County, home to Boise, passed its own, KTVB reported.
Chelsea Gaona-Lincoln, executive director of Add the Words Idaho, a group that has pushed for LGBTQ+ antidiscrimination protections, called the bill embarrassing.
“There are real issues Idaho needs addressed,” she said in a statement. “Lawmakers should move on and find something meaningful and responsible to do with the time and taxpayers’ money. Let queer and trans people live in peace.”
Idaho Family Policy Center, which wrote the bill, echoed Skaug’s arguments
The Idaho House Local Government Committee voted to introduce Skaug’s bill Wednesday, teeing it up for a full committee hearing with public testimony. All 14 Republicans on the committee supported introducing it, and the committee’s two Democrats opposed it.
Rep. Steve Berch, a Boise Democrat, called the bill “an overreach of legislative power or state power over the cities and communities.”
Skaug told the committee that the bill would ban more than just local antidiscrimination policies for LGBTQ+ protections, saying it would also prevent housing-related measures that deal with income and familial status. In an interview after the committee hearing, Skaug couldn’t immediately share which localities have those other nondiscrimination measures.
In preparing the bill, Skaug told the Idaho Capital Sun that he worked with the Idaho Family Policy Center and the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group.
In a statement, Idaho Family Policy Center President Blaine Conzatti said local antidiscrimination ordinances “are frequently weaponized against small business owners — especially wedding vendors or those offering creative design services.”
“No small business owner should ever be forced to choose between violating their sincerely held religious beliefs or leaving the marketplace altogether,” he said. “… Government officials have forced bakers, photographers, florists, graphic designers, and wedding venue operators to participate in same-sex wedding ceremonies and pride festivals.”
Planned Parenthood critiques bill as stripping local control
Rep. Marco Erickson, an Idaho Falls Republican, made the motion to introduce the bill in committee.
In 2013, the Idaho Falls City Council first passed an ordinance barring LGBTQ+ discrimination in housing and employment, becoming the seventh Idaho town with such protections at the time, Boise State Public Radio reported. In 2020, the Idaho Falls City Council expanded the discrimination protections to public accommodations, the Post Register reported.
In a statement, Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates’ Idaho State Director Mistie DelliCarpini-Tolman critiqued the bill as stripping local control.
“In places across Idaho, locally elected officials are ready and willing to stop discrimination, and this bill blocks them from doing exactly that, what voters elected them to do,” Tolman said. “That isn’t small government. It’s a uniform denial of basic protections that tells LGBTQ+ Idahoans and other marginalized residents that their safety and dignity don’t matter.”
The Trump Administration ended $25 million in annual federal support to the nonprofit Trevor Project, which provides a suicide hotline for LGBTQ youth. But now, thanks to a $45 million donation from MacKenzie Scott, the nonprofit says they are on a mission to help those who need it most. And they’re seeing more demand than in years past.
Two bills in Florida advanced out of committee last week that would give the state attorney general more power to investigate and press felony charges against health care professionals who provide gender-affirming care in the state, including against therapists who discuss gender issues with minor patients and pharmacists who fill prescriptions that may be used as gender-affirming care.
Last week, the Criminal Justice Subcommittee passed H.B. 743 in a 12-5 vote, Florida Politics reports. The bill would allow state Attorney General James Uthmeier to sue health care practitioners for up to $100,000 per violation for providing gender-affirming care to minors. Mainstream medical organizations support gender-affirming care for trans kids because it has been shown to be life-saving and safe.
S.B. 1010 would make it a felony for doctors, school counselors, or psychologists to advise minors on gender-affirming care or “aid or abet” another health care professional in helping minors get gender-affirming care. The bill gained near-unanimous support from the state senate’s Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs, according to the Florida Phoenix.
If that version of the bill passes, medical professionals could get a $100,000 fine per violation and up to five years in prison.
“We have to uphold the principles and standards that made this country great, biblical, constitutional law, and order at all costs. And sometimes that stings,” state Rep. Taylor Yarkowsky said at last week’s hearing.
The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Lauren Melo (R), stressed that pharmacists would be punished under her bill, something she says is necessary because, she claimed, health care professionals are “committing fraud” by prescribing gender-affirming care medications but recording the purpose of the medications as something other than gender-affirming care.
“What we’re seeing is there’s coding that’s actually being used that is becoming the problem, and hundreds of thousands of dollars is spent per child for them to transition and codes are being misrepresented where they are saying that it’s an indoctrination disorder instead of saying it’s a gender identity disorder,” she said.
Democrats stressed that the bill could have unintentional side effects. State Rep. Kelly Skidmore (D) said that the bill is not about gender-affirming care but is being pushed by state Attorney General Uthmeier to expand his power.
“It is about giving one individual and maybe his successors authority that they don’t deserve and they cannot manage,” she said, referring to Uthmeier’s involvement in the Hope Florida scandal, where state Republicans are accused of laundering money and committing fraud. “They’ve proven that they cannot be trusted. This is a terrible bill.”
State Rep. Mike Gottlieb (D) said that doctors might be scared from prescribing hormonal medications to people with severe menstrual symptoms lest a pharmacist misinterpret the reason for the prescription.
“You’re going to see doctors not wanting to prescribe those kinds of medications because they’re now subject to a $100,000 penalty,” he said. “We’re really not considering what we’re doing and some of the collateral harms that it’s having.”
Behavioral health care professional Savannah Thompson told WUSF that the bill would make it more difficult for doctors to even talk to trans patients.
“This could increase the feelings of fear from my clients who are under 18, but it also can increase the likelihood that these professionals won’t be able to talk with their clients, honestly and openly, to give them the care and the support that they deserve and need,” she said.
The U.S. agency that enforces laws prohibiting workplace discrimination on Thursday rescinded legal guidance that had strengthened protections against unlawful harassment for LGBTQ workers and women who have abortions.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission voted 2-1 to repeal the 2024 guidance, which had incorporated major court rulings and laws passed in the roughly 25 years since the agency last updated its guidance.
The five-member EEOC can make rules and issue guidance explaining how federal laws that protect workers from discrimination based on characteristics such as race, sex, religion and disability should be applied. A separate arm of the agency, led by the general counsel, vets discrimination complaints filed by workers and can broker settlements and bring lawsuits against employers accused of violating those laws.
EEOC guidance is not legally binding, but lays out a blueprint for how the commission will enforce anti-discrimination laws and is often cited by judges deciding novel legal issues.
Since President Donald Trump took office last year, his appointees at the EEOC have stopped pursuing most cases involving transgender workers and have launched probes into workplace diversity policies and alleged antisemitism on college campuses.
The repeal of the 2024 guidance was expected and comes less than three months after the U.S. Senate confirmed Trump nominee Brittany Panuccio to the commission, restoring a quorum of three members and giving Republicans a 2-1 majority.
The commission in the 2024 guidance had adopted a broad view of the type of conduct that amounts to unlawful workplace harassment, saying it included discriminating against employees because they have abortions or use contraception and refusing to use transgender workers’ preferred names and pronouns.
EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, a Trump appointee, ahead of Thursday’s vote said the EEOC had overstepped its authority by issuing guidance that imposed new obligations on employers rather than interpreting existing law.
But critics of the move said it could discourage employers from preventing harassment and leave workers without recourse when they face it.
“This action is likely to increase the amount of harassment that occurs in workplaces across the country,” a dozen former EEOC and U.S. Department of Labor officials said in a joint statement before the vote. Most of the officials were appointed by Democratic presidents.
The 2024 guidance covered an array of topics, including a landmark 2020 Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County that said workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is a form of unlawful sex discrimination. The commission had said that while Bostock involved a gay worker’s termination and not harassment claims, the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the decision extended to cases alleging harassment of LGBTQ workers.
A federal judge in Texas last year had blocked that portion of the guidance, saying that finding was novel and was beyond the scope of the EEOC’s powers in issuing guidance. Two other judges separately barred the agency from enforcing the guidance against religious organizations that sued.
For Julia Hewitt, the removal of LGBTQ+ services from the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline and potential funding freezes and cuts are a personal and professional issue.
As a suicide prevention leader with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, a lived experience adviser with Vibrant Emotional Health, which oversees the crisis line in Texas, and a parent of an LGBTQ child raised in Texas, Hewitt, who as a child witnessed her mother struggle with suicidal ideation, has spent decades putting her energy into providing reliable crisis services for everyone who needs them.
But now, she’s watching the foundation she and others created crumble.
“It was a punch to the gut because if you work or volunteer in this space, you know the families who are impacted by this; it can be hard to reconcile when you know how much good this does,” Hewitt said. “When access narrows for those at highest risk, the system becomes less protective overall.”
The 988 Lifeline was created through bipartisan legislation signed into law by President Donald Trump during his first term. This nationwide network of locally based crisis centers offers one-on-one support for mental health, suicide, and substance use-related problems for anyone 24/7.
When someone called 988 in the past, they would hear a greeting message, followed by a menu of choices offering access to specially trained counselors for veterans, Spanish speakers, and LGBTQ+ youth, or sometimes a local crisis counselor.
But last summer, the Trump administration announced in a press release that it will no longer silo LGBTQ+ youth services, which had been the “Press 3 option” for 988 callers, to focus on serving “all help seekers,” saying that these specific LGBTQ+ services had become too expensive.
The Trump administration and theSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the federal agency that provides the majority of the funding for the 988 Lifeline, said the specialized LGBTQ subnetwork’s initial pilot budget of $33 million had been exceeded and unifying services for all callers was a better option.
After the change, only veterans and Spanish speakers still received a tailored option through the 988 call line.
The call line had received nearly 1.3 million contacts nationally from LGBTQ+ people since its launch in 2022 — leaving a void that Texas crisis care centers, already operating at a $7 million funding deficit, are expected to fill.
In Texas, calls made to the line have increased over the years. In December 2025, the Texas 988 system received 25,511. A year prior, that figure was 18,916 and in December 2023, it was 14,961. It’s not clear from publicly available data how many calls are rerouted to LGBTQ+ subnetworks.
Texas Health and Human Services officials said the agency doesn’t have data on how many calls are rerouted to a subnetwork.
Veterans and LGBTQ+ youth have a higher risk of suicide compared to the general population, and canceling specialized services for only one group has mental health experts questioning the administration’s true intent.
“The program was created with overwhelming bipartisan support because, despite our political differences, we should all agree that every young person’s life is worth saving,” Jaymes Black, CEO of the Trevor Project, an organization that helped create option 3, said in a statement. “I am heartbroken that this administration has decided to say, loudly and clearly, that they believe some young people’s lives are not worth saving.”
This comes at a time when some federal funding for the hotline is set to expire, and budget freezes and cuts are wreaking havoc on the network of local crisis centers that the entire 988 infrastructure depends on.
“Currently, Texas’s 988 system faces a convergence of challenges,” said Christine Busse, a peer policy fellow for the Texas branch of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, a nonprofit mental health organization that provides education and peer-to-peer support. “Without additional investment, meeting current demand — let alone absorbing the additional contacts previously handled by specialized services — will remain difficult.”
The removal of option 3
For many LGBTQ+ youth, the hotline was a safe space to be themselves, where they could be transferred to specialists within the LGBTQ+ Youth Subnetwork who usually had the lived experience to relate to them and help them talk through problems like drug and alcohol abuse, bullying, relationship troubles and suicidal thoughts.
Busse said the hotline handled up to 70,000 contacts per month nationwide, and her organization is troubled by its sudden removal because those young people are more than four times as likely to attempt suicide as their peers.
Specialized services are still offered by the Trevor Project and other organizations, but advocates say including them in 988 made it easy for people in crisis to get help by remembering just three numbers.
Now that options have been removed, LGBTQ+ youth are left with 988 dispatchers who are trained to handle a crisis, but might not have the lived experience or training needed to make someone feel safe during an emergency.
“While all callers can still reach trained counselors through 988, the loss of Option 3 eliminates a service designed to address the specific needs of a higher-risk population,” Busse said.
Some states like California have decided to address this issue by having experts from the Trevor Project train their operators. However, Texas lawmakers have not committed any additional resources to this effort.
“LGBTQ+ young people need more resources to end suicide, not fewer,” said Mark Henson, vice president of advocacy and government affairs at The Trevor Project.
Hewitt said she is confident that local operators will receive the specialized LGBTQ+ training to provide the needed care, but the issue is why they need to do it at all.
“There was an entire network that was created just for this, and that is the difference,” she said. “But this means additional training, and that equates to time, experience, people, and hours.”
Busse said another advantage of option 3 was that it routed calls from LGBTQ youth out of the 988 system to other organizations, and its cancellation means a heavier workload for everyone in the system.
The month-to-month data on the crisis hotline shows a steady increase in calls to Texas crisis centers that were already overburdened before the removal of the LGBTQ+ subnetworks.
“Texas’s 988 system was already strained before the removal of Option 3,” Busse said. “Without additional investment, meeting current demand — let alone absorbing the additional contacts previously handled by specialized services — will remain difficult.”
The cost of saving a life
The Texas 988 system currently receives $19 million in funding from two federal grants: the Mental Health Block Grant and the 988 State and Territory Improvement Award. The latter is set to expire in September, and it’s unclear whether Congress will extend it or whether the Trump administration will establish new funding streams.
This comes at a time when local crisis care centers, where many of the 988 call centers operate out of or partner with for their resources, are seeing investment in their services disappear and reappear at the whims of the federal government.
In a span of 24 hours earlier this month, the Trump administration announced wide-ranging budget cuts that many in health care warned would cripple mental health and crisis services across the nation. Amid a national outcry, the administration reversed its decision before the end of the day.
“People got letters, and everyone was panicking, and then it got reversed,” Hewitt said. “A great outcome, but this terminal uncertainty is creating a really poor experience for not only the client but also the person answering the calls.”
The 988 system wasn’t meant to be supported by the federal government forever, and Texas lawmakers like state Sen. José Menéndez have attempted to create a safety net for it.
Last year, lawmakers established the 988 Trust Fund through House Bill 5342 and required a study on sustainable funding mechanisms, including a potential state telecommunications fee, due by December. However, no state dollars have been appropriated to the trust.
Menéndez, who authored the bill that created the trust fund, said the idea of using a telecommunications fee, similar to the fee that supports 911, was quickly shot down at the Capitol.
“I’m concerned that if we don’t have any state funds, 988 is going to have to get reliant on philanthropy, fundraising, and other methods, and we have already started reaching out about how people can make contributions because this year some funds run out,” he said.
As federal funds continue to dwindle and the state shows little interest in propping up the service, the future of 988 in Texas might depend on donations from Texans.
“That uncertainty is precisely why legislative action is imperative,” Busse said. “The infrastructure exists; what is needed now is the commitment to fund it. Without dedicated funding mechanisms, such as a telecommunications fee, Texans risk facing a mental health crisis without the community support network that took years to build.”
For mental health support for LGBTQ youth, call the Trevor Project’s 24/7 toll-free support line at 866-488-7386. For trans peer support, call the Trans Lifeline at 877-565-8860. You can also reach a trained crisis counselor through the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988.
Iowa’s public K-12 schools would be barred from teaching students about topics related to gender identity and sexual orientation at all grade levels under a bill expanding what critics have dubbed the state’s “Don’t Say Gay” law.
It would subject all of Iowa’s K-12 students to a law Gov. Kim Reynolds signed in 2023 that bans instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation through sixth grade. The wide-ranging education legislation also ordered schools to remove books that depict sex acts.
A Senate subcommittee voted 2-1 Wednesday, Jan. 21, to advance Senate Study Bill 2003, which would extend the prohibition on LGBTQ-related teaching through high school.
“I think just as not all parents want others to teach their children about sex education because it involves family religious beliefs about sexuality, so not all parents want others to teach children about sexual orientation and gender identity because it too involves family religious beliefs about sexuality and sexual ethics,” Sen. Sandy Salmon, R-Janesville, said.
She and Sen. Jesse Green, R-Boone, who introduced the bill, voted to advance it.
Iowa’s 2023 law, Senate File 496, is being challenged as unconstitutional in a federal lawsuit. A federal judge initially granted an injunction blocking parts of the law, including the ban on teaching about gender orientation and sexual identity, while the lawsuit is decided.
But the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed his decision, allowing the law to take effect. Attorneys argued the law’s constitutionality in federal court last week.
Sen. Molly Donahue, D-Marion, voted against moving the bill forward, calling it a “distraction” from other issues facing the state.
“Iowans are definitely tired of this type of legislation, and we’re seeing that with the voting records, not just in Iowa but across the United States,” Donahue said. “We should be focused on prioritizing public schools, funding affordability for our people in this state and making sure that we’re balancing a budget in this state that is currently over $1 billion in deficit. We are focusing on the wrong things when we bring bills like this.”
Iowa is one of several Republican-led states, including Florida, with similar prohibitions on classroom teaching about gender identity and sexual orientation.
The bill says that Iowa’s public school districts and charter schools cannot provide “any program, curriculum, test, survey, questionnaire, promotion or instruction relating to gender theory or sexual orientation” to K-12 students.
Similar legislation has not advanced in past years, including in 2025 after a House proposal stalled once it passed out of subcommittee.
Opponents of the bill say ‘LGBTQ people exist’ regardless of classroom instruction
Opponents outnumbered supporters of the bill at the hearing Wednesday at the Capitol, as LGBTQ Iowans and LGBTQ rights groups shared opposition with lawmakers, while religious and conservative groups spoke in favor of the measure.
Kaylara Hoadley, of Mason City, cried as she showed lawmakers a photograph of her 15-year-old nonbinary child, saying the bill does not keep students safe.
As a caseworker for families in crisis, Hoadley said she supports youth who are homeless or facing other crises whose only safe space is their school.
“When the law silences teachers, counselors and staff, vulnerable youth suffer and suicide rates increase. … When does a child’s suicide matter to you?” she asked the Republican senators as her voice wavered.
Melissa Peterson, representing the Iowa State Education Association, said questions remain as to whether the current law is discriminatory toward LGBTQ students as it remains tied up in court and urged lawmakers to oppose expanding the law.
“We want to get back to basics and provide a safe learning environment for every single one of our students as closely to as free from discrimination as possible,” Peterson said.
Damian Thompson, external affairs director for Iowa Safe Schools, said the bill would amplify the existing law’s constitutional problems by applying it to older students who have well-established constitutional rights.
“High school students can vote soon, they can serve in the military and they’re expected to understand complex and social and health issues as they enter adulthood,” Thompson said. “Federal courts have been consistently clear that students do not shed their First Amendment rights when they enter a public school.”
Bethany Snyder, of Urbandale, who has a trans partner and is a lesbian mother to a freshman at Valley High School, said silence isolates children and does not protect them.
“My partner and I grew up in that silence,” Snyder said. “We didn’t see ourselves reflected in school. We learned very early what shame sounds like in the absence of words. High school should prepare students for the real world and the real world. LGBTQ people exist as parents, coworkers, legislators, historical figures and leaders and families like mine and families like hers.”
Her daughter Evelynn Snyder-Maul said she has never received instruction on gender identity in school beyond sharing that she has a trans father and queer mother.
“If I’m telling someone about my family, could I get reported?” Snyder-Maul said. “However, that is the least of my concerns. Lawmakers who want to pass this bill are snowflakes. You think that love is inappropriate and you think that it is forcing kids to believe they like the same gender. If your kid is gay, whether they are taught that gay exists or not, they are still going to be gay.”
Supporters say schools should teach ‘fundamentals,’ not discuss LGBTQ topics
Danny Carroll, a senior policy adviser with The Family Leader and a former state lawmaker, said the bill would “remove unnecessary distraction” from Iowa classrooms.
“I think Iowans have grown a little bit weary of the distraction — and sometimes very loud and profane distraction — that gender theory has brought on, and I think they’re inclined to think perhaps we should return our schools to some of the fundamentals of learning and put this aside,” Carroll said. “I can see no way that this would interfere with teaching goodwill, friendship, respect for each other.”
Patty Alexander, a retired educator from Indianola, said discussing sexual identity is not an educator’s job.
“We do not believe in labeling students or grouping them by sexual preferences,” Alexander said. “We are here to meet their learning needs. We are not mental health counselors, and forcing us to group and label students only divides and causes rifts. Forcing us to discuss sexuality furthers the mistrust of educators between parents and their children.”
Jeff Pitts, representing the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition, said the group supports expanding the existing law through high school.
“Our schools are not the place to promote political ideology,” Pitts said.
You must be logged in to post a comment.