As a transgender Texan, updating my gender marker was a transformative experience. Now, others in my state face obstacles that prevent them from doing the same

This blog is originally appeared at Them

With Trump potentially returning to office, I’m concerned that more transgender people will be denied the right that had such a profound impact on my life.

When I learned on August 21st that the Texas Department of Public Safety had quietly revoked the ability to change your gender on driver’s licenses and birth certificates, I was stunned. Devastated. The already daunting process of officially changing one’s name and gender marker had just been taken away. Trans Texans are now stripped of a right that once allowed me to live with less fear. And as Donald Trump nears a potential return to office, many are fearful that trans Americans nationwide could face the same loss.

On a random Tuesday in December 2020, I made the decision to start hormone replacement therapy (HRT). By then, I had been using they/them pronouns for two years and had undergone top surgery eight months earlier. For years, I had thought about beginning HRT, hoping it would help me escape a life where people assumed I was a woman based solely on my appearance. That day, I finally felt ready to silence the voices in my head telling me I’d be letting others down by embracing who I truly was. I was ready to step out of the shadows—out of the expectations others placed on me—and into my own light. I went to an LGBTQ+ clinic, got a prescription for testosterone, and, in that moment, I felt like my life was finally beginning.

And then everything changed.

By April 2021, my voice had deepened, stubble began appearing on my face, and I no longer had a period—physical changes I embraced with open arms. Strangers began noticing too, and suddenly, I was being treated differently. The looks I once got as a perceived butch lesbian shifted to confused stares, discomfort, and sometimes, outright disdain.

‘Dropping off flowers for your wife?’ a receptionist at a gynecologist’s office asked me that same April. ‘Not quite,’ I replied with a nervous laugh. ‘I’m here for an appointment.’ As is customary, I handed over my ID. She glanced at it—name: [something I no longer go by], sex: F—then looked back at me, clearly unsure how to reconcile the mismatch. She called over a coworker, whispering about what to do in this ‘situation.’ I stared at my phone, trying to stay calm as the coworker muttered, ‘Just check her in.’ And she did. I sat down, feeling that familiar discomfort of my presence unsettling others.

Throughout that entire doctor’s appointment, I was treated as though my body was something entirely unique—as if I were the only person who had ever transitioned. In moments like these, I try to chalk it up to ignorance, reminding myself that 71% of Americans say they’ve never met a trans person. But at what point does ‘ignorance’ become too generous?

This same scenario unfolded at the club when bouncers checked my ID, when people hesitated to call me ‘sir’ or ‘ma’am’ as they guided me to a table at restaurants, or when customer service reps asked me twice as many security questions as they did for others. And every time I needed to use the bathroom, I had to make the decision: men’s or women’s? At best, I was made uncomfortable for a few seconds. At worst, I was subjected to slurs or threats of violence. In all those moments, I told myself, ‘It’s no big deal’—as though it were no big deal for my mere existence to constantly puzzle or disturb people. The very fact of my body made others treat me as if I were a problem. I came to expect discomfort every time I stepped outside my door.

Every time I grabbed my keys, phone, and wallet, I weighed the emotional and physical risks of venturing out into the world. This constant calculation is why some trans people delay medical care or feel disconnected from the world around them. It’s also why, after two years on HRT, I finally decided to change the name and gender marker on my ID. But this was not a decision I made lightly.

Until August, changing your name and gender marker in Texas cost $350 (plus lawyer fees, unless you could prove you couldn’t afford it). You also needed a doctor’s note stating that you were ‘receiving clinically appropriate treatment related to your gender identity.’ (The pathologizing of transness is its own burden.) Once you had those documents and filled out a ‘Petition to Change the Name and Sex/Gender Identifier of an Adult’ form, you had to appear before a county judge. That judge could deny your petition for any reason—or no reason at all. It was a request, not a guarantee. In Texas, trans people often seek advice from other trans folks about which counties to target, because not all judges are inclusive. Many travel from across the state to Austin, the third-queerest city in the U.S., in hopes of a more supportive judge. Even then, judges can demand more ‘proof’ than the law requires. In a state where anyone can change their last name after marriage with minimal hurdles, trans people are forced to jump through countless hoops just to have their gender recognized.

It took a month for me to get a letter from a doctor. Another month passed before I could find time to go to the courthouse, which was only open during regular work hours—a schedule that most people can’t easily accommodate. When I finally arrived at the Travis County office, I sat for two hours waiting to be helped. A county clerk, who had warmly greeted other patrons, glanced at my petition and abruptly told me, ‘If you aren’t finished with your papers, we can’t help you.’ Despite the cold reception, I was determined to get this done—to untangle the mess of living as a visibly trans person. I handed in my request, and six weeks later, I received an email with a PDF confirming that my petition had been approved.

Afterward, I spent months updating my name and gender marker on my driver’s license, social security card, passport, and a slew of other official documents. One might ask, ‘Why would anyone willingly sign up for such a cumbersome and clearly prejudiced process?’ The answer is simple: I needed it. My body not matching the letters on my ID had become a life-threatening issue. Without the change, I’d still be trapped in the daily hell of being put in emotional and physical danger. Not all trans people feel the need to change their name and gender marker, but for me, it was crucial. Because this option was available, I’ve been able to build a new life.

The difference between my life from April 2021 to September 2022—when I didn’t ‘look like a girl’ but still had a feminine name and sex on my ID—and now is like night and day. I can hand over my ID and no longer feel like I’m putting myself in harm’s way. It says ‘Kaybee,’ Sex: M (though that still doesn’t feel right, since Texas hasn’t offered an X gender marker yet). Now, when I pass over a piece of plastic, I no longer feel like I’m outing myself or offering my life up for judgment.

In the same month that Texas reversed the right to change your name and gender marker, Trump announced he would sign an executive order banning gender-affirming care for trans youth on his first day back in office. As if it isn’t enough that Governor Greg Abbott, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, and a whole host of other Texas politicians have pushed so much misinformation about the trans community that people now feel emboldened to mistreat us. As if it’s not enough that Texas attempts to pass transphobic laws every year.

Everything about this group of people—who could never understand what it’s like to hand over an ID that doesn’t match how the world sees you—fills me with disgust. They don’t know even a fraction of what people like me go through, just to live authentically.

Yes, I still have to explain to medical providers that my legal sex and my sex assigned at birth are not the same. Yes, I still out myself every time I take off my shirt, revealing the two beautiful top surgery scars that are part of my journey. My goal was never to ‘pass’ as cis, or to meet the ridiculous expectations that transphobes project onto us. My goal has always been to be myself. Safely.

Trump’s inauguration is on January 20th, and the next Texas legislative session—the period when most anti-trans laws will be debated—starts just a week earlier, on January 14th. In preparation, Texas lawmakers have already prefiled 34 anti-trans bills for the 2025 session. Now is the time to act, to support and defend the psychological and physical safety of trans people. I will be contributing both money and volunteer hours to the Transgender Education Network of Texas. This BIPOC-led organization fights anti-LGBTQ+ laws daily, and they offer a wealth of resources on their website, including guidance on how to file discrimination complaints with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Despite the wishes of those who seek to erase us, trans people like me will be part of the future of Texas—and beyond.

I long for a Texas where trans people don’t just survive, but thrive. We deserve safety here, in the Lone Star State, and anywhere else we choose to be. I spent too much time living under an identity that wasn’t mine, but I was able to change it. Everyone else deserves the same right to do so.

How Feasible Are Trump’s Anti-LGBTQ+ Threats? We Consulted Legal Experts

This blog is originally appeared at Them

Trump has pledged to eliminate gender-affirming care for trans youth, ban trans kids from participating in sports, and erase trans people from public life. Is he actually able to carry out these promises?

As the second Trump administration starts to take form, civil rights advocates are bracing for a new wave of attacks on the LGBTQ+ community. During his first term, Trump’s White House enacted over 200 policies that harmed LGBTQ+ equality, including the ban on openly trans individuals serving in the military, cuts to HIV/AIDS funding, and the repeal of protections for trans patients seeking healthcare and trans individuals in need of emergency shelter.

Trump has made it clear that he intends to continue reversing LGBTQ+ rights once he returns to the White House in January. On his 2024 campaign website, the president-elect outlined an aggressive agenda targeting fundamental rights and protections for LGBTQ+ people. This includes a ban on gender-affirming medical care for trans youth, federal “Don’t Say Gay” policies restricting LGBTQ+ discussions in schools, a nationwide ban on trans student-athletes competing according to their gender identity, and a federal law defining gender as binary and assigned at birth—measures that would have far-reaching consequences for trans, nonbinary, and intersex Americans.

Civil rights groups say they are already bracing for the upcoming battle as Trump assembles a diverse group of anti-LGBTQ+ nominees for his Cabinet. What will bolster his administration’s power to push its far-right agenda is the GOP’s control over all three branches of government: six of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican presidents, and conservatives will hold majorities in both houses of Congress for the first time since 2016.

Them spoke with legal experts to assess how feasible Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ threats are and what strategies advocates might use to fight back. Despite the challenges ahead, Ezra Cukor, co-interim legal director of Advocates for Trans Equality, remains hopeful, believing this is merely “one chapter in a story of trans folks being a part of civil society in the United States.”

“There have been moments of joy, and there have been moments of challenge,” he tells Them. “In this moment, I’m just grateful to be part of a broader civil rights fabric, knowing that there’s a long history of trans folks insisting on our basic rights and working for our liberation and that there are many of us in this together.”

Ending Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth

In a January 2023 video posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump vowed to launch an all-out assault on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth. He called on Congress to pass a law banning “child sexual mutilation” in all 50 states and pledged to cut Medicaid and Medicare funding to any hospital providing gender-affirming care to minors. Trump also promised to instruct the Department of Justice to investigate whether medical providers had “deliberately covered up horrific long-term side effects” of transition care for youth, and he vowed to support a “private right of action” for patients who might later regret the transition treatments they received as children. (This, despite the fact that rates of transition regret are notably low.)

Civil rights groups are already preparing for the fight ahead as Trump selects a range of anti-LGBTQ+ nominees for his Cabinet. What will strengthen his administration’s ability to push its far-right agenda is the GOP’s control over all three branches of government: six of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican presidents, and conservatives will hold majorities in both houses of Congress for the first time since 2016.

Them spoke with legal experts to gauge how feasible Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ threats truly are and what actions advocates might take to resist them. Despite the significant challenges, Ezra Cukor, co-interim legal director of Advocates for Trans Equality, remains hopeful, viewing this moment as “one chapter in a story of trans folks being a part of civil society in the United States.”

“There have been moments of joy, and there have been moments of challenge,” Cukor tells Them. “In this moment, I’m just grateful to be part of a broader civil rights fabric, knowing that there’s a long history of trans folks insisting on our basic rights and working for our liberation, and that there are many of us in this together.”

Ending Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth

In a January 2023 video posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump promised to launch a full-scale assault on gender-affirming healthcare for trans youth. He called on Congress to pass a law banning “child sexual mutilation” across all 50 states and vowed to eliminate Medicaid and Medicare funding for hospitals providing gender-affirming care to minors. Trump also pledged to direct the Department of Justice to investigate whether medical providers had “deliberately covered up horrific long-term side effects” of transition care for youth, and he expressed support for a “private right of action” for patients who might later regret their transition treatments. (This, despite the fact that regret rates for transition treatments are extremely low.)

Sasha Buchert, a senior attorney with Lambda Legal, argues that the push for a national trans sports ban exposes the hypocrisy of Republicans’ long-standing stance that LGBTQ+ educational policies should be decided at the state and local level. “Once the far right gets in power, suddenly they feel like they should be imposing their beliefs on the rest of the country,” Buchert tells Them, pointing to the 26 state attorneys general who opposed the Biden administration’s interpretation that Title IX protects trans students from discrimination. “These issues aren’t in isolation. They’re part of a widespread onslaught of attacks targeting the trans community and specifically trans youth.”

Given the potential for a filibuster, Buchert predicts Trump will not wait for Congress to act, instead seeking “immediate gratification” to appease his base. She expects him to issue an executive order that would bar trans students from protection under Title IX, echoing the early days of his first term, when his Department of Education repealed Obama-era guidance that required schools to treat trans students in accordance with their gender identity.

Buchert vowed that Lambda Legal would challenge such an order in court, pointing out that courts have consistently ruled against targeted sports bans, which they view as discriminatory toward trans athletes. Anti-trans sports laws in Arizona and Idaho have been blocked by the courts for now, while the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked West Virginia from preventing a trans student, Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 14-year-old middle school runner, from competing. (West Virginia intends to appeal that ruling to the Supreme Court.)

“The federal courts have agreed that it really does deprive [trans student athletes] and harm them by not allowing them to participate,” Buchert says. “The argument that they can still play on a boys’ team or intramural team doesn’t hold any water. The courts have seen right through that. It’s like saying before marriage equality: ‘You can still get married. You just can’t get married to somebody of the same gender.’”

Enacting National “Don’t Say Gay” Policies

Trump has also pledged to implement broader policies targeting LGBTQ+ students in schools, including “Don’t Say Gay”-style restrictions in the classroom and regulations that would force teachers to out trans students to their parents. His 2024 platform promises to “protect the rights of parents from being forced to allow their minor child to assume a gender” without their consent, frequently repeating false claims that schools are transitioning children without their families’ knowledge. “Can you imagine you’re a parent and your son leaves the house and you say, ‘Jimmy, I love you so much. Go have a good day in school,’ and your son comes back with a brutal operation?” Trump asked at a Wisconsin rally. “Can you even imagine this? What the hell is wrong with our country?”

Should Trump push his proposed policies through Department of Education regulations or an executive order, Chris Erchull, a staff attorney with the LGBTQ+ advocacy group GLAD, believes the legal system will stand with queer students. He points out that courts have long held that all students are “entitled to a full education.” “You go all the way back to the promise of Brown v. Board of Education, which said that separate education is not equal education,” he tells Them, referencing the landmark 1954 Supreme Court ruling that desegregated schools by race. “Those principles apply when we’re talking about the rights of LGBTQ+ students today. For students to get a complete education, they need to see themselves represented. You can’t suppress their identities in the classroom, or you’ll be depriving them of that.”

Erchull also notes that in the past year, advocates have won several key victories in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ restrictions in schools. In March, Florida settled a lawsuit that rolled back parts of its “Don’t Say Gay” law, narrowing the scope of the state’s regulations. The law was so broadly worded that school districts, fearing lawsuits for noncompliance, had applied it to nearly all aspects of campus life, including student clubs like Gender-Sexuality Alliances. Just two months later, a New Hampshire district court ruled that an anti-LGBTQ+ law restricting classroom discussions in the state was “unconstitutionally vague.”

“Those are really powerful examples of how the courts can step up and be a voice of reason amidst attempts to undermine public education,” Erchull says. “There’s this zero-sum thinking where, if LGBTQ+ students are represented and seen, that’s depriving other people of something, and that’s not true at all. What research shows is that inclusive and supportive school environments benefit all students.”

Federal Law Erasing Trans People

Trump’s campaign website promises that, if re-elected, he will push Congress to pass a law defining gender as strictly male and female, assigned at birth. This pledge echoes a policy from his first presidency, when the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) attempted to narrow the federal definition of gender to “immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth.” A 2018 memo reportedly circulated within HHS stated that “the sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.”

Passing a federal bill through Congress to define trans people out of existence would be unprecedented, requiring support from both houses to succeed. Sarah Warbelow, legal director at the Human Rights Campaign, notes that LGBTQ+ advocates have already seen the potential impact of such policies through laws enacted at the state level. In May 2023, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte (R) signed a law redefining sex as strictly male or female in portions of the state code. While that statute was struck down by a district court earlier this year, Kansas and Tennessee still have similar mandates in place.

Warbelow emphasizes that these types of restrictions have far-reaching consequences on trans people’s daily lives, impacting their ability to obtain identity documents and access spaces that align with their identities. However, she also points out that the full implications of such laws are unclear. After Kansas passed its 2023 law redefining gender, Attorney General Kris Kobach (R) claimed that schools were required to out trans students to their parents, even though the law did not explicitly state this. Warbelow notes that “there are huge unknowns” about how a federal law erasing trans identities would be interpreted or applied, whether by the courts, individual states, or schools.

“It becomes unclear how it would be operationalized,” she tells Them. “To the extent that it is interpreted broadly, it could have ramifications for non-discrimination laws. In Bostock, the Supreme Court interpreted the term ‘sex’ to be broadly understood as including LGBTQ+ people in the context of non-discrimination laws, so it could potentially eliminate those legal protections for LGBTQ+ people in the future.”

That’s why Warbelow says that the Human Rights Campaign, as the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ organization, is exploring “every option” to counter Trump’s anti-trans agenda. She adds that if litigation becomes necessary, the organization will likely invoke constitutional protections related to free speech, equal protection under the law, and due process to challenge a federal redefinition of gender. “We know it’s going to be incredibly tough work, but we have no choice but to fight,” she asserts. “We’ve got to throw our all at preserving democracy and the rights of LGBTQ+ people.”

Georgia could shift away from a GOP stronghold, and these LGBTQ+ advocates are driving the change

This blog is originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation

In Georgia, where Republicans hold a trifecta with control of the governorship and both chambers of the state legislature, LGBTQ+ community leaders and political strategists are working hard to show that progressive values extend beyond Atlanta.

With about 8 million registered voters in the state, Georgia’s Secretary of State reports an increase of 121,898 active voters since the December 2022 runoff election, a critical number in a battleground state that could shape the nation’s future.

In September, the Georgia State Election Board decided that all ballots would be hand-counted, a move many see as an effort to delay or disrupt the election process. Democrats, who previously urged Gov. Brian Kemp (R) to hold an ethics hearing, filed a lawsuit to remove members of the elections board believed to be loyal to former President Donald Trump. While a judge dismissed the case in early October, a Fulton County Superior Court judge issued an injunction blocking the hand-counting rule on the first day of early voting, citing concerns over the rule’s timing and the potential for “administrative chaos.”

Georgia’s status as a battleground state has gained significant attention in recent years. Stacey Abrams’ 2018 gubernatorial campaign was seen as a test to prove that a sustained voter outreach effort by Democrats could turn the state from red to blue. In the 2020 election, Joe Biden narrowly defeated Donald Trump by 11,779 votes, securing Georgia’s Electoral College votes and reinforcing its potential influence on the national stage. This momentum was further solidified in 2022 when Sen. Raphael Warnock won his runoff against Republican Herschel Walker, affirming Georgia’s role as a true swing state.

A key factor in this shift has been the dedication of LGBTQ+ community leaders and political strategists. They have mobilized voters from diverse backgrounds across the state, proving that political power extends beyond Atlanta. Through grassroots organizing and voter engagement, they’ve built coalitions that reflect the growing diversity and progressive energy in Georgia, demonstrating their significant influence in shaping the state’s political landscape.

Georgians are championing people over politics.

At just 28 years old, Mo Pippin (they/them) is one Georgian determined to shift the state from purple to blue. In 2023, they co-founded FTR Political Strategies to enhance local election engagement and voter education.

“Here in Roswell, which is just a stone’s throw from Athens, we’re working to simplify large, often daunting federal issues into local and state matters that are relatable and relevant to people,” Pippin shared with LGBTQ Nation. “We aim to connect voters with better representatives. I firmly believe that young people are ready to engage in conversations with those who are different from us. One of our main strategies for engaging voters is canvassing—we knock on doors.”

Pippin noted that some voters have cautioned them to be cautious while canvassing in traditionally conservative areas of Roswell, suggesting that the assumption is rooted in a belief that local residents might not be welcoming and could even be hostile.

“When I look at our state government and don’t see anyone who resembles me or shares my values, it’s easy to assume that those elected through popular vote naturally represent our entire population. But that’s not true,” they explained. “Voter turnout in the state is alarmingly low due to various structural barriers. People are often overwhelmed with responsibilities like getting their kids to school, commuting to work, and ensuring their families are fed and healthy. Many simply don’t have the time or energy to engage in the political process.”

Organizations like Georgia Equality, the state’s largest and oldest LGBTQ+ advocacy group, are actively engaging, educating, and advocating for the community. Over the past year, they played a crucial role in defeating nearly 20 anti-LGBTQ+ bills introduced in the state legislature by regularly attending hearings, votes, and meetings at the state Capitol alongside other pro-LGBTQ+ organizations. The group also mobilized the community, organizing over 5,000 individuals to call their representatives during the legislative session.

“Our priority is to ensure that no LGBTQ+ Georgian is left behind,” said Noël Heatherland (they/them), statewide organizing manager for Georgia Equality, in an interview with LGBTQ Nation. “We strive to remember and include everyone, especially those who don’t live in the Atlanta bubble, particularly during a time when civic engagement and making our voices heard is crucial.”

Heatherland, a native of Albany, Georgia, noted that the queer experience in the state’s southern region presents unique challenges and concerns. While recent reports indicate that many LGBTQ+ voters are motivated to support the Democratic Party due to issues like restrictions on women’s rights and bans on medical care for transgender youth, they are also focused on a range of issues affecting various communities.

Omarion Smart, a senior at Georgia State University and a native of Bainbridge, Georgia, shares this perspective. As the policy director for Voters of Tomorrow, a social welfare organization created for Gen Z by Gen Z, he emphasizes that housing, food security, and the cost of living are top priorities for queer voters heading to the polls this November. Heatherland adds that queer voters in Georgia are also concerned about providing quality education for their children and ensuring their safety in schools. According to the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, the LGBTQ+ population in Georgia constitutes about 4.7% of the state’s total population, with 27% of them being parents.

“The majority of Georgians share common ground on these issues,” Smart stated. “We all believe that housing should be affordable, that we deserve access to healthcare, and that Medicare and Medicaid should be expanded. Concerns about the economy, housing, the rise of anti-transgender rhetoric, and reproductive rights are all critical issues for voters in Georgia. No single issue takes precedence over the others. Yet, we have legislators who don’t represent the diverse population of our state, and it’s time for that to change.”

Smart’s concerns came to the forefront this August when Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones (R) established the Georgia Senate Special Committee on the Protection of Women’s Sports, claiming it aims to ensure that female athletes in Georgia can compete fairly. Smart views this committee and its objectives as “disgusting.”

“It’s clear that this committee isn’t meant to genuinely address these issues,” Smart remarked. “That’s just the nature of politics in our state. Their true goal is to spread their blatant hatred without facing accountability for it.”

“The majority of Georgians share common ground on these issues,” Smart stated. “We all believe that housing should be affordable, that we deserve access to healthcare, and that Medicare and Medicaid should be expanded. Concerns about the economy, housing, the rise of anti-transgender rhetoric, and reproductive rights are all critical issues for voters in Georgia. No single issue takes precedence over the others. Yet, we have legislators who don’t represent the diverse population of our state, and it’s time for that to change.”

Smart’s concerns came to the forefront this August when Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones (R) established the Georgia Senate Special Committee on the Protection of Women’s Sports, claiming it aims to ensure that female athletes in Georgia can compete fairly. Smart views this committee and its objectives as “disgusting.”

“It’s clear that this committee isn’t meant to genuinely address these issues,” Smart remarked. “That’s just the nature of politics in our state. Their true goal is to spread their blatant hatred without facing accountability for it.”

“The Cobb County school system has been enacting numerous book bans and implementing discriminatory policies,” strategist Pippin noted. “If she wins, control of the Cobb Board of Education would shift, putting a stop to the madness occurring there. Her district is highly competitive, and I’m fully supporting her.”

One candidate with a personal stake in the matter is JD Jordan, who is running against John Albers for Georgia Senate District 56.

“He is fighting to protect his children from harmful state policies. The incumbent is a co-sponsor of anti-trans legislation that jeopardizes healthcare access for JD’s kids,” Pippin explained. “He has five children aged 14 to 19, two of whom identify as transgender.”

Georgia Equality’s Heatherland emphasized that Albers is not friendly toward LGBTQ+ individuals or their allies and is unwilling to listen to them when they come to the Capitol to discuss issues—even if they are his constituents. The district is currently being viewed as one of the most “flippable” in the state.

“It’s one thing to advocate for LGBTQ+ children and, specifically, transgender individuals when you’re campaigning in Atlanta, where about 85% of your audience agrees with you,” Pippin added. “It’s a completely different challenge to do that in a district as red as SD56. JD is bravely fighting that battle and working to dispel the misinformation directed at the queer community. He embodies the supportive father figure many of us in the community wished we had while growing up.”

Russia enlisted anti-LGBTQ+ right-wing groups to spread propaganda targeting U.S. audiences

This blog originally appeared at LGBT Nation.

The Department of Justice disclosed that Tenet Media was primarily funded by Russian state media and frequently gives a platform to anti-LGBTQ+ broadcasters. N

According to a Department of Justice (DOJ) indictment, several anti-LGBTQ+ right-wing broadcasters, including Tim Pool and Dave Rubin (who is gay), have unknowingly worked for a Russian government-funded media company designed to spread propaganda and disinformation to U.S. audiences. While there is no evidence suggesting the broadcasters were aware of the company’s Russian ties, unsealed court documents revealed that Russia supports former President Donald Trump in the 2024 election, as reported by The Hill.

The FBI is now investigating the case, drawing parallels to Russian “troll farms” that spread anti-Democratic content during the 2016 and 2020 elections. In response, the Biden administration confirmed ongoing Russian efforts to influence the 2024 election, and the DOJ seized 32 web domains used by Russia to propagate its messaging in the U.S.

The DOJ indictment claims that two employees of RT (formerly Russia Today), a Russian state-controlled media outlet, secretly funneled nearly $10 million over the past year to fund and manage Tenet Media, a Tennessee-based online content creation company. This company, which platforms the aforementioned broadcasters, has produced over 2,000 videos in the past 10 months on TikTok, Instagram, X, and YouTube. These videos have garnered more than 20 million views collectively, according to the DOJ.

Although the indictment doesn’t explicitly name Tenet Media, referring to it only as “U.S. Company 1,” it does describe the company as a “network of heterodox commentators that focus on Western political and cultural issues.” This description aligns with the one Tenet Media uses on its YouTube channel, as noted by New York Times reporter Aric Toler.

The RT employees, Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva, operated under the aliases Helena Shudra and Victoria Pesti, managing the funding, hiring, and content editing for the company.

Tenet Media’s YouTube channel features several anti-LGBTQ+ videos, including titles like “Fellas, Is It Gay To Date A Trans Woman?”, “The TRUTH About Gender Ideology,” videos claiming Pride parades expose children to nudity, and another falsely accusing the drag queen segment of the Olympic Opening Ceremonies of “mocking Christianity.” The segment’s artistic director clarified it depicted a Dionysian feast.

In alignment with this rhetoric, Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused the U.S. of imposing gender “perversions” on Russian schoolchildren, using this as a pretext for anti-LGBTQ+ policies and his continued invasion of Ukraine. Tenet Media has also published videos criticizing Ukraine, claiming it spreads violence and unrest in Russia.

The DOJ stated, “While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, most are aligned with the publicly stated goals of the Government of Russia and RT — to deepen domestic divisions within the United States.”

Tenet Media’s website lists prominent figures like Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Tayler Hansen, and Turning Point USA’s chief creative officer Benny Johnson — all of whom have expressed anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments on social media. The platform has also hosted discussions between former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and conservative gay commentator Glenn Greenwald.

On Wednesday, the Biden administration revealed that Russian government agents had been operating websites, social media platforms, and creating fake social media personas to push propaganda that supports Russian interests. According to The Verge, the DOJ announced it had already seized 32 web domains connected to this Russian scheme and indicated that more seizures are likely as the investigation continues.

Numerous media studies have demonstrated that Russian government-funded “troll farms” spread state propaganda aimed at deepening political divisions in the U.S. during the 2016 and 2020 elections. The exposure of Tenet Media represents the latest version of this tactic, with Russian agents seemingly using anti-LGBTQ+ media figures as part of their broader anti-American disinformation campaign.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑