Hungarian MPs scrap Orbán’s anti-LGBTQ measures

Read more at BBC.

The Hungarian parliament has voted to amend child protection laws, scrapping measures that stigmatise gay and transgender people. LGBTQ and human rights activists warmly welcomed the move, but called for changes to other Orbán-era laws.

The 2021 Child Protection Law, passed by the large Fidesz majority of then-Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, banned the “portrayal or promotion of homosexuality or transgenderism”.

Since Orbán’s April election defeat, the Tisza government of Péter Magyar has been working to dismantle the previous government’s legacy.

Minutes after Tuesday’s vote, Budapest said the EU had agreed to release €4.2bn (£3.5bn) of funds frozen in the last years of the Fidesz government.

The European Commission said last month that the Magyar government had addressed a number of “rule of law breaches affecting the EU budget”, and urged EU leaders to unlock the funds and readmit Hungary to two key EU programmes – Erasmus+ and Horizon Europe.

Hungary’s 2021 law had affected a wide range of other laws, including education and the right of assembly.

Magyar’s Tisza party commands the same two-thirds majority that Orbán’s party used to have, and the measures passed on Tuesday were bundled together by the new government in a package of laws designed to unravel the Fidesz legislation.

“We are very happy that this got adopted,” Tamás Dombos of civil rights group the Háttér Society told the BBC. “We’ve been fighting this so-called child protection law for five years. There have been problems with the bill submitted to parliament, but most of those problems have been fixed.”

Both the Fidesz and Tisza governments made child protection central to their image.

But while Fidesz under Viktor Orbán appealed to the conservative electorate by identifying gay and transgender people as a threat to public morals, Tisza under Prime Minister Péter Magyar is trying to remove or soften legislation, without actually identifying as a liberal-minded government in favour of full equality.

In June 2025, the Gay Pride march through Budapest drew an estimated quarter of a million people, despite a promise by then-Prime Minister Viktor Orbán to his supporters that he would prevent it happening.

Police stood aside despite an official ban, and proceedings against the city mayor and others for organising the festival were later dropped. This year’s event went ahead without restrictions.

The child protection issue turned from being a strong card in Orbán’s hand to become his Achilles heel, when the public found out that his government had supported the pardon of the deputy head of a children’s home who had been found guilty of covering up the paedophile crimes of his boss.

In his own election campaign, Péter Magyar presented his party as a champion of the rights of children in state care, while painstakingly avoiding the issues of gay and transgender rights, for fear of alienating right-wing voters.

“We are still knocking on a closed door,” Dombos told the BBC, “but at least they are listening on the other side.”

This marked a major improvement on the Orbán years, he said, where his community felt constantly targeted. Other issues he wanted addressed include the full recognition of same-sex marriage, same-sex couples’ rights to adopt children, and the restoration of the right of transgender people to change their names in official documents.

“I’m very cautious,” Magyar said in an interview published in Finnish daily Helsingin Sanomat on Saturday. “As prime minister, it’s my duty to represent all Hungarians, and we have sensitive issues, such as the situation of sexual minorities.”

Fidesz and its sister party, the Christian Democrats, voted against the new amendments to the law on Tuesday.

“There is no place for the promotion of LGBTQ content in schools or the media,” the Christian Democrats said in a statement on their website.

Report: Trump Admin Is Deporting LGBTQ Asylum Seekers to Hostile Third Countries

Read more at Truthout.

The Trump administration has reportedly deported dozens of LGBTQ immigrants who sought or were granted asylum for their sexuality and gender to third countries where they face danger of persecution and criminalization, a new report says.

In an investigation published this week, Reuters identified 40 cases where these LGBTQ individuals were sent to countries that either criminalize same-sex relations or have been designated by the State Department as dangerous for LGBTQ people.

All of these people were granted legal protection in the U.S. for fleeing persecution for their LGBTQ status in their countries of origin, per Reuters. However, more than half of them were ineligible for asylum because of a restrictive Biden-era transit ban on asylum seekers.

Individuals tracked in the report have been deported to countries including Sierra Leone, Cameroon and Eswatini, three countries where same-sex acts are criminalized. In Sierra Leone, same sex acts carry a punishment of up to life in prison. Other countries that have signed deportation agreements with the U.S. have seen abuses against LGBTQ people like conversion therapy and “corrective rape,” the report notes.

The Trump administration has signed third country deportation agreements with at least 35 countries, and has deported over 25,000 people this way, sending them to places that they have no affiliation with. Many governments in Africa and central and South America have signed agreements to receive such deportees, often in exchange for direct funding or other financial incentives.

Gavin Newsom signs 6 pro-LGBTQ+ bills in California in response to Trump’s “all-out assault” on the community

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed six pro-LGBTQ+ bills into law on Saturday, some of which were crafted as a direct response to the Trump administration’s relentless attacks on the community.

“The Trump administration has launched an all-out assault on the LGBTQ community, using medical records to target U.S. servicemembers and civilians alike, hurting countless people and betraying hard-won trust,” Newsom said in a statement on the bill package. “California will not stand for it.”

One bill, AB 1930, seeks to protect trans Californians’ medical records by barring state or local agencies from “cooperating with or providing information to an individual or agency from another state or a federal law enforcement agency… regarding a legally protected health care activity that is lawful in this state and performed in this state.”

The bill requires any agency that receives a subpoena, discovery request, or similar request to report it to the attorney general, who will assess whether the request meets certain requirements before deciding whether the information can be provided.

One such requirement is that “the requested information is related to an investigation or proceeding regarding activity that is unlawful under California civil or criminal law, and it identifies the California law under which the activity is unlawful.” The bill also protects the medical information of folks who have terminated a pregnancy.

The law is a response to the Trump administration’s efforts to intimidate hospitals across the country into ending gender-affirming care services for trans youth. The administration has subpoenaed the private medical records of trans youth from more than 20 hospitals in hopes of using them to prosecute health care providers, even in states that don’t ban gender-affirming care for trans youth. In some cases, judges have rejected the administration’s attempts. In others, hospitals have agreed to shutter their programs in response or have even complied with providing the records.

The other bills ban conversion therapy for minors; strengthen protections and resources for LGBTQ+ college students; limit out-of-state entities from accessing state data on LGBTQ+ people; reduce hurdles for insurance companies to cover HIV prevention medication; and, in response to the administration’s trans miliary ban, help military veterans who “received a discharge solely as a result of a specified executive order” to upgrade to an honorable discharge and prioritize those “who are able to demonstrate their less than honorable characterization of service was connected to a mental health condition, traumatic brain injury, sexual assault or harassment, or sexual orientation or… gender identity.”

Last week, Newsom vetoed a bill that would have prevented California from extraditing patients or providers as part of another state’s investigations into gender-affirming or reproductive care, explaining that it would “prohibit future governors from recognizing a request for extradition of a person subject to criminal liability based on allegations that the person engaged in specified healthcare activities.”

He acknowledged the importance of the bill’s goals and emphasized he does “share the author’s views on the importance of protecting these important healthcare services,” but also said that “extradition is an exclusively executive function” and he felt “troubled by the precedent that would be set if an outgoing administration agreed with the Legislature to erode the executive authority of an incoming Governor based on their shared policy preferences, regardless of how righteous and well-intended those actions may be.”

Newsom has a shaky track record when it comes to trans rights. While he has supported trans rights and signed positive bills protecting trans people, he has also agreed with slain MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk that trans inclusion in sports is unfair. Last year, he vetoed a bill that would have funded gender-affirming care.

Last year, trans journalist Erin Reed wrote that “transgender people are not feeling Gavin Newsom” because his office reportedly pressured state lawmakers not to pursue pro-trans legislation.

“This caution came precisely as red states were escalating their crackdowns, enacting increasingly hostile laws,” Reed wrote. “California could have served as a bulwark—a safe ground—but instead, Newsom hit the brakes.”

In other comments highlighted by Reed, Newsom said he’s “trying to understand as … the whole ‘pronoun’ thing,” and suggested that 25 might be too young for someone to transition.

NC Governor Stein Proclaims LGBTQ Veterans Day

From the Office of the Governor

LGBTQ Veterans Day

2026

By The Governor Of The State Of North Carolina

A Proclamation

Whereas, North Carolina is home to a proud and diverse community of veterans, service members, military families, and civilians who contribute to the strength, security, and civic life of the state and nation; and

Whereas, LGBTQ North Carolinians are part of the state’s military, veteran, and civic communities and have served the United States Armed Forces in every generation; and

Whereas, LGBTQ veterans and service members have contributed to the defense, resilience, and prosperity of the United States through their courage, sacrifice, professionalism, and commitment to duty; and

Whereas, September 20 marks the anniversary of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” an important milestone in the history of military service and public life in the United States; and

Whereas, recognizing LGBTQ veterans affirms the dignity of service, honors the contributions of all who have worn the uniform, and strengthens the bonds of community, belonging, and civic trust; and

Whereas, North Carolina recognizes the importance of honoring military veterans from all backgrounds and celebrating the many ways veterans continue to serve their families, communities, and state;

Now, Therefore, I, Josh Stein, Governor of the State of North Carolina, do hereby proclaim September 20, 2026, as “LGBTQ Veterans Day” in North Carolina and commend its observance.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina at the Capitol in Raleigh this eighth day of September in the year of our Lord two thousand and twenty-sixth and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.

WA governor takes stand against parental rights initiative

Read more at Washington State Standard.

Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson has officially come out against a conservative-backed initiative to rewrite the state’s so-called “parents bill of rights” law.

“It’s my strong sense that many Washingtonians aren’t aware of some of the facts around this initiative,” Ferguson said at a press conference Thursday morning.

He joined other Democrats and pro-LGBTQ campaigners to speak out against Ballot Initiative 001, which asks voters to roll back changes the state Legislature made to the law last year. Those changes give schools more time to turn over materials like classroom curricula and other records to parents who request them, and keeps student’s medical and mental health records private.

Campaigners who want to keep those changes say they’re meant to protect LGBTQ youth from abuse. Supporters of the initiative say it will strengthen communications between schools and parents.

“Teachers, counselors, school leaders all know that partnering with parents is crucial, and the rhetoric from this initiative is politically charged,” said state Rep. Monica Stonier (D-Vancouver), who was one of the lead sponsors of the changes made to the “parents bill of rights” last year. “Let’s Go Washington’s focus on demonizing schools hasn’t changed, but this time it’s resulted in a law that is so badly written that it takes away some of those parental rights.”

Conservative political action committee Let’s Go Washington and its founder Brian Heywood are behind the initiative to roll back the law.

“ I think that parents are first the primary stakeholders in raising their kids. That’s number one. And this seeks to restore that,” Heywood said. “There is this responsibility that’s given to schools and to teachers to watch over and and educate our kids during the day, and to have a side that’s excluding parents from that process by keeping secrets from them destroys the very trust that is required to do what’s in the best interest of the child.”

Heywood was also responsible for bringing an earlier version of this law before the legislature in 2024. Lawmakers passed that version and amended it last year. The original 2024 version said parents should get copies of their children’s school records within 10 days of requesting them; subsequent changes allowed for more time.

The Seattle Times editorial board recently noted that Heywood’s new initiative lifts language directly from an existing law in Louisiana and called out a section on reporting abuse in schools. Washington’s current law requires that parents be notified of abuse at school as soon as a report is filed, but the initiative proposes vague wording that recommends notifying a parent as soon as criminal action is “deemed to have been committed.”

“I’m speaking partly as a governor, of course, but also as a father of two teenagers who cares deeply about protecting parents’ rights,” Ferguson said. “Initiative 001 — no matter how hard the other side tries to spin it — it actually weakens existing laws by removing parents’ rights.”

Let’s Go Washington argues that its initiative would give parents more control over their children’s records, saying that the new wording “expressly gives parents the right to receive immediate notification if a criminal action is deemed to have been committed against their child or by their child.” The group says that parents would receive information more quickly with their initiative’s rewrite. Heywood himself has said that he believes the opposition is “splitting hairs” on the wording.

”If I’m a school administrator and I realize something’s happened to a kid, I’m calling a parent, right? That’s what my law allows them to do,” he said.

LGBTQ activists have also argued that this initiative could “out” students to their parents before they wish, which could lead to dangerous situations at home.

“In middle school, I lived alone with my mother, who subjected me to physical abuse and neglect due to mental health issues and alcohol abuse. I felt alone, struggled academically, and did not know where to run for support,” Gabriel Neuman, an LGBTQ advocate and transgender man, said, adding that he worried that the new initiative could put hundreds of students at higher risk for abuse at home. “I opened up the moment the school counselor assured me that our meetings were confidential.”

Let’s Go Washington has said their initiative does not require a school to notify a parent if their child is LGBTQ+ or transgender. But the initiative does expand parental access to records if a child is receiving medical care, and it will allow parents to access students’ mental health records. It could also allow for parents to see more information regarding a student’s gender identity.

If voters pass the initiative this fall, the state Legislature would have to wait two years before it could amend the new law in any way.

A Texas city denied a permit to a church Pride event & didn’t say why.

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

The city council of Southlake, Texas — one of the wealthiest cities in the US — voted unanimously on Tuesday night to deny a permit to Pride So-Kel, a community Pride festival planned for October 3 on the 10-acre property of St. Martin-in-the-Field, an Episcopal church.

While one person at the council meeting reportedly opposed the festival, council members didn’t discuss the event or ask any questions of city staff or organizers before voting to deny the event permit, The Dallas Morning News reported. Neither Southlake Mayor Shawn McCaskill nor city council members responded to the publication’s request for an explanation; a city spokesperson said they didn’t know why the council denied the permit.

The Pride event was held on the church’s property last year. It featured food trucks, vendors, performances by Dallas’ Oak Lawn Band, a B-52s cover band called “Bikini Whales,” and a drag queen singing songs about the difficulties of growing up trans in Texas’ rural city of Odessa.

Around the time of last year’s event, the then-mayor of the neighboring city of Keller, Armin Mizani, said his municipality didn’t condone the festival. The 2025 event itself was protested by a street preacher with a bullhorn asking “graphic questions about gay sex,” the aforementioned publication noted, as well as activists with the Texas Coalition for Kids, an anti-LGBTQ+ organization that purports to defend children from “the woke left.”

Last year’s event, however, didn’t require a city permit because its attendance was estimated at fewer than 1,000 people. Public events in Southlake with more than 1,000 people legally require a permit.

April Dreyson, who founded the Pride event, said she began the event with her wife to show gay and transgender people living in suburban Tarrant County that they are not alone. “We wanted to create a space where everyone could feel safe and loved. LGBTQ people have become a point of political fodder. Our existence is not political,” she said.

Rev. Alan Bentrup, who leads the church, offered to host the event since Dreyson doubted whether she could get a local city to permit the event.

Dreyson said she’s still exploring other options in hopes of hosting the event. “It’s not going to be that easy to make us go away,” she said.

Southlake’s school board recently approved policies banning trans-inclusive policies regarding pronouns and restroom use in local schools.

The December after last year’s event, the city of Keller rescinded its invitation for Bentrup to lead an opening prayer before its city council meeting. The city’s mayor said leading the prayer “is a privilege, not a right” and added that his city wouldn’t “elevate an individual who offended a large majority of our residents.”

Turkish authorities launch crackdown on LGBTQ+ and HIV support groups

Read more at AP News.

 Turkish authorities cracked down on multiple LGBTQ+ groups and individuals early Sunday morning, detaining dozens of members, breaking into association offices and raiding popular hangouts.

In an escalation of its decade-long hostility toward LGBTQ+ groups, particularly in the lead-up to elections, simultaneous police raids beginning at 1 a.m. took place in the major cities of Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, Aydin and Mersin.

Justice Minister Akin Gurlek announced on social media that the investigation into 162 suspects, nine associations and 13 businesses was to “protect children, the institution of the family, and public order” in line with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s 10-year executive order relating to families and children.

“As per the duty to protect families and children given to the state by the constitution, no criminal organization, abuse network or illegal activity which targets children, youths or families will be tolerated!” Gurlek said.

The raids targeted both current and former members of multiple prominent LGBTQ+ rights and HIV awareness groups. The organizations’ websites were also blocked.

Gurlek also noted that such associations were found to receive significant funding from international sources and agencies.

The Human Rights Association condemned the raids. “This is not a judicial investigation; it is a political operation aimed at forcing society into a monolithic family model and purging LGBTI+ and independent civil society under the guise of protecting the family and children,” it said.

“To include unrelated charges such as ‘forming a criminal organization,’ ‘drugs,’ ‘prostitution’ and ‘obscenity’ serves not to reveal the truth but to incriminate the entire community.”

The religious conservative Justice and Development Party has been increasingly vocal against LGBTQ+ groups to play up to the more conservative elements of its base. In 2015, it banned Istanbul Pride, which had tens of thousands of attendees in previous years prior. Since then, authorities have violently dispersed any attempted gatherings for Pride.

This summer, an LGBTQ+ cruise ship that tours the Mediterranean and has docked in Turkey multiple times in the past was refused permission to dock there.

The Ottoman Empire, predecessor to the modern republic of Turkey, decriminalized homosexuality in 1858, however there is still significant social discrimination.

NC’s newest bathroom battle is stoking worries about LGBTQ student harassment

Read more at Charlotte Observer.

Transgender students are absorbing the consequences of a growing fight in Cabarrus County Schools, where two federal lawsuits and a Trump administration investigation are challenging how the district handles bathroom access, LGBTQ advocates say. For months, parents, elected officials and community members clashed over whether transgender students should be allowed to use bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity. But advocates say another question has received less attention: What does the fight mean for LGBTQ students going to school every day?

“When I think about a trans girl going into a girl’s restroom, I worry about her harassment, not what she will do to other young people,” said Sarah Mikhail, CEO of Time Out Youth. Time Out Youth serves LGBTQ young people ages 13 to 24 in Charlotte and surrounding communities. Within the organization, young people regularly talk about the broader social climate surrounding bathrooms, sports and LGBTQ issues in schools, she said. Mikhail said the effect shows up in basic routines. Some young people Time Out Youth works with avoid school bathrooms entirely because they do not feel safe using them. She said that kind of vigilance does not stay confined to the restroom. Students who are constantly calculating where they can go, who might be watching them or whether an adult will support them can have a harder time concentrating, asking for help or feeling comfortable enough to learn. “We have young people that do not go to the bathroom all day at school,” Mikhail said. “This is not uncommonly reported.”

LGBTQ students not only face school rules, they also hear messages from politicians, social media, family members and community leaders about what gender means and what transgender people should be allowed to do. For some students, those messages arrive before they even figure out how they identify or whether they feel safe coming out. That uncertainty, she said, can impact whether students feel comfortable telling a teacher they had a hard night, asking for help on an assignment or using the name and pronouns that feel right to them. “You need to feel emotionally okay to share and be yourself at school,” Mikhail said. “So then you can be open to learning.” How Cabarrus became a legal battleground Cabarrus County Schools does not have a separate policy governing transgender students’ bathroom access. School board attorney William Isenhour has said the district handles the relatively rare situations on a case-by-case basis while attempting to comply with federal law.

The district has repeatedly pointed to a 2020 Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board. In that case, the court ruled a Virginia school board violated Title IX and constitutional protections when it required a transgender boy to use bathrooms based on his sex assigned at birth or use a private restroom. Because the Fourth Circuit includes North Carolina, Cabarrus officials have said the ruling binds the district. The Trump administration now takes a different view. The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights opened a Title IX investigation into Cabarrus in June after complaints that the district allowed transgender students to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms. Federal officials said the administration interprets Title IX based on biological sex and is investigating whether the district violated the privacy and safety rights of female students. On July 31, three anonymous 17-year-old Cox Mill High School students and their parents sued the district. Represented by the conservative legal organization America First Legal, they argue transgender students should not be permitted to use multi-person bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding with their gender identity.

A second lawsuit followed one week later. Cabarrus father Brandon Matthews sued after school officials declined to promise they would notify him if transgender students were permitted to use the same sex-segregated bathrooms or locker rooms as his children. He argues parents have a constitutional and religious right to receive that information and request another arrangement. The Cabarrus controversy comes as transgender rights have become a major national political talking point, with fights over girls’ sports, bathroom access and school policies playing out in courts and school board meetings. ‘Stop arguing about bathrooms’ Rebecca Herrick, a mother of three Cabarrus County Schools students, said she sees the bathroom fight as a distraction from other issues in the district. Her own children have thrived socially in CCS, Herrick said, and she wants transgender students to be treated the same. She said the controversy pulls energy away from issues that affect students more, including the district’s ongoing financial and operational challenges.

“It is time to stop arguing about bathrooms,” Herrick said. “By shifting the conversation to social issues, they are successfully diverting public energy.” Herrick said she worries that it sends a message about who belongs in school when adults devote so much attention to policing which bathrooms students use. She said the repeated lawsuits and public fights over bathrooms risk turning transgender students themselves into the subject of controversy. “These bathroom bills and the resulting lawsuits create a climate of fear and exclusion that treats transgender students as problems rather than children who deserve support,” Herrick said. ‘They’re just kids’ Joshua Jernigan said he is already hearing that fear from families. Jernigan founded the Gender Education Network, which works with transgender and gender-diverse children age 12 and younger and their families across North and South Carolina.

Jernigan said his organization has heard directly from families since the lawsuits and federal investigation intensified attention on the district. Some have reached out worried about what the legal fight could mean for their children and whether it will make school feel less safe. “We’ve had a lot of families reach out in a bit of a panic,” Jernigan said. He said transgender and gender-diverse children may not follow the legal arguments themselves, but they hear how adults in their communities talk about people like them. When they hear phrases like “these people” or “those people,” Jernigan said, they understand they are being singled out. That can be especially unsettling for children approaching middle school, he said, when situations involving locker rooms and trying to fit in already feel scary. “There’s nothing sinister or nefarious about trans kids,” Jernigan said. “They’re just kids who want to go out for recess and hate math.”

‘Maine’s first affordable senior housing community for LGBTQ+ older adults’ has its grand opening

Read more at News Center Maine.

An affordable senior housing community, described as “Maine’s first affordable senior housing community with programs and services for LGBTQ+ and older adults,” opens Wednesday (August 19). 

Equality Commons is a 54-unit community that is opening next to the Equality Community Center (ECC) at 25 Casco Street in downtown Portland, according to a release from the Equality Community Center. 

The community for residents aged 55 and older will provide “affordable homes and a safe, inclusive place for LGBTQ+ older adults and their allies to age with grace and dignity,” the release stated. 

The grand opening and ribbon-cutting ceremony will take place on Wednesday from 5:30-7:30 p.m., officials said. 

The housing will be situated next to the ECC at 15 Casco Street, which will offer programs and services tailored for the seniors residing there, “specifically designed to support LGBTQ+ older adults,” according to the release.

ECC said the new community will not only address the shortage of affordable housing but also provide a safe, inclusive environment where LGBTQ+ older adults and “other marginalized community members and their allies can age with dignity while remaining connected to community.”

“Equality Commons brings affordable housing, community resources and LGBTQ+-affirming services together in one location,” Ed Gardner, an ECC founding member, said. 

According to the release, “LGBTQ+ older adults can face higher risks of poverty, social isolation, chronic health conditions, discrimination and unstable or hostile living environments. Many are more likely to live alone and have limited family support or caregivers and may encounter discrimination in rental housing because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. As people age and become more reliant on others for care and support, some also fear discrimination or retaliation if they are open about who they are.”

The apartments in Equality Commons are affordable for households earning about 50 to 60 percent of the adjusted median income in the greater Portland area, as determined by MaineHousing, the release stated.

More than 250 people have joined the waitlist for the 54 apartments, officials said. Leasing has officially begun, and they are still accepting names for the waitlist.

Equality Commons features studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom apartments, a community room, a retail café with outdoor seating, a back patio, laundry facilities, and a bike room. Nineteen of the apartments are accessible, the release stated.

Eleven accessible units have been designated for residents with disabilities, including those living with HIV/AIDS, in collaboration with the Frannie Peabody Center.

Record Breaking: LGBTQ+ Adults Now 12% of Population; Greater than 10% in 40 of 50 States

Read more at HRC.

The Human Rights Campaign Foundation today released updated population estimates showing that a record-high 12% of U.S. adults – roughly 25.6 million people – identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or gender diverse. The analysis, drawn from more than 2.4 million responses to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey collected between 2021 and 2024, is one of the most comprehensive looks at the LGBTQ+ population to date. The Household Pulse Survey is one of the last major federal data sources to include a gender identity measure before the Trump Administration removed sexual orientation and gender identity questions from roughly 360 federal data collections. 

Key Data Points: 

  • 40: Number of states with an LGBTQ+ population of greater than 10% (plus the District of Columbia). 
    • That includes electoral battleground states such as Arizona (13.34%), Georgia (11.46%) Michigan (10.95%), New Hampshire (11.88%), North Carolina (10.56%), Ohio (11.29%), Pennsylvania (11.14%), and Texas (12.54%), 
  • 25.6 million: Number of U.S. adults who identify as LGBTQ+ 
  • 12%: Percentage of adult population who identify as LGBTQ+
  • More than half of all LGBTQ+ adults (53.8%) are between 18 and 34 – a signal of sustained, long-term growth in political and economic power as this generation ages into peak spending and voting years. 
  • Growing diversity across the community: Hispanic adults make up a larger share of the LGBTQ+ population (18%) than of non-LGBTQ+ adults (13%); Black adults make up a smaller share, about 9%, compared to 12%, reinforcing that LGBTQ+ identity cuts across every racial and ethnic community. 
  • Bisexual+ people are the largest group at over 7% of all U.S. adults. 

Why It Matters: 

HRCF’s estimate is notably higher than Gallup’s most recent 9% figure, a gap that researchers attribute to differences in survey methods rather than a sudden shift in identification. The new population figures come as midterm 2026 elections ramp up across the nation and LGBTQ+ people are a deciding voting bloc for many tight races that will determine control of Congress. At the same time, federal agencies have stripped sexual orientation and gender identity questions from hundreds of data sets. This is a disturbing Trump Administration trend meant to erase the LGBTQ+ community from the statistics that shape public policy, community resource development, corporate strategy, and campaign outreach.

“Reliable data are essential for understanding who lives in this country and what our communities need to thrive. Removing sexual orientation and gender identity questions from surveys like the one used for this analysis introduces significant gaps in this understanding. These findings show that LGBTQ+ people are a substantial and growing segment of the population, underscoring the need for our continued inclusion in data collection efforts, said HRC Foundation Sr. Director of Research and Education Tari Hanneman.

The economic influence of the LGBTQ+ community continues to grow at a time when diversity and inclusion initiatives are under federal attack. A recent HRCF consumer report showed LGBTQ+ consumers wield over $1.4 trillion in spending power, with 7 in 10 already putting it behind companies that invest in inclusive policies and practices that lead to stronger consumer trust, market share growth, and better talent retention. 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑