Voters remove fiercely anti-trans city council trio and elect the city’s first openly gay councilmember

This blog is originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation

Residents sought councilmembers focused on solving real issues rather than spreading fear.

Voters in Odessa, Texas, have decisively rejected the city’s anti-trans stance by ousting three city council members who backed the controversial bathroom ban and electing the city’s first openly gay councilmember.

Craig Stoker, the executive director of the local Meals on Wheels, ran on a platform centered around improving the city’s infrastructure. In contrast, his opponent, incumbent Denise Swanner, focused her campaign on homophobic rhetoric.

Swanner’s campaign distributed political mailers stating that the only thing she and Stoker had in common was being in relationships with men. Although the race was nonpartisan, this was part of Swanner’s effort to associate Stoker with the Democratic Party.

Craig Stoker remained unfazed by the attacks during the campaign.

“None of it was truly about me,” Stoker told the Texas Tribune. “It was their fear of losing a seat, losing an election, losing the title. I came into this campaign with the mindset that I’m going to have to rely on the work I’ve done in the community and the reputation I’ve built preceding me. That’s all I got.”

He added, “I understood the outcome was too important. If I could pull this off, what I would have the ability to do completely outweighed whatever they were slinging at me. And the ability to represent people who have probably never had a voice in the City Council chamber became too important to me.”

Stoker’s strategy resonated with voters. He secured the at-large seat with 56% of the vote, a remarkable achievement in a county where Donald Trump earned 76% of the vote.

His opponent, Denise Swanner, and two other incumbents—Mayor Javier Joven and councilmember Mark Matta—were key figures in a conservative majority on the six-member council. This group had pushed an agenda that included a $10,000 bounty on transgender individuals who use bathrooms or locker rooms not aligned with their sex assigned at birth.

“Voters said this is not how we want our city run… I agree, and we have to do a better job for the people,” said Cal Hendrick, who defeated Joven, in an interview with the Odessa American, which had dubbed the trio “The Squad.”

The election results have sparked hope among residents that city leadership will pivot away from divisive social issues and refocus on critical local concerns like infrastructure.

Odessa gained national attention for its extreme anti-trans bathroom ordinance, which allows any individual—regardless of residency—to sue a transgender person for at least $10,000 in damages for using a bathroom not aligned with their sex assigned at birth. There is no limit on the potential damages.

Last month, the city council expanded the ordinance to apply to private facilities in addition to public ones. The law also enforces criminal penalties, deeming violations a Class C misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500. Refusal to leave a bathroom after being asked can result in trespassing charges.

The ordinance defines biological sex based on birth certificates, whether issued at birth or amended for clerical errors. This means transgender individuals with updated birth certificates reflecting their gender identity could still violate the law if they use bathrooms aligning with their gender.

The election marks a significant shift in Odessa’s political landscape and a potential turning point for the city’s future direction.

City offers $10,000 reward for reporting trans individuals using public restrooms

This blog is originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

This marks the first instance of a city allowing individuals to sue trans people for using public restrooms.

The city of Odessa, Texas, has implemented a $10,000 bounty for anyone who reports a transgender person using a restroom that matches their gender identity, according to independent journalist Erin Reed.

Under this ordinance, individuals—excluding local and state government officials—are allowed to sue transgender people for using such facilities. The rewards for successful claims include “injunctive relief” to prevent further violations, nominal and compensatory damages if the plaintiff can prove harm, statutory damages of at least $10,000 per violation, as well as court costs and attorney’s fees.

While the bounty is set at a minimum of $10,000, there is no maximum limit on how much the reward can grow.

In addition to the bounty, Odessa’s ordinance includes criminal penalties for individuals who use restrooms that align with their gender identity. Those found in violation of the law can be charged with a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $500. Anyone who refuses to use a bathroom corresponding with what the city considers their biological sex—after being asked to leave by a building owner—could also face misdemeanor trespassing charges.

The law defines “biological sex” based on birth certificates, either the original or a corrected version in cases of clerical errors. This means that even if a transgender person has updated their birth certificate to reflect their gender identity, they could still be in violation of the ordinance if they use a bathroom that aligns with their gender.

There are no exceptions for disabled individuals who may be accompanied by someone of a different gender, and the law could potentially lead to lawsuits targeting people who are gender non-conforming or whose gender expression doesn’t fit societal norms.

Similar bathroom bans with criminal penalties have been enacted in states like Utah and Florida, while other states, like North Dakota, have laws without clear penalties or enforcement mechanisms. Erin Reed compared Odessa’s bounty system to the anti-abortion bounty laws in Texas, where private citizens are empowered to sue anyone who aids in an abortion. This strategy shifts the responsibility of enforcement from government officials to private individuals, circumventing the usual legal processes.

Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, condemned the ordinance, telling the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”

He added, “It enables vigilantes to target anyone they don’t think matches the gender expression they expect to see in the bathroom, and that is truly insane.”

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑