France creates platform to attract US and other disaffected researchers

*this is reported by Science Business.

The French government has launched a platform to pair universities and research organisations with international researchers looking to relocate. Called Choose France for Science, the platform is particularly interested in attracting researchers working in areas related to health, climate change, digital technologies and space. 

While created as a response to the mounting pressure on US scientists, the initiative will be open to all. “We suspect that there will be a lot of Americans, [and] it’s essentially for them that we’re doing this, but it’s not reserved for American researchers,” an official at the French higher education and research ministry told Science|Business.

The platform will feature at a high-profile meeting for the global research community hosted by French president Emmanuel Macron on May 5. But it has been opened early so that the National Research Agency can start pre-selecting projects and applications, in order to “avoid wasting time and prepare to welcome [researchers] in the best way possible,” the ministry official said.

The international scientists will be selected according to the relevance of their research work, he added.

The government intends to mobilise new resources, outside of the national research budget, to support their recruitment. This will cover up to 50% of the costs, with host institutions making up the rest from their own funds, with the help of local authorities and the private sector. 

The French scheme is also intended to spur Brussels and other EU nations to follow suit. “If Europe wants to act, it can very well build on what has been done on the French level,” the ministry official said.

Other EU member states have started to mobilise. Earlier this week, the Research Council of Norway launched a €8.4-million fund to facilitate the recruitment of top international researchers, while Germany could spend some of its €500-billion infrastructure and climate package to attract US scientists.

France’s earlier willingness to court US researchers has received a mixed reaction from the academic community. In an opinon column published by Le Monde, Université Paris Cité lecturer Théo Besson claimed that the intention was “laudable” but its realisation “unrealistic” given the substantial lack of investment in research in France and uncompetitive salaries.

In another article, economist Philippe Askenazy said that it was “futile” to think that a wave of US academics would leave an environment that remains “exceptional” despite the Trump administration’s crackdown on science. Yet there are signs of movement, with data from Nature indicating that US scientists submitted 32% more applications for jobs abroad between January and March 2025 than during the same period last year.



    Meanwhile, Aix-Marseille University has received nearly 300 applications to its Safe Place for Science programme in less than a month. Many come from experienced researchers at organisations like NASA and universities such as Yale and Stanford. According to university president Éric Berton, who provided details in an op-ed published last week by Libération, most applications were sent via encrypted messaging services, along with “worrying, sometimes chilling, testimonies.”

    Some cited the lack of clarity regarding future funding sources as a reason to move, others mentioned limits on their research freedom or the political climate sparking general anxiety within the research community.

    Up to 40 candidates will be interviewed in May. The first batch of researchers selected should arrive in early June.

    Scientific refugees

    In the Libération article, Berton joins forces with former French president François Hollande to propose the creation of a “scientific refugee” status for researchers experiencing political pressure. “Just like journalists or the political opposition, when they are hindered, scientists must necessarily be able to be recognised as refugees in their own right,” they write.

    The idea has already been turned into a bill in the National Assembly, with the aim of supporting relocation procedures. This could include the creation of an “emergency scientific visa” at a time when “current asylum mechanisms fail to consider the specificities of the academic environment and the threats weighing on scientists within authoritarian regimes,” the document says.

    According to Berton, the refugee status would be offered “to all researchers whose academic freedom is restricted, whether from countries at war or in the grip of obscurantism,” such as the beneficiaries from the French government’s Pause programme.

    No date is set for the bill to be discussed by the National Assembly, but Berton told Science|Business that he hoped that Macron would back the idea at the May 5 meeting. This will “provide lasting protection for scientists threatened worldwide by dictators and conservatives,” he said.

    Ekaterina Zaharieva, the European commissioner responsible for research, has previously alluded to a potential “special passport for science,” but no concrete proposals have been brought forward.

    Poll of scientists shows large majority weighing leaving US

    *This is being reported by The Hill.

    More than three-quarters of scientists in the U.S are weighing leaving the country and are looking at Europe and Canada as their top relocation spots, according to a survey released Thursday

    The scientific journal Nature poll found that 75.3 percent of scientists are considering leaving the U.S. after the administration cut funding for research. Nearly a quarter of respondents, 24.7 percent, disagreed. 

    The highest contingent of researchers who are looking to move out of the country were those who are early in their careers. Nearly 550, out of 690 who responded to the survey, said they are considering leaving the U.S. Out of the 340 Ph.D. students, 255 shared the same inclination, the poll found.

    The administration, along with tech billionaire and close Trump adviser Elon Musk, with the help of the Department of Government Efficiency, has terminated entire agencies and made cuts in the last two months in an effort to shrink the size and scope of the federal government.

    Some of those reductions were felt at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), where all grants for equity issues, which encompass studying Black maternal health and HIV, were canceled. The cap on indirect costs of NIH grants was capped at 15 percent. 

    The NIH was also ordered recently to halt efforts to terminate the funding for grants intended for hospitals, universities and other institutions by a federal judge after numerous lawsuits. 

    Former Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said she was concerned about the recent cuts to grants flowing through the NIH. 

    “I’m worried on a lot of fronts,” Sebelius said Wednesday. “The kinds of cuts that were just announced are devastating and will set science back and set research back.”

    These cuts have also affected the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which has been hit with layoffs.

    More than three-quarters of Americans, 76 percent, said they have a great or fair amount of confidence in scientists to do what is best for the public, according to a Pew Research Center survey that was published in mid-November last year. The figure was a minor uptick from October 2023, when 73 percent of respondents said the same. 

    Around 1,650 people responded to Nature’s survey. The margin of error and the dates the survey was conducted were not available to The Hill.

    Blog at WordPress.com.

    Up ↑