Idaho Republicans pass bill making it a felony for transgender people to use public bathrooms

Read more at the Advocate.

The Idaho House passed legislation that could make it a felony for transgender people to step foot in a bathroom matching their gender identity.

The legislation takes aim directly at trans individuals using the restroom or locker rooms, threatening those who “knowingly” and “willfully” enter facilities designated for the “opposite biological sex” with prison time. A first offense would count as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail. Those caught using the bathroom in repeated offenses, however, could be convicted as felons and face up to five years in prison.

Idaho Rep. Cornel Rasor, the bill’s Republican sponsor, used transphobic rhetoric as he claimed the change in law was necessary to prevent individuals from criminal actions. “It prevents discomfort and voyeurism escalation and assaults, while preserving single-user options and narrow exceptions so no one is denied access for emergency aid,” Rasor said, according to the Idaho Capital Sun.

But Democratic Idaho Rep. Chris Mathias predicted the opposite would occur. “Forcing people who don’t look like the sex that they were born with, or transgender folks, forcing them to use other people’s bathrooms is going to put a lot of people in danger,” he said.

Ahead of the vote, a transgender Idaho resident, Nikson Matthews, urged lawmakers to consider the real-world consequences of the proposal, walking them through what enforcement could look like in practice. Matthews described a scenario in which someone sees him, a bearded man, enter a men’s restroom, recognizes or suspects he is transgender, and calls the police. Officers, he said, would arrive to find “a bearded man using the men’s bathroom,” yet investigate him solely because of his identity. Under the bill, Matthews warned, he could face up to a year in jail for “peeing, washing my hands, or even being in the bathroom to grab a tissue.”

He said the alternative, forcing him to use women’s facilities, could be even more dangerous, describing how his appearance could provoke confrontation or violence from others who perceive him as a man entering a women’s space. “Every single day when I’m out in public, I have to decide,” Matthews told lawmakers. “Do I feel like going to jail today, or do I feel like being attacked?”

Ultimately, every Democrat in the Idaho House voted against the bill, but the party represents just nine of the chamber’s 70 members. Six Republicans joined with Democrats in voting no, but the bill passed by a 54-15 margin. It now heads to the Idaho Senate, where Republicans hold 29 of 35 seats.

Idaho lawmakers last year voted to restrict transgender people’s access to state-run facilities, including universities, prisons, and domestic violence shelters. The new bill criminalizes bathroom use in both publicly owned government buildings and private businesses that provide public accommodations.

Critics of the legislation cast it as a misguided attack on broader LGBTQ+ rights.

“Idaho politicians have positioned themselves as leaders in this calculated strategy to chip away at the rights of trans people. Each year, a more restrictive anti-trans bathroom law is passed that expands on the previous one,” the state’s chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union said.

Trans people are fleeing Kansas over demands to surrender IDs

Read more at Pink News.

Trans Kansans are reportedly leaving the US state in droves after thousands had their driving licences forcibly revoked.

The midwestern state revoked more than 1,700 IDs this month after handing letters to thousands of citizens demanding they surrender their driving licences.

It comes after lawmakers passed SB244, a sweeping anti-trans bill banning Kansans from using public toilets and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. The bill also allows resident to submit bounty-style lawsuits against anyone they spot in facilities who they believe are transgender or non-binary.

Trans people in Kansas could face up to six months in jail if they don’t surrender their IDs. (Getty)

In response, the Kansas Division of Vehicles informed trans residents that their licences were now “invalid immediately” and must be exchanged for new licences documenting their birth sex.

Those who continue to drive without surrendering the licences could face “additional penalties”, including a $1,000 fine or even imprisonment.

Trans Kansan Jaelynn Abegg, who received a letter demanding her licence be revoked, said she plans to move to another state later this month and refuses to surrender her ID.

“I’m pretty heartbroken,” the 41-year-old told NBC News. “It is a continuation of the message that the Legislature has been sending out for years now, and that is that transgender people are not welcome in Kansas.”

Another woman, Andrea Ellis, said that, upon travelling to the DMV to have her licence changed, staff were confused over what to do, eventually giving her a temporary license with no changes.

Matthew Neumann, a Kansas-born trans man, said he refuses to leave the state over the legislation despite being threatened for using public toilets.

“I’m just disappointed and frustrated,” he said. “I’m just hoping that maybe this is the wake up call we need.”

Lawmakers passed the widely criticised bill despite governor Laura Kelly vetoing it in February, which was overturned by the Republican majority.

The Democratic governor said the law was “poorly drafted” and that its provisions were ripe for abuse that would have consequences “far beyond the intent to limit the right for trans people to use the appropriate bathroom”.

“[The law] will undoubtedly impact many others who are targeted with animus whether or not they are transgender. Meanwhile, leaders ignore real challenges facing families,” she continued. “This was sadly politics over people, but we will keep fighting for dignity and freedom for all LGBTQ+ people.”

Multiple cases have emerged across the UK and US over the past year, as anti-trans furore over toilet usage has grown louder, with many involving cisgender and transgender individuals.

In August last year, an 18-year-old cisgender lesbian said she was forced to expose her breasts to a staff member in a Buffalo Wild Wings who began banging on the toilet stall she was occupying and yelling that the “man needs to get out of here”.

Two anonymous trans Kansans sued the state over the bill’s passage last month, arguing that it violates human rights laws on autonomy and personal freedoms.

Douglas County District Judge James McCabria declined to grant a temporary restraining order against the law’s enforcement while the case proceeds earlier this week.

Harper Seldin, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) representing the plaintiffs said that Kansas was singling out trans residents “for unique social stigma”.

“They were suddenly required, with no notice or opportunity to be heard, to present themselves to the DMV to obtain driver’s licenses that announced to everyone – the teller at the bank, the clerk at the hotel, the poll worker on election day – that they are transgender,” Seldin said.

US ‘pro-family’ group helped Senegal push anti-LGBTQ+ law

Read more at Pink News.

US-based lobbyists known for calling homosexuality a public health threat reportedly advised Senegal officials on how to push an anti-LGBTQ+ law which increased maximum sentences for LGBTQ+ people.

Senegal’s National Assembly garnered international condemnation earlier this month after passing a bill that doubles the maximum penalty for same-sex relations.

While homosexuality has been illegal in the African nation since the mid-1960s, the newly passed law makes openly identifying as queer punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Senegal lawmakers supportive of the new bill declared that LGBTQ+ citizens would no longer be able to “breathe in this country” adding to applause that they planned to strip all their freedoms.

A report from Reuters over the weekend revealed that US lobbyist organisation MassResistance, which describes itself as “pro family,” worked with Senegalese campaigners to push for the legislation’s passage.

The Massachusetts-based organisation, which claims that LGBTQ+ rights are an attack on so-called “cultural norms,” reportedly worked with Senegalese Islamic and civil rights network Samm Jikko Yi to outline a campaign strategy supporting further restrictions on homosexuality.

Samm Jikko Yi, a collective of anti-LGBTQ+ activists, has been campaigning for tougher sentences on LGBTQ+ relations since at least 2020. In 2024, the group allegedly contacted MassResistance to discuss the most effective way to lobby for harsher anti-LGBTQ+ laws.

Officials representing both groups reportedly discussed ways to raise awareness, garner support for their cause, and mobilising alongside Senegalese authorities, according to Samm Jikko Yi’s former coordinator Ababacar Mboup.

It is not known whether the collaboration had impacted the Senegal Parliament’s vote to expand article 319 of the Penal Code on consensual same-sex conduct. The 11 March vote passed by a staggering 135 to zero, with just three abstentions.

It is the first known case of a US lobbying organisation attempting to shape anti-LGBTQ+ laws in an African nation after US president Donald Trump began his second term in January 2025.

MassResistance’s field director, Arthur Schaper, told the news outlet that there was a “renewed push” to begin influencing LGBTQ+ rights and implementing stricter bans overseas given the Trump administration’s stance on such matters.

He said the organisation had also begun attempting to influence LGBTQ+ rights in Ghana, where homosexuality is partially illegal for men, by supporting a newly proposed anti-LGBTQ+ law which would punish anyone who identifies as, or supports, LGBTQ+ people with up to three years in prison.

Ghanaian human rights NGO, Freedom International, confirmed that MassResistance had been in touch regarding plans to curtail LGBTQ+ rights, adding that the organisations had exchanged “educational materials” during the discussion.

Medical experts routinely warn that laws banning homosexuality pose a significant health risk to all citizens by deterring men who have sex with men (MSM), who are at increased risk of catching the disease, from undergoing HIV tests.

Government figures suggest that MSM in Senegal are much more likely to have HIV than any other group. Health workers in the country have warned that harsher punishments for homosexuality will make HIV prevalence much worse.

First puberty blockers, now hormones: England’s NHS bans more gender-affirming drugs

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

This week, England’s National Health Service (NHS) threw up yet another roadblock to gender-affirming care for transgender youth in the UK.

On Monday, the NHS announced it was pausing new referrals for feminizing and masculinizing hormones for 16- and 17-year-olds suffering from gender dysphoria, citing a collection of studies commissioned by the health service after publication of the controversial Cass Report in 2024, the Guardian reports.

That study recommended “extreme caution” initiating hormone treatments, including estrogen and testosterone, and a “clear clinical rationale for providing hormones at this stage rather than waiting until an individual reaches 18.”

The new NHS report comes to a similar conclusion.

“Following the Cass review, NHS England commissioned an in-depth review of all available clinical evidence for using estrogen or testosterone either alone or with other medications to treat gender incongruence and dysphoria,” the report states. “This review has established that the available evidence does not support the continued use of masculinizing or feminizing hormones to treat gender incongruence or dysphoria for young people under 18.”

The Cass Review, which contradicted long-established guidance around the efficacy of gender-affirming care for trans youth, has already prompted the health service to halt prescriptions of puberty-suppressing drugs for trans youth, with an indefinite ban for trans minors enacted by the UK government in December 2024.

The UK’s Health Secretary cited an “unacceptable safety risk” for halting new prescriptions of the drugs, though puberty blockers are still prescribed for early onset puberty and other conditions for children not suffering from gender dysphoria.

Puberty blockers, or GnRH analogues, slow down or halt the onset of puberty in young people taking them, and have preceded and been accompanied by the use of estrogen or testosterone for gender transition.

The positive effects of that combination therapy were all but ignored in the new NHS review, say critics of the decision to halt new prescriptions.

The Dutch Protocol, the “gold standard” for transition care, “involves prescribing GnRH analogues (puberty blockers) first to suppress puberty, then adding hormones later,” writes trans journalist Erin Reed in a story questioning the report’s findings.

“When hormones are introduced, the GnRH analogues are sometimes continued alongside them — the blocker keeps suppressing the body’s natural hormones while the prescribed estrogen or testosterone does its work. This overlap period means patients are on both GnRH analogues and hormones at the same time. That is the ‘combination therapy’ the reviews claim to examine.”  

But the reviews “inexplicably excluded every study” where GnRH analogues and feminising and masculinising hormones were taken in succession or combination. The review tossed out hundreds of such studies in favour of a “salami slicing” approach that examined the hormones in isolation.

NHS was explicit in its methodology.

“Any reference to GnRH analogues in the context of puberty suppression or used as puberty-suppressing hormones must be excluded,” the report states.

“NHS England’s own data, cited in the reviews themselves, confirms that 98% of its patients followed the very pathway every review was designed to exclude,” Reed writes.

She called the NHS evidence reviews “an extreme example of politically-manufactured science.”

Gender Plus, a leading private trans healthcare and education service in the UK, accused NHS England of ignoring clinical expertise and evidence provided by leaders in the field, including the Endocrine Society, which recommends introducing the hormones for trans youth once “persistence of gender incongruence has been confirmed and the young person has sufficient capacity to consent.”

“NHS England’s interpretation of the evidence is in contrast to every reputable expert body in the field of transgender healthcare,” said a spokesperson for the health group.

NHS said patients currently receiving hormone treatments can continue the therapy, “but this will need to be reviewed individually with their clinical team.”

“Banning new prescriptions of gender-affirming hormones for 16- and 17-year-olds is a profound attack on young people’s bodily autonomy,” said Tammy Hymas, policy lead at British advocacy organization TransActual, “with trans people yet again cruelly singled out by this government.”

Senegal doubles penalties for homosexuality amid gay sex panic

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

Following campaign pledges from both the president and prime minister in Senegal’s latest elections, the country’s Parliament on Wednesday passed a bill doubling penalties in the far West African nation for homosexuality, described in the measure as “acts against nature.”

The revised law is just the latest attack on “degenerate” Western values by government and religious officials.

Same-sex acts in Senegal will now earn 5-10 years in prison. Acts committed with a minor are subject to the maximum penalty, France 24 reports.

“Homosexuals will no longer breathe in this country. Homosexuals will no longer have freedom of expression in this country,” lawmaker Diaraye Ba told colleagues in the National Assembly to applause.

The bill, passed overwhelmingly with three abstentions and no opposing votes, awaits President Bassirou Diomaye Faye’s signature.

In addition to doubling prison terms and fines for homosexual acts, the measure includes criminal penalties for those found guilty of promoting or financing same-sex relationships.

Passage of the bill comes amid a veritable gay panic in Senegal, with a wave of arrests and anti-LGBTQ+ protests by religious groups in the Muslim-majority country demanding tougher penalties.

Social media has been flooded with homophobic messages outing gay people, and the media has fixated on the government arrests with headlines like “Big homo clean-up” and “Bisexuals, walking dangers.”

Adding to the hysteria, the gay sweep has been conflated with a child sex ring investigation that detained gang members accused of sexual violence against minors.

The wave of arrests began in Senegal’s capital, Dakar, in February, with the detention of two of Senegal’s highest-profile celebrities, among 12 people rounded up and charged with committing “unnatural” acts and other crimes.

“The majority of Senegalese do not accept homosexuality. Our culture rejects it, and we are firmly opposed to it,” said Amadou Moustapha Ndieck Sarré, the government’s Minister of Employment.

Over 90% of Senegalese oppose acceptance of gay people, according to Equaldex, the LGBTQ+ collaborative knowledge base. The country ranks 4 out of 100 on the site’s Equality Index. More than half of the 53 countries in Africa impose penalties for homosexuality, from caning and fines to death.

Charles Dotou, head of the Senegal LGBTQ Association, has resigned over the new legislation.

“Most of the same-sex relationships were hidden anyway. There are even people who are married in the society and who are still entertaining a same-sex relationship because of the norm and the cultural norm in that society,” Dotou told the BBC.

“People will be hiding more, it will create more fear, and people will be scared to live normally in that community. So there will be an exodus of people, particularly people who were already exposed, so that that creates a bit of chaos in society,” he added.

Iowa Gov. touts new law banning local trans rights protections as “the right thing to do”

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

Iowa’s Republican Governor just signed a new law banning protections for trans people at the city and county level.

Gov. Kim Reynolds signed Senate File 579 earlier this week, the Des Moines Register reports. The bill, passed by Iowa’s House of Delegates on March 5 in a party-line vote, prevents local governments throughout the state from adding categories of civil rights violations that are not included in the Iowa Civil Rights Act.

“A city or local government shall not enact any ordinance or other law which is broader or has different categories of unfair or discriminatory practices than those provided,” in the state civil rights code, the bill states.

As the Register notes, the law also bans nearly 20 local governments with existing trans protections in their civil rights laws from enforcing them.

Reynolds told reporters Wednesday that signing the bill “was the right thing to do.”

“We just believe that the locals should follow the state laws, especially when it comes to civil rights, otherwise we have a mismatch of rights out there,” she said, according to the Register.

Last year, Reynolds signed a law repealing civil rights protections for transgender people from the state’s civil rights law, making Iowa the first state in the U.S. to repeal anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class of people.

State Republican lawmakers made it clear that the point of the 2025 repeal was to ensure that Iowa’s anti-trans bathroom and sports bans and a law banning gender-affirming care for minors could survive potential court challenges, according to the Register.

“It does have an impact on protecting girls’ sports and making sure that we’re protecting girls in safe spaces, in restrooms and in lockers,” Reynolds said Wednesday of Senate File 579. “And so that was at jeopardy if we have a hodgepodge of mixed laws within our state.”

LGBTQ+ rights group One Iowa’s executive director, Max Mowitz, blasted Reynolds’ decision to ban trans protections at the local level, noting that the bill is one of only two pieces of legislation the governor has signed this year.

“Republicans acted as quickly as possible to remove any semblance of rights remaining for transgender Iowans, and took local civil rights commissions down with them,” Mowitz said in a statement, according to the Register.

“With all the issues facing Iowans at this moment, from cancer rates to water quality, Iowa Republicans can’t seem to agree on anything other than taking away civil rights,” he said. “Gov. Kim Reynolds’ legacy will be having removed more civil rights protections from her constituents than any other governor in history.”

Ken Paxton rolls out “bathroom bill” snitch line allegation ahead of heated Texas US Senate run-off

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

The aggrieved mother of a Texas high school student has submitted what’s being described as the first formal complaint lodged over failure to comply with the state’s draconian “bathroom bill” enacted in December, and Senate candidate Ken Paxton is making the most of it.

In a letter to the Office of Texas Attorney General, the woman, whose name was redacted by Texas Values, the right-wing anti trans organization who coached her complaint and published the letter to Paxton, claims that her daughter, a student at Austin High School, informed her that a “biological male” student “has been using the female restrooms and private spaces at Austin High School.”

The woman notified the school on January 10 of the “violation of the recent law passed by the Texas legislature that requires students to use the private facilities based on their biological sex.”

After receiving no response from the school after a second complaint, the woman contacted Texas Values, which provided her with a form letter threatening the school. Administrators ignored that correspondence, as well, the woman claims.

Texas Values describes itself as “the largest statewide nonprofit organization dedicated to standing for faith, family, and freedom in Texas.”

A week later, at Texas Values’ urging, the woman wrote her rudimentary complaint with multiple misspellings and sent it to the AG’s office.

“I hope that the parent and her daughter can find some relief and put a stop to this or else the school must face consequences for not following the Texas Women’s Privacy Act,” said Mary Elizabeth Castle, Director of Government Relations for the organization, in a blog post advertising the letter they coached her to write, headlined, “Breaking! Parent Files Formal Complaint Against Austin ISD for Breaking Texas Women’s Privacy Law.”

On Friday, Paxton notified the Austin Independent School District of a citizen complaint via a state tip line alleging the violation of Senate Bill 8, also known as the Women’s Privacy Act. The snitch line was launched shortly after the bill took effect in December “to ensure that state entities are not allowing mentally ill men to invade women’s spaces,” according to the AG’s office.

Paxton’s office did not confirm whether the complaint urged on by Texas Values was the same as that referenced in the AG’s announcement; whether the complaint was verified; or if an official investigation is under way, the Texas Tribune reports.

Paxton’s notification is a statutory prerequisite for filing a lawsuit against Austin ISD. The school district was advised it’s subject to a $5,000 penalty for every day that the violation continues. They have two weeks days to cure the “bathroom bill” breach, the letter warned.

“The law is clear that political subdivisions in Texas must not allow biological men to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms,” Paxton said in the statement. He said his office would explore every legal avenue available.

Paxton, a culture-warring MAGA favorite now in his third term as Texas AG, has overcome multiple scandals and survived an impeachment effort in 2023. Now he’s facing a heated U.S. Senate primary runoff with incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, after Paxton’s admission of infidelity last year and an impending divorce.

While in any other scenario he’d already have President Trump’s endorsement, a Paxton win could give Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico an edge in November. So far, Trump has stayed on the sidelines.

Texas Values, despite endorsing the aggrieved high school mom’s bathroom complaint, has yet to endorse either Republican in the Senate race, as well.

“Candidates must be able to demonstrate a firm commitment to protecting religious liberty, marriage and family, and innocent human life,” the group says in their “Faith & Family Voter Guide.”

Idaho House passes resolution- again- asking SCOTUS to overturn marriage equality

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

The Idaho House of Representatives passed a measure this week asking the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage across the U.S. But the legislation lost three Republican votes compared to a similar measure that passed in the state House last year.

As the Idaho Statesman reports, House Joint Memorial 17 passed in a 44–26 vote Tuesday. The measure, introduced by State Rep. Tony Wisniewski (R), is a formal legislative request for the Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 decision in Overgefell v. Hodges. The measure argues that the decision establishing the constitutional right of same-sex couple to legally marry is “at odds with the Constitution of the United States and the principles upon which the United States is established.” In its Obergefell ruling, the measure argues, the Court applied a definition of liberty that would not have been recognized by the country’s founders. The decision, it says, “relies on the dangerous fiction of treating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as a font of substantive rights” which “strays from the full meaning of the Constitution.”

House Joint Memorial 17 is identical to House Joint Memorial 1, which the Idaho House passed last year.

This time around, however, 17 Republican lawmakers joined House Democrats to vote against the measure, with three more Republican no votes than in 2025.

According to the Statesman, Republican Reps. Dori Healey and Mike Pohanka, who both voted for House Joint Memorial 1 last year, both voted against the 2026 measure. Grayson Stone, who is serving as a long-term substitute for Rep. Don Hall (R) and recently announced that he is running for Hall’s seat, also voted against the measure. Late last year, Hall replaced former Republican Rep. Lance Clow, who voted for House Joint Memorial 1. Hall resigned due to health issues earlier this year.

Stone reportedly acknowledged that his no vote might amount to “political suicide,” but cited the Bible as the reason for his vote.

“This entire argument is rooted in the Bible,” Stone said, according to the Statesman, noting that the Bible includes instructions on how to shave. “I just don’t understand why we have to apply the Bible to specific aspects of our life, but not all of it. So, I will be voting against this bill.”

Pohanka, meanwhile, noted that his own religious beliefs on same-sex marriage have not changed since he voted for the 2025 measure. However, he told the Statesman that he represents all his constituents and wants to get back to actually legislating.

“I thought we advanced [House Joint Memorial 1] last year,” he said. “This year, to me, it’s just going to cause hurt and pain and I don’t want to do that.”

Healey declined to comment on his vote, according to the Statesman.

House Joint Memorial 17 now advances to the Idaho Senate, which declined to vote on the 2025 measure. Even if the state senate approves House Joint Memorial 17, it would not compel the Supreme Court to act.

While conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have repeatedly signaled that they are eager to overturn Obergefell, last November the Court declined to hear a case challenging the decision. Fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett has also said that she thinks the court’s same-sex marriage ruling would remain in place because it affects many other rights, including medical, financial, family, and other social rights.

Trump admin directs prisons to wean trans inmates off of hormone therapy in defiance of court order

Read more at LGBTQ Nation.

Recent guidance from the Trump administration requires federal prisons to begin reducing transgender inmates’ hormone therapy treatments.

Medical experts warn that the move will have dangerous medical and psychological consequences for incarcerated trans people, while legal experts say the guidance violates a federal judge’s preliminary injunction in a case challenging the administration’s anti-trans prison policies.

As Advocate reports, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) issued the new guidance in February. It not only bans prisons from providing hormone therapy to inmates who were not receiving it prior to incarceration, but also orders prisons to develop plans for tapering off treatment for those already receiving it.

Dr. Carl Streed, a Boston-based researcher specializing in transgender health, describes the guidance as “alarming.”

“It’s essentially saying that a form of evidence-based care will no longer be provided to people under the purview of the Bureau of Prisons,” Streed told Advocate. “That means the policy runs counter to best practices and arguably probably the law in terms of providing care to inmates because it’s setting up a different standard for them versus the standard out in the community.”

According to Streed, trans inmates receiving hormone therapy to treat gender dysphoria will experience a range of adverse health effects stemming from the drop in hormone levels if their treatment is decreased, including changes in cognition and mood, increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and metabolic issues. For those who have already undergone surgeries as part of their gender-affirming care, the risks are even more serious.

“They no longer produce adequate endogenous hormones to a level that would be good for their health if we were to take away their exogenous hormones,” Streed said. “Now we’re going to take away hormone therapy for them — they are put at much greater risk than anybody else.”

As Just Detention International communications director Jesse Lerner-Kinglake said in a statement, the new policy will almost certainly exacerbate the already dangerous conditions for trans inmates. Data from the Department of Justice indicates transgender inmates are 10 times more likely to be sexually assaulted than straight prisoners, and multiple court cases have found that housing transgender women in men’s facilities and denying gender-related healthcare are violations of the Eighth Amendment, which bans cruel and unusual punishment.

But on January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed a sweeping anti-trans executive order, which, among other directives, instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to ensure that trans women are housed in men’s detention centers and that “no Federal funds are expended for any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.”

Trans inmates, Lerner-Kinglake said, “already had a bullseye on their back — and the federal government knows it. The rates of sexual abuse facing the transgender community were astronomical before these new policies. It’s hard to imagine this already abysmal situation getting worse. And yet it will.”

The administration has already been blocked from implementing its ban on gender-affirming care in prisons. Last year, three transgender people currently incarcerated in federal custody filed a class action suit against the administration and the Federal Bureau of Prisons challenging those policies. In June 2025, a federal judge granted a temporary injunction requiring the BOP to continue providing gender-affirming care to trans inmates as the case proceeds.

It’s unclear whether the administration believes that merely weaning trans inmates off hormone therapy represents a legitimate workaround. But Shayna Medley, senior litigation staff attorney at Advocates for Trans Equality, told Advocate that the new BOP guidance violates that injunction.

“The February 19 guidance from the Bureau of Prisons directing tapering of hormone therapy for transgender people in custody is a direct violation of the injunction in Kingdom v. Trump, which requires the BOP to continue providing hormones to people in custody with a gender dysphoria diagnosis,” Medley said. Advocates for Trans Equality’s position, she said, is that the guidance “is currently enjoined by the existing injunction in the Kingdom v. Trump litigation.”

“Implementation would be in direct violation of the federal court’s order to continue providing hormone therapy to transgender people in BOP custody with a gender dysphoria diagnosis.”

Florida Passes Sweeping, Dangerous Anti-LGBTQ Bill

Read more at Equality Florida.

Today (March 10), the Florida House passed the sweeping and dangerously vague “Anti-Diversity in Local Government” bill (HB 1001 / SB 1134) by a vote of 77-37, sending another bill rooted in anti-LGBTQ animus to Governor Ron DeSantis’s desk. Five Republicans joined House Democrats in opposing the legislation, including Representatives Hillary Cassel (R-Hollywood), Will Robinson (R-Bradenton), Chip LaMarca (R-Lighthouse Point), Jim Mooney (R-Key Largo), and Paula Stark (R-St. Cloud). 

The legislation is designed to intimidate cities and counties that celebrate and support the diverse communities they serve. Written in broad and ambiguous language, the bill is the most extreme of its kind in the country, creating confusion and fear for local governments that recognize LGBTQ residents and other communities that contribute to the strength and vibrancy of Florida’s cities.

The bill advanced after a highly contentious legislative process that exposed its broad application and sweeping penalties for a perceived violation. Local elected leaders from across Florida – including mayors, commissioners, and county officials – stood alongside thousands of residents to oppose the legislation and warn lawmakers about the harm it would cause to their communities.

Debate over the bill made expressly clear that LGBTQ people were a central target of the legislation. The public record, the bill sponsors’ own statements, and hours of legislative debate revealed the animus driving the effort to pressure local governments into pulling back from recognizing or resourcing programs targeting LGBTQ residents and other historically marginalized communities.

Despite the sponsors’ stated intent to dismantle diversity programs — with House sponsor Representative Dean Black declaring that “Florida is where DEI goes to D-I-E” — sustained public pressure over two years opposing the bill forced lawmakers to concede dozens of carve-outs to avert repeal, defunding, and harm to numerous local policies, programs, and events. For the LGBTQ community, this included amendments to protect and preserve the Pulse Memorial in Orlando and amendments ensuring local governments can continue to permit Pride festivals, even while navigating new restrictions on supporting or promoting them.

Equality Florida’s Executive Director, Stratton Pollitzer, provided the following response:

“This bill is dangerous, vague by design, and part of a broader political agenda of censorship and government overreach. Once again, Florida lawmakers have manufactured a sweeping anti-LGBTQ law — legislation intended to bully local governments and ​have a chilling effect on how they celebrate and support the diverse communities they serve.

 Florida’s LGBTQ community knows all too well how to fight back against unjust laws. Just as we did following the passage of Florida’s notorious ‘Don’t Say Gay or Trans’ law, ​we will fight every step of the way to limit the impact of this legislation, including in the courts.

Mayors and local elected officials from every corner of the state stood shoulder-to-shoulder with thousands of Floridians who showed up to oppose this legislation. We will continue to partner with local leaders who are committed to celebrating their LGBTQ residents and all of the diverse communities that make Florida strong.

The LGBTQ community is resilient. We stand alongside other impacted communities, firm in our resolve that no law can erase our presence or silence the millions of Floridians who believe in dignity, equality, diversity, and inclusion. Pride celebrations will continue. Communities will continue to gather. And LGBTQ people will remain visible in every part of Florida.”

House Speaker Daniel Perez has stated clearly that this bill does not ban Pride festivals or parades in Florida, while acknowledging new restrictions on supporting or promoting them.*

Implementation of the bill is marked for January 2027. As the bill heads to the Governor, it will now be up to cities and counties to determine how to navigate its sweeping scope and vagueness.

Equality Florida will continue working with local leaders, community organizations, and legal partners to monitor how the law is implemented and to challenge any attempts to use it to silence or erase LGBTQ communities.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑