Greece just got one big step closer to marriage equality

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

The conservative Greek government has garnered support for its same-sex marriage bill from liberal lawmakers.

Just days after hesitating on a timeline to introduce legislation to legalize gay marriage in Greece, the recently reelected center-right Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis received a significant boost for his campaign pledge with the endorsement of gay opposition leader Stefanos Kasselakis.

The legislation, revealed on Wednesday, faces strong opposition from a faction within Mitsotakis’ New Democracy party, other right-leaning lawmakers in the Greek Parliament, and the Greek Orthodox Church. However, support from the left-leaning Syriza party’s 38 members would secure its passage.

Kasselakis stated that he would overlook “imperfections” in the bill and would instruct his party to vote for the proposal, even though it maintains a prohibition on surrogacy for gay couples seeking parenthood. A prior draft legislation presented by Syriza earlier in the week would have granted this right to same-sex couples.


The leader of Syriza emphasized the “positive elements” of the legislation and criticized the right-wing New Democracy lawmakers opposing the bill for what he called their “political cowardice.”

Kasselakis rose to prominence in September after his unexpected election as the leader of the left-leaning opposition party. The 35-year-old former Goldman Sachs banker married his American husband, Tyler McBeth, in the U.S. in October.

“When this draft law comes to parliament,” Kasselakis told Star TV in Greece, “it will be approved thanks to Syriza.”

While surrogacy remains restricted for gay couples in the proposed bill, full parental rights would be extended to same-sex parents who already have children.

“We won’t change the law on assisted parenthood,” Prime Minister Mitsotakis declared, addressing the issue publicly for the first time on Wednesday evening. He emphasized that same-sex couples would still be able to adopt children.

The prime minister pointed to the challenges faced by the children of gay couples, who lack recognition under Greek law, as a driving force behind the proposed change. Greece legalized same-sex civil partnerships in 2015.

A recent poll indicates that 49% of Greeks are against legalizing same-sex unions, while 35% are in favor. A majority also opposes granting full parental rights to gay or lesbian couples. The Church’s objections to extending marriage rights to same-sex couples are centered around concerns about gay parents raising children.

Proposed California law could force social media companies to censor LGBTQ+ content

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

A new California social media law could harm LGBTQ+ youth, according to an internet civil liberties group. The group, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), has advised California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) not to approve the proposed law for an upcoming voter referendum.

Two advocates have called it “a misguided and unconstitutional proposal.”

The law, entitled “The Common Sense Initiative to Protect California Kids Online,” seeks to protect minors from specific online “injuries” by allowing people to sue social media companies for $5,000 per violation, up to $1 million per child, according to The Sacramento Bee.

“It would be up to the courts to decide the merits of a parent’s claim,” explains James Steyer, the CEO and founder of Common Sense Media, a nonprofit that provides information on the suitability of tech platforms for children. “Tech companies have avoided any accountability for their profit-driven actions and it is time to change that, either through the Legislature or through the ballot.”

But the proposal currently doesn’t specifically list which “injuries” are covered or how social media companies could avoid inflicting them. That non-specificity concerns the EFF because they worry that the law could be used to censor LGBTQ+ content as “harmful.”


In a letter to Bonta, the EFF policy analyst Joe Mullin and senior staff attorney Aaron Mackey wrote that the proposed law violates social media companies’ constitutionally protected free speech rights and would result in the censoring of LGBTQ+ content.

“For example, elected officials in both California and other states have said that access to LGBTQ+ content harms children,” Mullin and Mackey wrote. “Lawsuits would likely push online services to restrict access to medical, health, and sexual information that many LGBTQ+ children need.”

Mullin and Mackey’s concern isn’t unprecedented. In fact, groups like the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU and the parents of transgender youth worry that a similar proposed federal law, the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), could compel social media companies to censor LGBTQ+ content to avoid possible lawsuits.

Specifically, the ACLU and parents of trans youth worry that state attorneys general who consider queerness a social fad or a form of mental illness that causes kids to harm themselves, participate in risky sexual behavior, and increase their risks for depression, suicide, or drug use would use KOSA to sue social media platforms companies.

“[The proposed state law] is a misguided and unconstitutional proposal that will restrict all Californians’ access to online information,” Mullin and Mackey added.

Gender-affirming care clinic burned down in horrific arson: “This is terrorism”

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ nation.

Firefighters in Decatur, Georgia have determined that an October fire at a local gender-affirming care clinic was intentionally set in a move one activist has labeled “terrorism.”

The fire in the city’s historic Blair Building was “contained to one office, and no injuries were reported,” according to a recent statement from the City of Decatur Fire Rescue Department.

The statement expressed that an investigation has determined the fire “to be incendiary in nature, indicating the fire was intentionally set.” No suspects have been identified.


The Blair building houses several medical providers, but a police report confirms that the target of the fire was QMed, which focuses on gender-affirming care, Decaturish reported.

“We won’t be intimidated,” QMed owner Dr. Izzy Lowell told Atlanta News First. “We will not stop providing life-saving care to our patients.” While the office is “completely destroyed,” Lowell said the clinic is seeing patients remotely. She also confirmed the FBI is investigating the arson attack as a hate crime.

Georgia passed a hate crime law in 2020. H.B. 426 became the first law in the state to specifically protect LGBTQ+ residents and give stronger punishments to those whose crimes target victims due to their LGBTQ+ identity, or due to other factors such as their race, religion, or national origin.

Trans activist Alejandra Caraballo wrote on X that the attack “is following the antiabortion playbook of destroying clinics to get them shut down.”

“This is terrorism,” she concluded.

The Movement Advancement Project gave Georgia 1 point out of a possible 44.5 for its LGBTQ+ policies, leaving it with an overall rating of “low.”

In March 2023, Gov. Brian Kemp (R) signed a ban on trans youth receiving gender-affirming health care. The law revokes the licenses of medical professionals who administer surgeries or hormone replacement therapy for transgender people under the age of 18. The law creates an exemption for cisgender youth; they are allowed gender-affirming care to conform to their sex assigned at birth.

Puberty blockers, however, are not banned under the legislation.

The American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics have all rejected claims that gender-affirming care harms transgender children or adults. Additionally, gender-affirming surgery is almost never performed on youth.

Classroom searched by police after anonymous complaint about an “obscene” LGBTQ+ book

In a recent incident, an anonymous complaint regarding a frequently banned LGBTQ+ book prompted local police to conduct a search in a Massachusetts classroom, citing concerns about “obscene” and “pornographic” material. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has strongly criticized this incident.

“Police going into schools and searching for books is the sort of thing you hear about in communist China and Russia,” Ruth A. Bourquin, senior and managing attorney for the ACLU of Massachusetts, told The Berkshire Eagle this week. “What are we doing?”

The Great Barrington Police Department and the Berkshire District Attorney’s Office initiated an investigation to determine if Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer” contains pornographic material. The inquiry was prompted by a complaint received on December 8, asserting that the book was present in an eighth-grade classroom at W.E.B. Du Bois Regional Middle School.

Upon receiving notification of the investigation, Superintendent Peter Dillon was informed by the police. Principal Miles Wheat, accompanied by a plainclothes officer, conducted a search for the book in the classroom after school on December 8. The English teacher, reportedly unaware of the impending search, was present during the search. Despite the use of a body camera by the officer, the book was not found.

District Attorney Timothy Shugrue announced that Great Barrington Police had concluded their investigation, stating that the complaint did not involve criminal activity. Consequently, the matter was closed, and any further action was referred back to the Berkshire Hills Regional School District. The superintendent assured the District Attorney’s Office that the issue would be reviewed according to the school district’s policies, treating it as a school department matter.

Teachers, parents, and students in the community expressed outrage over the incident. More than 100 students at Monument Mountain Regional High School staged a walkout in protest. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey (D) released a statement supporting the walkout, asserting that “book banning has no place” in the state.

In a Facebook post, the teacher whose classroom was searched wrote, “How on earth is a cop more qualified to decide what books are OK to be in an educational setting for teens?”

According to The Berkshire Eagle, the police argued they had a duty to investigate the complaint about Gender Queer. However, the ACLU of Massachusetts expressed deep concern about this notion.

“They say anytime someone could call they have an obligation to go marching into places wearing a body cam, and you know, interrogating people,” Bourquin said, adding that state laws are “pretty clear about police not having roles in this situation.” Obscenity laws, she explained, have been “carefully crafted to ensure not tromping on constitutional free speech rights.”

Bourquin informed the paper that the ACLU has requested the officer’s body camera footage and other records related to the investigation.

Justin Silverman, executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition, explained that obscenity laws test whether a book has value beyond sexual arousal. This “very specific” requirement is not necessarily something the average person or police officer might understand.

Silverman said that he’s concerned about the precedent the Great Barrington Police may have set amid the national rise in book bans primarily targeting books by Black and LGBTQ+ authors. “While it might be rare now, it doesn’t mean that it will be rare in the future,” Silverman said. “I think the school and the police department have to come forth with a policy to make sure that this doesn’t happen again.”

In a statement, the Berkshire Hills Regional School Committee and Superintendent Peter Dillon apologized for the incident.

“The recent incident at the middle school has challenged and impacted our community,” the statement read. “Faced with an unprecedented police investigation of what should be a purely educational issue, we tried our best to serve the interests of students, families, teachers, and staff. In hindsight, we would have approached that moment differently. We are sorry. We can do better to refine and support our existing policies. We are committed to supporting all our students, particularly vulnerable populations.”

Arson at Georgia Clinic for Gender-Affirming Care Investigated as Hate Crime

This blog originally appeared at Advocate.

The recent fire at a clinic providing gender-affirming care is being examined within the context of recently enacted hate crime legislation.


Officials in Georgia are probing a fire from the previous year as an anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime, suspecting arson.

The Decatur Fire Department has officially labeled the fire at a gender clinic in the historic Blair Building on October 30 as a deliberate act of arson and is currently treating it as a possible hate crime.

The Decatur Fire Department efficiently controlled the fire, which, as reported by Atlanta TV station WANF, was confined to a single office and resulted in no injuries. Despite the contained nature of the incident, the investigation has concluded that the fire was deliberately set.

This unsettling incident specifically targeted QMed, a clinic renowned for providing gender-affirming care to transgender and nonbinary individuals. Dr. Izzy Lowell, the proprietor of QMed, informed WANF that the fire resulted in the destruction of their office.

The event is being investigated as first-degree arson, a grave felony. This classification is in accordance with Georgia’s hate crimes law, which was implemented in 2020, extending protections to LGBTQ+ individuals. Convictions under this law carry heightened penalties.

Built in 1939, the Blair Building stands as an impressive specimen of Streamline Moderne architecture and holds a place on the National Register of Historic Places. Serving the Decatur community for over eight decades, it has accommodated a diverse range of businesses and offices.

Following the incident, the city has joined forces with federal and state agencies to probe the crime. Despite the ongoing investigation and no arrests made thus far, the Decatur Fire Department has been circumspect in divulging specific details. The case garnered public attention after an anonymous tip about the incident reached Decaturish.

The arson attack has amplified concerns about the safety of facilities catering to specialized services for marginalized groups. The ongoing investigation aims to determine whether this was a hate-motivated crime.

Seattle cops raided two gay bars, finding an exposed nipple & a jock strap

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

Over the weekend in Seattle, a task force conducted raids on two gay bars, ostensibly in search of “lewd conduct” by both patrons and staff.

“You’re allowed to be who you are in Seattle as long as you don’t go into a gay bar.”

Over the weekend in Seattle, two gay bars were raided by a task force allegedly searching for “lewd conduct” among both patrons and staff.

During the raids in Seattle, investigators reported finding a bartender with an exposed nipple at one venue, and patrons wearing jock straps at another.

The raids in Seattle were carried out by the Joint Enforcement Team (JET), a coalition involving the Police and Fire departments, the state Liquor and Cannabis Board (LCB), and others. Around 12:30 a.m. on Saturday, ten task force members entered The Cuff brandishing flashlights, as reported by owner Joey Burgess. Some patrons left the bar, particularly where the exposed nipple incident occurred, during the raid.

On the following night, two members of the Joint Enforcement Team (JET) entered the Eagle at approximately 11:30 p.m., according to owner Keith Christensen. The inspection at this venue revealed patrons wearing jock straps.

Seattle established the JET task force a few years ago to address nuisance businesses and criminal activity. Neither The Cuff nor The Eagle has a history of alcohol or violence-related offenses.

In Washington, venues where alcohol is served are prohibited from allowing nudity.

The owners, along with a coalition of LGBTQ+ advocates, including writer Dan Savage, released a joint statement condemning the raids.

“The absence of violence or liquor-related issues in the citations indicates a concerning focus on targeting queer individuals in queer spaces,” the statement read.

“The community recalls the generational trauma and the homophobia-driven policies of the not-so-distant past, making the recent actions particularly distressing.”

Cuff owner Burgess mentioned that he has been facing the same issue since Pride celebrations in 2022 when the Liquor and Cannabis Board cited his bar for a customer wearing a jockstrap.

Since then, Cuff staff have been compelled to act as “hall monitors” for patrons’ fashion choices; jock straps are prohibited at the venue, and exposed cracks are not allowed.

Burgess attributes a decline in business to the outdated regulations and points to nearby Cal Anderson Park, where individuals are allowed to play kickball in their jockstraps.

“You’re allowed to be who you are in Seattle as long as you don’t go into a gay bar,” Burgess said. “They’re not going into the other bars the same way as this.”

It’s discrimination, according to Burgess. “There is no other answer.”

Eagle owner Keith Christensen is still awaiting a response from JET regarding a potential citation. He mentioned losing 70% of his business due to citations in February 2008.

“These regulations that are so paternalistic, that control people’s bodies and sexualities, pretty much only affect marginalized communities and non-conforming people,” said Madison Zack-Wu, who directs the worker-led group Strippers Are Workers (SAW).

“I do see the thread here of queer venues being raided and strip clubs being prevented from having a sustainable business model as ultimately authoritarian judgment on how queer people and sex workers are trying to move through the world… Both of our communities should have the right to speak up against this.”

Unhinged dad banned from high school basketball games after accusing player of being trans

This blog originally appeared at LGBTQ Nation.

Following an incident where a Utah dad became belligerent at his high school-aged daughter’s recent junior varsity basketball game, alleging that a player on the opposing team was transgender, he has been banned from attending future games.

“I wasn’t born yesterday, I know that’s a boy!” the dad shouted at the principal.

Jeff Haney, spokesperson for Canyons School District, informed The Salt Lake Tribune that during a game on January 19, the dad in question was actively challenging the eligibility of a player, vocally expressing concerns based on his perception of the student-athlete’s gender.

The man, whose identity remains undisclosed, allegedly confronted the principals of both his daughter’s school and the opposing school after the incident. Both principals reassured him that every player on the court, including the 17-year-old girl in question, had met the eligibility requirements outlined by the Utah High School Athletics Association (UHSAA). UHSAA mandates that student-athletes provide a birth certificate to verify their gender, and for transgender students, proof of undergoing at least one year of hormone therapy is required.

“I wasn’t born yesterday, I know that’s a boy and you better be able to prove yourself because I am going to the top,” the man insisted after the game, according to one principal.

Haney said the man became so belligerent that he was asked to leave, and the principal of his daughter’s school banned him from future games. “We do not tolerate people coming into our community and our schools and harassing our student-athletes,” Haney said.

The incident on January 19 is the most recent case of parents challenging a student athlete’s gender in Utah since the passage of H.B. 11 in 2022. This law prohibits transgender girls in grades K–12 from participating in girls’ sports. However, the law is currently on hold due to a legal challenge initiated by the families of three transgender students. The legal proceedings are ongoing in court.

In 2022, the parents of two girls who secured second and third place in a Utah track event lodged complaints urging the Utah High School Athletics Association (UHSAA) to investigate the gender of the girl who claimed first place. David Spatafore, a spokesperson for UHSAA, disclosed that additional complaints had been received, asserting that the student did not “look feminine enough.” However, Spatafore clarified that upon investigation, it was found that the student had consistently identified as female since kindergarten.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune, there have been additional similar incidents in Utah, but the Utah High School Athletics Association (UHSAA) has not disclosed the frequency or the specific number of such occurrences.

Marina Lowe, policy director at Equality Utah, commented that these incidents offer a glimpse into what might become more common, especially with the enactment of legislation that allows the public to pass judgment on individuals’ physical characteristics, determining whether they are deemed feminine or masculine enough to participate in certain spaces.

Advocates for the LGBTQ+ community have cautioned that transgender sports bans and bathroom bills may lead to policing people’s gender presentation. In some states, such as Idaho, sports bans have included requirements for genital examinations. This stipulation could subject students under investigation to unnecessary and invasive examinations.

“This doesn’t just harm the trans community. It really harms us all,” Lowe said. “Because once we get in the business of policing someone’s appearance… all of us are going to be subject to this sort of inquiry potentially.”

Could Tennessee cease the practice of placing HIV-positive sex workers on the registry for violent sex offenders?


The law, in place for decades, is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Tennessee is contemplating changes to the criminal code that currently discriminates against sex workers who are HIV-positive.

Currently, the law treats prostitution as a misdemeanor unless the sex worker is HIV+. Then the offense becomes “aggravated prostitution,” and if convicted, workers are required to register as a “violent sex offender.”


LGBTQ+ and civil rights organizations are challenging the law in federal court. Following an investigation in December, the Justice Department concluded that the law infringes upon the Americans with Disabilities Act.


However, the law, which disproportionately affects Black and Latino women, is not being completely repealed.


Initially enacted during the peak of AIDS-related concerns in 1991, the law underwent revisions two decades later, incorporating mandatory lifetime registration as a sex offender.

State Senator Page Walley (R) has proposed a bill aiming to eliminate the mandatory registration requirement while retaining the heightened criminal charge.

Despite the repeal of HIV criminalization laws in multiple states in recent years, Tennessee continues to uphold such legislation. Additionally, in states retaining these laws, individuals of color are disproportionately prosecuted. Notably, a significant majority of those prosecuted under Maryland’s HIV criminal law were Black men.

The term “HIV criminal laws” refers to hastily enacted legislation in the late 1980s and ’90s during the widespread panic over the AIDS epidemic. These laws target individuals who intentionally transmit the virus causing AIDS. Currently, nearly two-thirds of U.S. states and territories have laws that criminalize individuals living with HIV.

This statute exclusively singles out individuals based on their HIV status, trapping them in cycles of poverty without providing any tangible benefit to public health and safety,” stated Molly Quinn, Executive Director of OUTMemphis. “As HIV stigma fades away, it’s high time for state law to align with this progress.

The organization is among the plaintiffs involved in the ongoing legal proceedings.

An estimated 83 Tennesseeans are currently on the registry because of the law.

GOP Gov. DeWine announces veto of Ohio bill restricting gender-affirming care

This blog originally appeared at NBC News.

Governor Mike DeWine, during a press conference in Columbus, emphasized that his veto of House Bill 68 was driven by the overarching goal of “protecting human life.” The bill, if enacted, would have imposed restrictions on both transition-related care for minors and the participation of transgender girls on school sports teams.

Click here to see full video: https://www.nbcnews.com/video/gop-gov-dewine-announces-veto-of-ohio-bill-restricting-gender-affirming-care-201111109709

Proposed legislation in West Virginia seeks to classify transgender individuals as “obscene matter” in a concerning move that raises legal and ethical questions about the rights and recognition of the transgender community.

If these two bills are enacted together, they would make it a criminal offense for transgender individuals to be in proximity to a minor or a school, treating it as an act of indecent exposure.

In January, a West Virginia Republican legislator introduced three anti-trans bills, one proposing to label trans individuals as “obscene matter” and another aiming to effectively criminalize the public existence of transgender people, as reported by Jurist.

State Senator Mike Azinger introduced Senate Bills 194, 195, and 197 on January 10, all specifically directed at transgender individuals.

Senate Bill 195 proposes changes to West Virginia’s indecent exposure law, aiming to criminalize involvement in what it terms as “obscene matter.” This includes instances that a “reasonable person” deems lacking in serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. The bill explicitly cites “transgender exposure, performances, or display to any minor” as an example of displays considered “obscene or sexually explicit.” Essentially, if Senate Bill 195 is enacted, a transgender individual could potentially be charged with obscenity simply for existing in public spaces where minors might be present.

Simultaneously, Senate Bill 197 makes it a criminal offense to have “obscene matter” near minors or within 2,500 feet of any public school facility supervised by the state board. The bill specifically highlights “transgender exposure, performances, or display to any minor” as an instance of obscene matter. According to the proposed law, public school staff failing to report a student’s exposure to obscene matter, including the mere existence of transgender individuals, could face prosecution with a potential fine of up to $500 or imprisonment for up to a year.

West Virginia prohibited gender-affirming care for individuals under 18 in the Spring of 2023. However, Senate Bill 194 goes further by extending the ban on gender-affirming care to trans individuals up to the age of 21. Moreover, it forbids treatment for gender dysphoria unless it aligns with a “cure,” indirectly endorsing conversion therapy.

All three bills are presently awaiting consideration in committee.

In a conversation with independent journalist Erin Reed, who focuses on reporting anti-LGBTQ+ legislation for her blog Erin in the Morning, LGBTQ+ organizer Ash Orr characterized the bill as a clear effort to both criminalize and erase the transgender community in West Virginia.

Orr conveyed to Reed, “The reality is that trans individuals, regardless of age, lead fulfilling and joyful lives—challenging the inaccurate narrative fabricated by extremist politicians. [Senate Bill 194] undermines fundamental values of privacy and autonomy over our bodies, relying on deceptive or entirely untrue notions.”

In March of the previous year, West Virginia prohibited gender-affirming care for minors, with an exception allowing doctors to prescribe medical therapy if a teenager is deemed at risk of suicide, as reported by the Associated Press. The Human Rights Campaign notes that 22 states have enacted laws or policies prohibiting gender-affirming care for minors.

In the past year, there were over 500 legislative proposals aimed at limiting LGBTQ+ rights. In 2023, only three states and Washington, DC did not entertain a bill targeting the rights of queer and trans individuals. The Trans Legislation Tracker reports that for 2024, 275 bills are already under consideration, including 176 carried over from the previous year.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑